• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Proper Caster & Camber

  • Thread starter Thread starter Dr Jay
  • Start date Start date May 28, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last

Dr Jay

Member
Jan 1, 2004
134
0
16
Canada
May 28, 2008
#1
  • May 28, 2008
  • #1
My Ford dealer is having a little trouble getting my car lined up properly. I installed MM CC plates with the Bilstein's so there is plenty of room to make adjustments but the guy doing the line up says his computer is set up with stock ride height only so he has to compensate for that. Does this sound right to you guys? It's wondering a little bit so he told me to come back tomorrow.

I mentioned the recommended specs provided by MM (caster 4.5 degrees positive, camber .5 degrees negative) and he told me to bring it back in tomorrow with the specs and he would do it again at no charge (after a little argument). I'm running sportlines with the lower isolator removed in the front so I have a pretty good drop. Anyone have any advice before I go back tomorrow?
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 28, 2008
#2
  • May 28, 2008
  • #2
he is an idiot!

i do alignments everyday and i can tell you he has no f'n clue what he is talking about.
camber and caster spec is not affected by lowering. you can make up ANY spec you want and align ANY CAR to it. i can set your mustang up 10 different ways and keep it wearing tires correctly. hell, i can align your car to chevy truck specs if i want to.

tell him you make the adjustments at the plate up top. i know if sounds obvious but he isnt the brightest from what you posted. ask him why the ride height would change the spec to which the car is aligned to.

tell them you want it set up like this

RF LF
camber -0.5 camber -0.5
caster 4.0 caster 4.5

you can set toe to the stock spec. this will keep your car running right

if you want i can PM you my number so i can explain what an alignment is for him. i'm guessing he is using a Hunter alignment rack so i can tell him step by step how it should be done
 

Dr Jay

Member
Jan 1, 2004
134
0
16
Canada
May 28, 2008
#3
  • May 28, 2008
  • #3
Many thanks SaleenGT2001

I was thinking he was an idiot but I didn't want to put my foot in my mouth as I have no experience in this area. I didn't understand why he was saying the ride height had anything to do with it. I was playing along nicely until he said it would probably only be another 1/2 hr labor, and at that point I spoke up and after I made my point he asked the service manager who said there would be no charge tomorrow.

I'll be sure to test him to see if he is adjusting the plates at all
Why is the caster on the LF different than the RF? Again I have no experience so I really appreciate your input.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 28, 2008
#4
  • May 28, 2008
  • #4
the caster is basically how far forward the wheels sit if you were looking from the top.

the car will pull to the side with the least amount of caster. on a perfectly FLAT road you would run an even amount of caster on both sides. however MOST roads you drive on are sloped to the right to allow for rain run off. therefore setting your right tire slightly ahead of your left tire it pulls your car up the road crown and allows the car to drive straight down the road.

i don't know if that will make any sense but thats why you offset caster.

please post up a copy of the specs they print off for you tomorrow.i wanna see if this guy has any clue what he is doing.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 28, 2008
#5
  • May 28, 2008
  • #5



this should help
 

Dr Jay

Member
Jan 1, 2004
134
0
16
Canada
May 29, 2008
#6
  • May 29, 2008
  • #6
SaleenGT2001 said:
the caster is basically how far forward the wheels sit if you were looking from the top.

the car will pull to the side with the least amount of caster. on a perfectly FLAT road you would run an even amount of caster on both sides. however MOST roads you drive on are sloped to the right to allow for rain run off. therefore setting your right tire slightly ahead of your left tire it pulls your car up the road crown and allows the car to drive straight down the road.

i don't know if that will make any sense but thats why you offset caster.

please post up a copy of the specs they print off for you tomorrow.i wanna see if this guy has any clue what he is doing.
Click to expand...

That makes perfect sense to me. He didn't give me anything the first time so I'll be sure to ask for a print out today and post it up.
 

flstang65

10 Year Member
Dec 6, 2007
1,484
135
94
SE Georgia
May 29, 2008
#7
  • May 29, 2008
  • #7
yes, he's an idiot. i had a guy at firestone to do my ex's car. bought the lifetime alignemtn for 99 on sale. this guy was the ****zle.... he would nail any setup i wanted on the first try.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,167
17,862
224
Massachusetts
May 29, 2008
#8
  • May 29, 2008
  • #8
Is there such a thing as a 4-wheel alignment with a Mustang? Or do you get a 2-wheel alignment?

Nothing on the rear end is adjustable, but aren't the front wheels adjusted in relation to the thrust angle of the rear wheels?

SO do I get a 4 or 2 wheel?
 

Dr Jay

Member
Jan 1, 2004
134
0
16
Canada
May 29, 2008
#9
  • May 29, 2008
  • #9
Hey SaleenGT2001, I gave him the exact numbers you mentioned and this is the printout I got back. Am I ok here? The numbers look a little different than what I expected to get in return.

