Pedal geometry on a Fox

HotFox

15 Year Member
Jan 5, 2009
1,008
607
164
SE Michigan
Looking for someone to measure pedal length from pivot point to center of pad. Then pivot to booster linkage. Can someone measure it?
I'm at 9.25/2.25=4.11 with the cobra

I am upgrading brakes on dads cobra and I am using the caliper bore area/ms area ratio of 14-17:1. I am currently at 15.8:1 with a 1998 1.062" Mustang MC.

@Mustang5L5
Suggested check the geometry between the Fox and this Cobra pedals if all else is equal I should be good.
Thank you,
Scott
20200516_105538.jpg
20200511_181109.jpg
 
  • Happy
Reactions: 1 user
  • Sponsors (?)


Looking for someone to measure pedal length from pivot point to center of pad. Then pivot to booster linkage. Can someone measure it?
I'm at 9.25/2.25=4.11 with the cobra

I am upgrading brakes on dads cobra and I am using the caliper bore area/ms area ratio of 14-17:1. I am currently at 15.8:1 with a 1998 1.062" Mustang MC.

@Mustang5L5
Suggested check the geometry between the Fox and this Cobra pedals if all else is equal I should be good.
Thank you,
Scott
20200516_105538.jpg
20200511_181109.jpg


I believe the 87-93 pedal is 13” with the rod attachment down 3.5”. Still looking to confirm this.

13/3.5= 3.7 pedal ratio.

That’s pretty close, with the cobra pedal having a bit more leverage than the mustang pedal. Manual brake setups usually have a ratio of 5 to 6 and run a 7/8” bore MC typically

Your prob be ok with the 1 1/16” MC as well. This is prob one of those situations where it comes down to owner preference. Fortunately both the 1” 93 cobra and 1 1/16” MC use the same brake fitting sizes so it’s an easy interchange of the GT Mc proves to be too soft or the stroke too long
 
Last edited:
  • Hell Yeah!
Reactions: 1 user