• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Powerstroke Fox-body

  • Thread starter Thread starter 87orangecoupe
  • Start date Start date Oct 26, 2007
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
8

87orangecoupe

New Member
Jul 25, 2007
2
0
0
Oct 26, 2007
#1
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #1
I have an '87 coupe currently powered by a 351w. I was wondering if anyone knew if it is possible to install a newer powerstroke into my coupe with the least amount of chopping it up. I have been really looking into diesel power and it is phenominal.
 

85ragtop

BTW, I like dudes.
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
823
475
123
NC
Oct 26, 2007
#2
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #2
I have never seen it done, but it would be cool.
 

Matt's 03 GT

Member
Aug 28, 2006
0
0
17
Orange County
Oct 26, 2007
#3
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #3


They can go very fast. I believe this truck hit 200 mph on the salt flats and 10's in the 1/4 mile...

I would think weight would be the biggest problem. I would plan on a lot of fabricating and a lot of hacking... most of these diesel's are big!!!
 

MrXCESSIVESPEED

Member
Mar 10, 2002
0
1
6
Maryland
Oct 26, 2007
#4
  • Oct 26, 2007
  • #4
I agree..it would be neat but the weight would be killer and there would definitely need to be some fabbing and cutting.
 
R

RedFox5.0

New Member
Apr 3, 2007
16
0
0
PA
Oct 27, 2007
#5
  • Oct 27, 2007
  • #5
If you do it I will, uhh, do some crazy ****.

Anyway, this idea has been floating around in my head since forever but I do not have the funds or tools and skills to do it.
 

PUNISHER RACING

Active Member
Aug 27, 2007
1,124
0
36
FORD CITY, PA.
Oct 27, 2007
#6
  • Oct 27, 2007
  • #6
The weight alone would negate any positive effects it would have on streetable performance unless burnouts are your game then in that case party on
 
R

roan65

Member
May 17, 2003
103
0
16
Wasilla Alaska
Oct 28, 2007
#7
  • Oct 28, 2007
  • #7
a fully dressed powerstroke is probably around the 1200lb range, pretty heavy for a such a light car. Your best bet would be a VW TDI. They are not huge on power, but with injectors and computer mods, you might be around the 250hp range. The only other option would be a 4bt Cummins. Once again not real big on power. They are mostly bread trucks and small industrial equipment that use these. The is very little performance upgrades for them. Navistar/ford have been discussing, a 4 cyl PSD to put in rangers, and a 6 cyl PSD to put in 1/2 tons. The way the diesel craze is going I would bet you might see them in the next few years.
 
B

Blue87SrangGT

New Member
Sep 4, 2007
2
0
0
Ohio
Oct 31, 2007
#8
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #8
I thought that a 7.3 liter powerstroke was about the same size of a 460, considering a 7.3 is only a 445 cubic inch motor i believe. I could be wrong though.
 

87foxstang

Member
May 10, 2007
0
0
16
Cromwell, CT
Oct 31, 2007
#9
  • Oct 31, 2007
  • #9
yea the weight would definitely be an issue...but with the torque you can make with a diesel it could be worth it
 
N

Nosfurato

Founding Member
Apr 8, 2002
296
0
17
Indiana
Nov 1, 2007
#10
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #10
87foxstang said:
yea the weight would definitely be an issue...but with the torque you can make with a diesel it could be worth it
Click to expand...

There is a local guy, that put a 5.4 lightning motor in an SN95, I dont know all the logistics of it, (never got a chance to talk to him) that damn thing hauled ass!! lol Smooth idle, massive torque. He had the stock hood on it at the time, yeah.. it had a hole cut in it, which is what first made me go.. "WTF??" then I looked at it closer, then got a chance to see it run!

The powerstroke thing, that would be cool as hell, but the packaging to get it done?.. ehh I dunno. But, hey.. it would be REALLY different,

Some of the best things in life, have come because someone said "It cant be done!"

If its something you really want to do, Im sure it CAN be done. And, personally, I would actually like to see it!! that'd be sweet!


goto it man!!


