• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Engine Power gains from this....

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jhussey1280
  • Start date Start date Jan 30, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Jhussey1280

Member
Jan 31, 2012
185
4
19
New Pal, Indiana
Jan 30, 2013
#1
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #1
Hey guys, just pulled the A/C system off of my car and I'm wondering if anyone knows a rough guestimate on how much power may be gained and how much weight is saved over all. The only thing I left on was the core in the dash.

Thanks.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 30, 2013
#2
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #2
20 lbs and maybe 5 hp
 

jcgafford

10 Year Member
Jan 7, 2012
1,114
95
104
Adrian, MI
Jan 30, 2013
#3
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #3
madspeed said:
20 lbs and maybe 5 hp
Click to expand...
which amounts to a hot summer and no noticeable power gain. at roughly 6 pounds a gallon you would have been better off keeping the a/c and keeping the tank half full.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 30, 2013
#4
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #4
correct!
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 30, 2013
#5
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #5
considering the a/c compressor disengages at wot, no real performance gains are made
 

jcgafford

10 Year Member
Jan 7, 2012
1,114
95
104
Adrian, MI
Jan 30, 2013
#6
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #6
madspeed said:
considering the a/c compressor disengages at wot, no real performance gains are made
Click to expand...
there is always that hesitation with wot with the a/c on. BUT you can just turn it off to avoid that. and on the way home from the track or after you passed the moron in the left lane doing 60mph you can switch it back on for a comfortable ride.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 30, 2013
#7
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #7
Youre not gonna even have it turned on if youre at the track. The slight hesitation during a streetrace on a closed course or whatever isnt gonna make much dif....Leave it on if you can!
 

jcgafford

10 Year Member
Jan 7, 2012
1,114
95
104
Adrian, MI
Jan 30, 2013
#8
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #8
madspeed said:
Youre not gonna even have it turned on if youre at the track. The slight hesitation during a streetrace or whatever isnt gonna make much dif....Leave it on if you can!
Click to expand...
street races are naughty
 
Reactions: madspeed

Jhussey1280

Member
Jan 31, 2012
185
4
19
New Pal, Indiana
Jan 30, 2013
#9
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #9
Haha well thanks for the answer. I'm not worried about having the A/C but thank you all for the concerns.....
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Jan 30, 2013
#10
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #10
jcgafford said:
street races are naughty
Click to expand...


edited LOL
 
D

Deleted member 38176

Jan 30, 2013
#11
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #11
0 hp
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 30, 2013
#12
  • Jan 30, 2013
  • #12
Agree with the above.

When the compressor is "off" it acts as an idler and consumes virtually no measureable power.

In removing it you've removed, say, 20lbs (madspeed's #) from the car. A Mustang weighs roughly 3400 pounds with the driver so by removing the A/C components now you're at 3380. If you are still stock and making 215HP, your weight to power ratio went from 15.81 to 15.72; pretty much a rounding error. Don't expect to feel anything in terms of acceleration.

You've removed 20 pounds, all of it from the nose of the car. This means that the weight distribution has moved marginally backwards. At the curb the car weighs ~3250 lbs and had a distribution of approximately 57/43. This means that 1852 pounds are on the front wheels. With the A/C removed this drops to 1832 pounds. With the total vehicle weight dropping to 3230 this means the weight dist is now 56.7/43.3%. I doubt you'll feel this in daily handling and braking.

This kind of delete might make sense on a 9- or 10/10ths race car but seems without benefit on a daily.
 

Jhussey1280

Member
Jan 31, 2012
185
4
19
New Pal, Indiana
Jan 31, 2013
#13
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #13
Never said my car was a daily driver. I was just asking because I needed the info for something, but thank you.
 

trinity_gt

10 Year Member
Jan 31, 2003
3,125
81
99
Canada
Jan 31, 2013
#14
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #14
Jhussey1280 said:
Never said my car was a daily driver. I was just asking because I needed the info for something, but thank you.
Click to expand...

