• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Out of all the rack kits, does anyone make one right?

  • Thread starter Thread starter Flyguyeddy
  • Start date Start date Jun 30, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
F

Flyguyeddy

New Member
Jun 29, 2005
2
0
0
Jun 30, 2005
#1
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #1
More importantly or me, do they all maintain stock turning circles?

if i was to make my own custom fat man style setup, and used the steering arm thats on the spindle instead of the caliper mount, and used an escort or whatever rack, would i be able to maintain the stock turning circle? if so that would be great.

anyone have any ideas?
 

1967stang302

Member
Apr 22, 2005
87
0
6
Orange County, CA
Jun 30, 2005
#2
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #2
check out vikingmustang.com cool swedish dude that if I am correct adapted volvo R&P to work on a '66 and '67 pony. I'm not sure if he is selling them yet, but I do know that he does have plans on how to do it yourself. forgot to mention he swears it has the same turning radius as before.

off topic: he also made a collapsable steering wheel so we don't spear ourselves the first headon collision we are in.



Light a man a fire and he will be warm for a night, light a man on fire and he will be warm the rest of his life.
-Just Fred
 
T

TT670

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2001
360
9
28
Jun 30, 2005
#3
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #3
From what I understand TCP and RRS are as close to "right" as you'll get , but both are pretty expensive too. Go with a randalls rack or a steeroids, and if you get a big enough tire on it you wont have to worry about the rack limiting turning radius..LOL
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Jun 30, 2005
#4
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #4
Well, you asked for ideas. Save your money and get a new steering box and use a roller idler arm. The center link will move so smooth you won't believe it. Add a bump steer kit and your still way under the price of a rack. Rod end strut rods and roller perches will help alot too. Sorry - just my $.02

John
 
S

steel1212

Active Member
Jun 24, 2004
1,180
0
36
47
Frankfort, Ky
Jun 30, 2005
#5
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #5
roller idler arm

roller idler arm? Uh oh John do you want more of my money lol. What is this thing?
 

Håkan

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
168
0
0
68
Enköping, Sweden
www.vikingmustang.com
Jun 30, 2005
#6
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #6
1967stang302 said:
check out vikingmustang.com cool swedish dude that if I am correct adapted volvo R&P to work on a '66 and '67 pony. I'm not sure if he is selling them yet, but I do know that he does have plans on how to do it yourself. forgot to mention he swears it has the same turning radius as before.

off topic: he also made a collapsable steering wheel so we don't spear ourselves the first headon collision we are in.
Click to expand...

It was a modified power r&p from a Mazda 929 that I used on a ´69 Mach1 and a modified manual SAAB r&p that I used on a ´65 convertible. Both were made with a custom centerlink that made it possible to re-use the original tie rods and to minimize bumpsteer. Unfortunately I came to the conclusion that it would be too expensive to mass produce them with this complicated design.

But I have just made a new design using a Opel Vectra (European GM car) center take off rack & pinion and it´s undergoing tests on a ´68 convertible right now. We have sorted out some initial problems that were all related to the hydraulics and it seems to work very good now. The owner of the ´68 says the steering is as good as on his Audi TT.

The Opel r&p have 2,75 turns from lock to lock and more than 6" of rack travel and there´s no increase in turning radius. We kept the inner tie rod ends in the original position, but if/when I decide that this design will go into production I will optimize bumpsteer. I didn´t do any mods to the Opel r&p except for an adapter for the steering U-joint and re-routing the hydraulic lines on it. Later models of this particular Opel r&p have a 3/4" Double-D input shaft and won´t need any adapter.

I´ve also just made a new webpage with some pics and info about this new r&p design: http://www.vikingmustang.com/News_04.asp


steel1212 said:
roller idler arm? Uh oh John do you want more of my money lol. What is this thing?
Click to expand...


This is what I think opentracker means:

 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
57
lubbock, texas
Jun 30, 2005
#7
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #7
Hakan, that new rack looks pretty damn good, i like. it looks a lot like the rack setup that RRS uses and i especially like rack slide you made. looks like RRS' linear travel device. the rack also looks very similar to a GM J-car rack, very possible even a caddy catera rack would work well too since it is based on the opel platform
 

Håkan

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
168
0
0
68
Enköping, Sweden
www.vikingmustang.com
Jun 30, 2005
#8
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #8
bnickel said:
Hakan, that new rack looks pretty damn good, i like. it looks a lot like the rack setup that RRS uses and i especially like rack slide you made. looks like RRS' linear travel device. the rack also looks very similar to a GM J-car rack, very possible even a caddy catera rack would work well too since it is based on the opel platform
Click to expand...

Thanks bnickel!