View attachment 316275
 
C

chuck943

New Member
Oct 26, 2002
262
0
0
north carolina
May 29, 2008
#10
  • May 29, 2008
  • #10
Mustang5L5 said:
Is there such a thing as a 4-wheel alignment with a Mustang? Or do you get a 2-wheel alignment?

Nothing on the rear end is adjustable, but aren't the front wheels adjusted in relation to the thrust angle of the rear wheels?

SO do I get a 4 or 2 wheel?
Click to expand...


What you get is what we call a thrust angle alignment. You hook the sensors to all four wheels this finds the center line of the vehicle so you can adjust for the offset in the rear axle( the rear axle on the majority of vehicles are not perfectly centered),see the spec sheet at the bottom posted earlier as thrust angle and also see what his other specs are on the rear wheels. In laymans terms if your rear axle is offset say 1/4 of an inch and u just align the front the vehicle may pull slightly or should I say push one way or the other.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 29, 2008
#11
  • May 29, 2008
  • #11
chuck943 said:
What you get is what we call a thrust angle alignment. You hook the sensors to all four wheels this finds the center line of the vehicle so you can adjust for the offset in the rear axle( the rear axle on the majority of vehicles are not perfectly centered),see the spec sheet at the bottom posted earlier as thrust angle and also see what his other specs are on the rear wheels. In laymans terms if your rear axle is offset say 1/4 of an inch and u just align the front the vehicle may pull slightly or should I say push one way or the other.
Click to expand...

exactly right. you align the front wheels to match the rear in more simple terms
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 29, 2008
#12
  • May 29, 2008
  • #12
Dr Jay said:
Hey SaleenGT2001, I gave him the exact numbers you mentioned and this is the printout I got back. Am I ok here? The numbers look a little different than what I expected to get in return.

View attachment 316240
Click to expand...

does it pull to the right at all??

the toe doesnt look right. the total toe should be no more than 0.32 you will see some edge wear the way the toe is set up

he is using a Hunter aligner. i'm guessing a DSP600

has your car ever been hit in the LF??
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
May 29, 2008
#13
  • May 29, 2008
  • #13
i would pull a little negative camber out of the right side.

i liked to run about 4.5-5 degrees of caster and -.5 camber. i couldve run a lot more, but i drove on the street, and not the track.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 29, 2008
#14
  • May 29, 2008
  • #14
the camber is acceptable. the caster should be a little farther forward on the RF but as long as the car does not pull it is not a problem. caster is not a wear angle.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
May 29, 2008
#15
  • May 29, 2008
  • #15
BDCardinal, is it just me or is the range on the toe WAY more than it should be???? i thought total toe was suppose to be 0.32????

the printout is showing a half degree of acceptable ranges
 
B

bdcardinal

tree hugger
Jun 10, 2003
3,612
16
69
santa barbara, CA
May 29, 2008
#16
  • May 29, 2008
  • #16
thats way more toe than i remember, damn i havent touched a hunter rack in over a year lol. but ya, i think i ran .14 toe on both sides. i could run the caster equal, cause a lot of roads here are flat.
 

Dr Jay

Member
Jan 1, 2004
134
0
16
Canada
May 30, 2008
#17
  • May 30, 2008
  • #17
SaleenGT2001 said:
does it pull to the right at all??

the toe doesnt look right. the total toe should be no more than 0.32 you will see some edge wear the way the toe is set up

he is using a Hunter aligner. i'm guessing a DSP600

has your car ever been hit in the LF??
Click to expand...

My car has never been hit and it drives nice, no pull at all. Couldn't be happier with the way it handles, no complaints at all.
 

Thundermouse

Member
Sep 17, 2003
168
3
18
Decatur, GA
May 31, 2008
#18
  • May 31, 2008
  • #18
That is a lot of toe, but it doesn't surprise me that the tech set it up that way. All three of the 99-04 mustangs that I've had came from the factory with more than 0.25 degrees of toe in on each side. Ford specs are ****ty in regard to the range of toe that they allow (camber too), the maximum Ford toe setting would chew up tires at light speed.

I like to align mine at 0.12 degrees toe in on each side.
 

SaleenGT2001

Well-Known Member
Jul 18, 2005
2,811
4
58
Four Oaks NC
Jun 1, 2008
#19
  • Jun 1, 2008
  • #19
total toe spec is 0.32
 

R.J.

Member
Aug 20, 2003
813
0
16
Warwick, Rhode Island
Jun 2, 2008
#20
  • Jun 2, 2008
  • #20
SaleenGT2001: Does a total toe spec of .32, mean that each side should be exactly .16 each?
Thanks
 
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
Next
1 of 3 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
419
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
Progress Thread Progress Thread- From6to8's 95 GT/Saleen Supercharged 331 install
  • from6to8
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
24
Views
714
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 6, 2026
from6to8
Still need an Alignment?
  • from6to8
  • Jun 1, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
266
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Jun 2, 2025
AeroCoupe
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
245
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
T
What's it Worth? 2002 GT conv/auto
  • tonydetesta
  • Jan 7, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
3
Views
580
What is it Worth?!?!? Jan 21, 2026
Mustang5L5
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?