• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Possible Valve Clearance Issue?

  • Thread starter Thread starter ShiftTheDrift
  • Start date Start date May 12, 2005

ShiftTheDrift

New Member
Dec 16, 2002
365
0
0
Bakersfield, CA
May 12, 2005
#1
  • May 12, 2005
  • #1
Do you guys think I'll have valve clearance issues with an E303 cam and 1.7 rockers? I'm thinking that would put me right at .540 lift?

I really don't want to retard the cam if I can get away with it. Thanks!
 

95CobraMike

Active Member
Apr 12, 2004
1,046
0
36
Lima OH
May 12, 2005
#2
  • May 12, 2005
  • #2
have your heads ever been milled down?
actually what heads are you running??that should be the first question
 

ShiftTheDrift

New Member
Dec 16, 2002
365
0
0
Bakersfield, CA
May 12, 2005
#3
  • May 12, 2005
  • #3
Trick Flow's Twisted Wedge (non o-ringed) as they come from the factory.
 

ShiftTheDrift

New Member
Dec 16, 2002
365
0
0
Bakersfield, CA
May 12, 2005
#4
  • May 12, 2005
  • #4
Correction, it's actually lower than .540. Check it out:

.498 (e303 advertised lift) / 1.6 (old rockers) = .31125 * 1.7 (new rockers) = .529 lift

Look right?
 

ShiftTheDrift

New Member
Dec 16, 2002
365
0
0
Bakersfield, CA
May 12, 2005
#5
  • May 12, 2005
  • #5
This is taken verbatim from Trick Flow's web site..

"Maximum cam specifications with factory flat top pistons: 224° duration at .050" lift, 112° lobe separation with .540" lift"

FMS E-303 Camshaft Specs
---------------------------------------------------------
Advertised duration: 282 intake/282 exhaust
Duration at .050 in. cam lift: 220 intake/220 exhaust
Gross valve lift: .498 in. intake/.498 exhaust
Lobe separation: 110 degrees
---------------------------------------------------------

My calculated max lift is .529 with 1.7 rockers. (see above) Please correct me if I'm wrong. Thanks!
 

ShiftTheDrift

New Member
Dec 16, 2002
365
0
0
Bakersfield, CA
May 13, 2005
#6
  • May 13, 2005
  • #6
I've got to start work on this tomorrow. Does anybody have an idea?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Does anyone else have a combo close to this
  • 90Stanger302
  • Dec 10, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
233
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 25, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
A
Discussion on mild budget build/ top end
  • Acesario
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
20
Views
649
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 23, 2026
General karthief
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
689
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Engine (EGR Deleted) Solution the hotter combustion chambers?
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jan 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 3 4 5
Replies
97
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 2, 2026
PonyGTrider
Tunerstudio help / services
  • Kabuki_notch
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
Replies
2
Views
233
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 2, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?