• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Exhaust Primary Tube Header Length...

  • Thread starter Thread starter geoklass
  • Start date Start date Dec 11, 2019

geoklass

Active Member
Sep 3, 2018
108
34
38
Monrovia, California
Dec 11, 2019
#1
  • Dec 11, 2019
  • #1
How long should the primaries be on Long Tube Headers? Well, the simple answer is not too short and not too long. Somewhere between 30-inches and maybe 33-inches seems to kind of be the standard. The funny thing is that if they are shorter than that it really doesn't seem to hurt power at all. The only thing about making the primaries shorter than that is that you can no longer call them Long Tube Headers. And so what? When we started building headers, there was no such thing as Long Tube Headers, they just called them "tubular headers". I can't actually remember when the name "Long Tube Headers" first started. Probably when the original Mustang 5.0 headers were introduced, and people started referring to them as "shorty headers". At any rate, Long Tube Headers is what people ask for and that's what we offer for the early Mustangs (1965-1971) as well as the later Mustangs (1979-1995). On the early Mustangs, depending on the year of the car and the deck height of the engine (8.2-inch or 9.5-inch), we offer Long Tube Headers with 1 5/8-inch up to 2-inch primaries, for pretty much any cylinder head you can think of. Are they equal length primaries? Nope. They are as close as we can get to being equal length considering the tight engine compartments, but they are not equal. Nobody can build equal length header to fit into stock chassis. The good news is that it really is not very critical if the primaries are equal length. It's a myth.

This is about as close aw we can get.


If we had all the room in the world under the hood of a Mustang to build headers like this, we could do it, but that is just not the case. Actually, these headers are probably not perfectly equal either. But again, so what? It really is just not that critical. And even if they were equal length, the length is only "perfect" for what RPM? 6000 RPM? 6800 RPM? 7500 RPM? 5000 RPM? Pick one because the "perfect" length is only "perfect for one specific RPM, and is either too short or two long for any other RPM. But, and this is a BIG but, we do not run our engine at only one RPM. We want good performance maybe starting at 3000 RPM all the way up to maybe 6500 RPM, and there is NO "perfect" length for an RPM spread like that. And so, we compromise. By the way, the same holds true for intake manifold runner length. It's not always easy to have equal runner length on intake manifolds, either, and even if we could, what is the "perfect" runner length? Same issue as with headers, there is no "perfect runner length" for all RPM's, only one specific RPM. In the 1970's, when the Can Am sports cars were a big deal, the McLaren's were the hot set up.

They were powered by fuel injected Big Block Chevy engines.

The runners are NOT equal length, on purpose. Sports Car racing engines are constantly going up and down on RPM, going into turns, coming out of turns, straight aways, etc., with the driver shifting up and down dozens of times every lap. The McLaren engineers figured out that the only way they could get the "perfect" runner length, was to compromise and make four runners too long and four runners too short, and somewhere in the middle was the "perfect" length.

Anyway, if you are looking for good fitting high performance headers at a fair price, give us a call at (909) 552-3690. Every header is built one at a time specifically for the customer's car / engine / transmission combination.

George Klass - RCI Custom Headers
 
Reactions: Hoytster

Hoytster

I don't dare do that to my Knob
20+ Year Stangneter
Dec 30, 2002
1,069
700
164
Cornwall, PA
Dec 11, 2019
#2
  • Dec 11, 2019
  • #2
I'll be looking you guys up in the next couple months for a set of headers for my 363 / C4 combo. Really like the look of your mid-length headers as I'm trying to get away from long tubes.
 
D

Darkman270

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
7
0
1
Pensacola Florida
Dec 12, 2019
#3
  • Dec 12, 2019
  • #3
I will be needing a set for a 69 Mustang with MR heads same as CJ heads. Large displacement ~511 so probably want 2/2 1/8" primaries. Is it possible to place all four tubes behind the shock tower or do the forward tubes have to go under the lower A arm?
 

geoklass

Active Member
Sep 3, 2018
108
34
38
Monrovia, California
Dec 13, 2019
#4
  • Dec 13, 2019
  • #4
MR heads? What are they? Are these Cleveland 4V style heads? Are using a Cleveland/Windsor style block or an FE block?
 
D

Darkman270

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
7
0
1
Pensacola Florida
Dec 13, 2019
#5
  • Dec 13, 2019
  • #5
MR is Medium Riser. This is an FE. They are not Cleveland.
 

geoklass

Active Member
Sep 3, 2018
108
34
38
Monrovia, California
Dec 13, 2019
#6
  • Dec 13, 2019
  • #6
I wondered about that. The answer is yes, we can do that header on that year Mustang, and that combination. And yes, the front primaries do need to go under the front suspension...
 
D

Darkman270

New Member
Oct 2, 2003
7
0
1
Pensacola Florida
Dec 14, 2019
#7
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • #7
What is the flange thickness and tube wall? The tubes would be 2 1/8" and collector 3 1/2 or 4"? Do you have a price? Have you built these before? Do you have any pictures of them?
 

geoklass

Active Member
Sep 3, 2018
108
34
38
Monrovia, California
Dec 14, 2019
#8
  • Dec 14, 2019
  • #8
Let's discuss this on Monday. Give me a call at (909) 552-3690. Have you checked out our website? www.rciheaders.com

The 2 1/8" FE Long Tube Headers require a Slip-On Collector. The standard header with the 3 1/2" Collector is $1,049. If you would rather have a 4" collector, the price is $1,089. Our flanges are 5/16" thick. On this particular header, we use a "step header" design, in which the first few inches of the primary are 2" diameter, stepped to 2 1/8" for the rest of the primaries. We have found in testing that this ads additional mid-range torque without hurting top end power...

George Klass
 
Last edited: Dec 14, 2019
Reactions: Darkman270
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

4
1965 mustang 351 850 hp+ primary tubes 1 7/8 or larger and a 3 inch or larger collectors?
  • 427nostang
  • Jun 4, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
49
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Saturday at 6:21 PM
General karthief
S
Fox '87 GT can't get to stay running
  • spilly
  • Mar 29, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
574
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
Exhaust 1 3/4” Long Tubes on a Fox Body AOD – Easiest route?
  • 5.0 Mike
  • Mar 19, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 21, 2025
5.0 Mike
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
691
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
0
Engine Multiple o2 sensor codes, car runs terrible
  • 02newedge
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
5
Views
476
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 19, 2025
squeak93
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?