Yes, it does look a lot like the GM J-car r&p, the one I used was made by ZF, German company that makes a lot of r&ps and other thingies with gears, even transmissions for Formula One. Makes we wanna think it´s high quality.

Another good thing at least for me here in Sweden is that Swedish SAAB was bought by GM back in the nineties and forced to use the Opel Vectra platform for their 9-3 model which means that there´s a lot of these rack & pinions around over here, can even be bought as brand new. If my research tells me right SAAB is still using a the same or at least a very similar rack & pinion.

The power steering pump is also rather straight forward as it´s the GM type II pump available from several vendors and brackets to mount it on a Ford engine can be bought too.
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Jun 30, 2005
#9
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #9
Håkan said:
This is what I think opentracker means:

Click to expand...


That's it. Though the kit on the left is a non-greasable kit from Delta Mustang, and only fits a quick steer idler arm. The one on the right is a greasable kit from Moog that fits regular 6cyl Mustang/Falcon idler arms. Changing the spring perch, strut rod and idler arm to bearings, makes the cars drive much-much better. Cobra Automotive sells a kit that is greasable and works with a stock idler arm or a quick steer kit.

John
 
B

BullittFB

New Member
Nov 23, 2004
89
0
0
Jun 30, 2005
#10
  • Jun 30, 2005
  • #10
According to a thread on Mustang Steve's forum, this company, www.mavalgear.com. is about to come up with a totally bolt on rack and pinion for the mustangs and will be for around $400 bucks, and MS has taked to them about being a distributor.
PS For the benefit of our hobby, hard feelings Stangnet.....right?
 

BobV

20+ Year Stangneter
May 18, 2003
474
0
16
Leavenworth, KS
Jul 1, 2005
#11
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #11
I got mine from www.deltabaymustang.com - used on a standard V8 idler arm, and it is greasable as well.

 
T

tomstir

Founding Member
Jun 28, 2000
342
0
0
San Jose
Jul 1, 2005
#12
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #12
I read somewhere (I think) that the roller bearing idler arm was only to be used for "off road" use...something about not "returning" to center. Hey Opentracker and Bobv and I guess anyone else out there that has one...have you felt this?

tomstir
 
T

TT670

Founding Member
Jul 10, 2001
360
9
28
Jul 1, 2005
#13
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #13
If youve got enough caster the roller idler will be no problem, with stock alignment specs it may not return to center as well.
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Jul 1, 2005
#14
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #14
No problems for us with "return to center". We run a bit more caster than the factory settings. The factory settings are not good for our cars anyway. They were designed for bias ply tires. We run 0 to .5 neg. camber, 1.5 to 2.5 pos. caster and 1/8" toe in.


Delta Bay must be selling a geasable kit along with the kit for the quick steer kit. I learn something new every day on this forum. Thanks, what did it cost? I think the ones from Cobra Automotive are $65.

John
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
www.cardomain.com
Jul 1, 2005
#15
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #15
I keep looking at the GM boxes as an alternative to R&P. Anyone ever seen one on a classic mustang? You can get about any pitman arm for them and get rid of the numb slave power assist.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
57
lubbock, texas
Jul 1, 2005
#16
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #16
problem with the saginaw (GM) power gearboxes is that there isn't enough room for them between the shock tower and firewall.
 

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
www.cardomain.com
Jul 1, 2005
#17
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #17
bnickel said:
problem with the saginaw (GM) power gearboxes is that there isn't enough room for them between the shock tower and firewall.
Click to expand...
I was actually looking at the tri-5 box. It looks like the same bolt pattern in a borgeson ad in street rodder magazine. I'm sure someone has tried it and if it worked it would be a popular swap. Bnickel, I saw in a post elsewhere that you are sticking with 15's on your car. What brand, size tire are you using? I want 15's too, but tire size seems limited. M/T is coming out with some good looking radials in 15", http://mickeythompsontires.com/street.html , but not 'til sept.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
57
lubbock, texas
Jul 1, 2005
#18
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #18
well it will eventually have 15x8's all around with 295/50-15's out back and i'm hoping i can squeeze a 275/50-15 up front but i'll have to wait and see on that one. right now it has 15x8 275/50-15 out back and 15x7 235/60-15 up front, the front tires are a little taller than the rear because of the inch of rim width. i like to have some sidewall so it has a bit better ride. i know a 275/40-17 will fit up front but to fit a 275/50-15 up front i'll have do some playing around with rim width and backspace first. if i can't fit those up front i'll stay with the 235/60-15 front and 295/50-15 rear. i may also have to go wider on the rear for the 295/50 like maybe to a 9 or 9.5" wheel
 

70vert

New Member
Dec 31, 2004
722
0
0
Bay Area, CA
Jul 1, 2005
#19
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #19
A fixed Steeroids??