The car in your avatar looks like a daily and you didn't say the car wasn't a daily...
 

Jhussey1280

Member
Jan 31, 2012
185
4
19
New Pal, Indiana
Jan 31, 2013
#15
  • Jan 31, 2013
  • #15
I also didn't say it was the car in my avatar, but again thank you.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Feb 2, 2013
#16
  • Feb 2, 2013
  • #16
Put the ac back on.... You gained zero hp, lost 8lbs of weight and de-valued the car!
 
0

007

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2002
3,287
24
69
Broke
Feb 2, 2013
#17
  • Feb 2, 2013
  • #17
Its a convertible people. Give the guy a break! I have literally NEVER used my AC.
 

Jhussey1280

Member
Jan 31, 2012
185
4
19
New Pal, Indiana
Feb 2, 2013
#18
  • Feb 2, 2013
  • #18
All I did was ask for some simple numbers. I didn't ask for anyones opinions on the removal of an A/C system. Thank you 007.
 

Modular2v

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
3,222
23
99
oklahoma
Feb 2, 2013
#19
  • Feb 2, 2013
  • #19
I didnt mean anything demeaning by what i said. Its just literally a waste of time and effort to remove the ac on a street car if it works! Even on my car which is setup for 600hp, i would NEVER remove the ac. It simply just doesnt make sense. Why remove it? To pick up hp gain? Well there is none to be gained. The only thing he gained was the loss of cold air when its 100* out! Now, if the car was running 9s and he was trying to shave every ounce of weight off to pick up ET and mph at the track then sure but there are even 9 second cars with ac..... He litrally would have noticed more a difference by removing his spare from the trunk.
 

bhuff30

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
6,037
35
129
Olathe KS
Feb 3, 2013
#20
  • Feb 3, 2013
  • #20
Said well by someone who has obviously never raced seriously. I yanked the AC on my 88 mustang, and later on the entire heater box.

A drag car will be taken apart frequently for modifications, repairs, ect. The simpler it is to work on, the better. If you are at the track and break something, time is CRITICAL. Anything that un-necessarily slows you down could cost you the race. Even if you have plenty of time, the AC is just another thing that's in the way anytime you need to pull the engine.

As for performance, the only benefit as others said is the 20lb weight loss. No measurable hp gain as the compressor switches off near WOT. But what if you pull the AC system, heater, HVAC box, misc. insulation, sway bar, cruise control, washer fluid tank, ECT, you can easily add up to 100lbs or more. Some skinnys, tubular front suspension and you are talking some serious weight loss. And this is weight loss from the FRONT. Ever drag raced? Weight you pull out of the rear of a mustang tends to have no effect on ET because you loose traction more easily. I ran my first 12s pass just before leaving the track once... loaded my tools, spare parts, and other junk in the trunk and made the 12s pass at a lower mph after making about 10 low 13s passes for the night.

What the OP is doing? I dunno, but it's his car. Maybe he has a master plan. Gotta take one step at a time.

Modular2v said:
I didnt mean anything demeaning by what i said. Its just literally a waste of time and effort to remove the ac on a street car if it works! Even on my car which is setup for 600hp, i would NEVER remove the ac. It simply just doesnt make sense. Why remove it? To pick up hp gain? Well there is none to be gained. The only thing he gained was the loss of cold air when its 100* out! Now, if the car was running 9s and he was trying to shave every ounce of weight off to pick up ET and mph at the track then sure but there are even 9 second cars with ac..... He litrally would have noticed more a difference by removing his spare from the trunk.
Click to expand...
 
Reactions: Jhussey1280
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Good shop in Washington state or Oregon
  • keel
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
97
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2026
keel
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
263
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
S
01 GT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK CYLINDER LINKAGE
  • Scwhitten
  • May 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
117
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2026
melo.timo
M
H
Strange steering/brake issue
  • Haxmaster
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
57
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 3, 2026
squeak93
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
305
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?