• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

port size, what rpm range?

  • Thread starter Thread starter muh'stang
  • Start date Start date Dec 16, 2003

muh'stang

If I were rich, I'd make sure all the scoops on my
Sep 26, 2003
277
0
0
Quesnel, B.C., Canada
Dec 16, 2003
#1
  • Dec 16, 2003
  • #1
I have an '85 302. Im undersizing & offset grinding the crank to accept 5.2" rods, leaving me with about 317cid. The heads I want to use are from a 351w, car. They have 1.94"X1.76" intake ports, and 1.24"x1.04" exhuast ports. The 302 heads have a 1.94"x1.04" intake port, and identical exhuast port. What rpm should I try to make my power at? ill hope to run a slightly overstock cam, but things change.
 

muh'stang

If I were rich, I'd make sure all the scoops on my
Sep 26, 2003
277
0
0
Quesnel, B.C., Canada
Dec 17, 2003
#2
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #2
blkfrd said:
Ported, they'll support your 317 to 7000 with the right cam.
Click to expand...
Thanks for all of the other info. So how do I figure out what the right cam is?
 

muh'stang

If I were rich, I'd make sure all the scoops on my
Sep 26, 2003
277
0
0
Quesnel, B.C., Canada
Dec 17, 2003
#3
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #3
also, I was thinking about it at work today. All this port size and head flow makes my brain hurt. Will these heads support my goal for about 300-325 flywheel hp with the right cam?
 

muh'stang

If I were rich, I'd make sure all the scoops on my
Sep 26, 2003
277
0
0
Quesnel, B.C., Canada
Dec 17, 2003
#4
  • Dec 17, 2003
  • #4
I live in BC Canada.
Thanks for all the input, Im actually going EFI with Speed Density. Now I know the stock stuff pretty much cuts out around 275 horse. That part is easy to upgrade, however I would like to have a long block ready to achieve 350~ rwhp so I do not have to take it all apart again. I am going to use an 80s model SROD 4 speed manual transmission. My car is a 1987, I posted in here because you guys know how to make an engine run without thousands of dollars in bolt-ons that barely do any good.
I dont know what size valves yet, but for kicks lets say I use the stock ones....are you still reccommending the comp cams 282s? (that was a Comp. Cams product right?)
I used to think that the bigger the ports the more power you have all around. Then I learned that well in alot of cases some heads will hurt your "street" performance, as well as some cams. So Im in left field wandering around lost, thanks for the help.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

SN95 Desktop 363 Engine Combination - Looking for input
  • WhiteCobra95
  • Sep 8, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 6, 2025
Habu135
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
870
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Which one of these 3 intakes make the most sense for my 331 combo
  • from6to8
  • Jul 25, 2024
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
7
Views
2K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jul 26, 2024
AeroCoupe
Progress Thread H/C Swap Problems/Ideas
  • sav22rem22
  • Mar 31, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 10, 2024
AeroCoupe
C
experienced engine builders chime in
  • Cclaro
  • Oct 4, 2021
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
55
Views
6K
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Oct 16, 2021
Shawn_Mc
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?