Will.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Nov 1, 2007
#11
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #11
Another challenge would be exhaust and the turbo. I have a 6.0L sitting in my back room right now and it is huge. I couldn't imagine a 7.3L under the hood of a fox body.
 

nvr2low

Member
Apr 17, 2007
1
0
16
syracuse ny
Nov 1, 2007
#12
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #12
roan65 said:
Navistar/ford have been discussing, a 4 cyl PSD to put in rangers The way the diesel craze is going I would bet you might see them in the next few years.
Click to expand...


the ranger does have a diesel model from the 80's. its hard to find though. they do have new diesel rangers but you cant get them in north amarica, you have to go south. they may be floating around mexico also, but im not sure.
 

jake2582

New Member
Jan 8, 2007
107
0
0
tallapoosa
Nov 1, 2007
#13
  • Nov 1, 2007
  • #13
it would be i pita! powerstrokes are electronic (smart) engines.
plus the turbo is on top*

a cummins 12 valve would be easier. they are dumb. (they will run in the floor with fuel) NO WIRES AT ALL!!!
the turbo is on the side, not against the fire wall*
 

h8my408

Member
Aug 27, 2007
93
0
7
Houston, Tx
Nov 6, 2007
#14
  • Nov 6, 2007
  • #14
lol. omg. my dad has a 7.3 powerstroke f250. that thing has 205hp and 425lbtq...
with.. 25:1 compression. HOLY CRAP!!!!!!!

anyway, i used a pilot bearing from an 85 turbodiesel ranger. it's a 4cyl but its still, a, turbodiesel.....
 
J

JAA55

New Member
Mar 14, 2007
5
0
0
Jan 8, 2008
#15
  • Jan 8, 2008
  • #15
i'll tell you a good motor for this swap our new ford LCF has a TT V6 powerstroke in it and its a good running truck.
 

vikingpower

New Member
Dec 6, 2004
656
0
0
CWU Ellensburg, WA
Jan 27, 2008
#16
  • Jan 27, 2008
  • #16
I dont think a 90/10 weight distribution with 600 ftlb torque would be any fun to drive. The rattling and stinking sooty exhaust would be awesome though.
 
J

JDelaney

New Member
Aug 26, 2008
6
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Sep 22, 2008
#17
  • Sep 22, 2008
  • #17
The 4BT Cummins uses quite a few of the same components as the 6BT. Some tricked out 5.9L injectors, injector pump mods, and a couple of turbos would make some good power. Not to mention nitrous. Diesels love nitrous.
 
S

slow84lx

clean it good before insertion
Jul 3, 2005
372
180
63
Dallas, TX
Sep 27, 2008
#18
  • Sep 27, 2008
  • #18
If you intend to do this swap be prepared for plenty of fabrication......and what transmission do you plan to use behind your diesel? That may be a bigger problem than the engine.
 
J

JDelaney

New Member
Aug 26, 2008
6
0
0
Vancouver, WA
Sep 28, 2008
#19
  • Sep 28, 2008
  • #19
IF you go the 4BT Cummins rout, there are parts available to bolt up just about what ever transmission you want to use. Check these guys out:

DESTROKED: Cummins Conversions
 
D

Duece Bigalow

New Member
Nov 21, 2002
5
0
0
Colo.Spgs,Co
Oct 14, 2008
#20
  • Oct 14, 2008
  • #20
87foxstang said:
yea the weight would definitely be an issue...but with the torque you can make with a diesel it could be worth it
Click to expand...

Not only the weight, but the size, physically, is just too much for a fox body. I work around and on Powerstrokes all day long, 7.3's, 6.0's and 6.4's. It is just not feasible. Turbo that 351 and you'll be very happy.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
New here , too many cars and too many problems
  • spencergt66
  • Mar 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
174
The Welcome Wagon Mar 21, 2026
spencergt66
S
N
2nd Fox Body
  • N8827N
  • Jul 17, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
4
Views
108
The Welcome Wagon Jul 18, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
Ford truck engine swap issues
  • keel
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
17
Views
385
Other Auto Tech Jul 13, 2026
General karthief
T
Electrical Brown Connector #31
  • ta66
  • Jul 26, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
105
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 30, 2026
ta66
T
9
Engine Donor '00 Mountaineer meet '91 Fox
  • 91firecracker
  • May 11, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
41
Views
979
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 28, 2026
91firecracker
9
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?