Håkan,

Is this basically a Steeroids-like design with a few things to minimize flex? It looks like you have a more solid connection to the frame and that slider bar is there to add stiffness, I imagine? It also seems like there's no compromise to the steering travel. Here are photos of the Steeroids. They mount in the same place. Would you care to comment on what is similar and different to their design? (I have Steeroids installed)



and here's a link to a few final install photos on my ride:

http://homepage.mac.com/jbauder/steeroidsuniqueweb/steeroidsuniqueweb.html


Thanks,
Joe



Håkan said:
It was a modified power r&p from a Mazda 929 that I used on a ´69 Mach1 and a modified manual SAAB r&p that I used on a ´65 convertible. Both were made with a custom centerlink that made it possible to re-use the original tie rods and to minimize bumpsteer. Unfortunately I came to the conclusion that it would be too expensive to mass produce them with this complicated design.

But I have just made a new design using a Opel Vectra (European GM car) center take off rack & pinion and it´s undergoing tests on a ´68 convertible right now. We have sorted out some initial problems that were all related to the hydraulics and it seems to work very good now. The owner of the ´68 says the steering is as good as on his Audi TT.

The Opel r&p have 2,75 turns from lock to lock and more than 6" of rack travel and there´s no increase in turning radius. We kept the inner tie rod ends in the original position, but if/when I decide that this design will go into production I will optimize bumpsteer. I didn´t do any mods to the Opel r&p except for an adapter for the steering U-joint and re-routing the hydraulic lines on it. Later models of this particular Opel r&p have a 3/4" Double-D input shaft and won´t need any adapter.
Click to expand...
 

Håkan

Founding Member
Apr 1, 2002
168
0
0
68
Enköping, Sweden
www.vikingmustang.com
Jul 1, 2005
#20
  • Jul 1, 2005
  • #20
70vert said:
Håkan,

Is this basically a Steeroids-like design with a few things to minimize flex? It looks like you have a more solid connection to the frame and that slider bar is there to add stiffness, I imagine? It also seems like there's no compromise to the steering travel. Here are photos of the Steeroids. They mount in the same place. Would you care to comment on what is similar and different to their design? (I have Steeroids installed)



and here's a link to a few final install photos on my ride:

http://homepage.mac.com/jbauder/steeroidsuniqueweb/steeroidsuniqueweb.html


Thanks,
Joe
Click to expand...

Hard to say as I´ve never seen any of the American kits IRL. I have seen a GM J-car r&p though in MustangSteve´s garage in Carrollton, Texas when I was there last summer, but that´s about it.

Here´s some additional info about my prototype design that might make it different:

The brackets I´ve made to attach the Opel r&p to the framerails uses 6 bolts on the driver´s side and 3 bolts on the passenger side. The material I used in the brackets is 4 mm (3/16") steel. We tested a more simple bracket on the driver´s side to begin with, but it was flexing and I added some gussets and 2 more bolts to make it solid.

I used the same 4 mm (3/16") steel material to make the new centerlink or the piece that connects the tie rods to the r&p. In all holes there´s turned inserts welded making it possible to re-use the original inner tie rod ends and the 2 original M12 (~1/2") fine threaded bolts on the Opel r&p. There´s also reinforcements welded to the backside of the piece connecting the inner tie rod ends to the r&p.

I re-used the original tie rods with inner and outer tie rod ends.

When I started to make this new prototype I didn´t know who was going to test it, so I made it possible to use it on either a ´65/´66 or a ´67 - ´70 Mustang and when I saw how far it was between the 2 bolts in the center of the r&p and the inner tie rod end hole on the passenger side if used on a ´65/´66 Mustang I made that slide bar to support that end of the piece connecting the the inner tie rod ends to the r&p.

I´ve also found that there´s poly bushings available instead of the original rubber bushing that I took from the Opel to attach the r&p to my brackets and we might try them out to make the whole thing even more solid.

Maybe I also should mention that the ´68 Mustang we are testing this prototype on have a front and rear suspension that is as good as you make it using the original but reinforced A-arms, poly bushings, Koni shocks, HD springs, fine tuned alignment, swaybars, Baer front brakes, 17" wheels etc. It´s powered by a Paxton supercharged 347 and also has a Cobra T5 transmission, Recaro seats and so on.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
67
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
919
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
204
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
For Sale 2000 GT Conv 4.6 block, heads lots of misc engine parts all removed,degreased, cleaned and inspected.
  • Tods Hot Rods
  • Sep 17, 2024
  • Engine and Power Adder Parts
Replies
3
Views
706
Engine and Power Adder Parts Sep 19, 2024
Tods Hot Rods
0
V6 to V8 Swap info
  • 02_2v_Curtis
  • Jan 11, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
748
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jan 11, 2026
02_2v_Curtis
0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?