• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Proper Oil PSI

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67topless
  • Start date Start date Apr 4, 2006

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 4, 2006
#1
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #1
I saw in another thread "GOT THE CAR DONE AT APRIL 3, 2006 11:50PM!!!!!!!!" by 69Rcode_Mach1 that he mentioned he is at 60 PSI and there were some comments mentioning that was high. Ouch... when my engine is cold, I am running closer to 75 PSI, if not a little higher. In addition, when it is hot at ~ 190 degrees, I am still anywhere around 40 PSI at idle. I am using a high volume oil pump... but is this something that is all right, or do I need to address this pressure.

289 with Comp Cams Aluminum Roller Rockers - Comp Cams Hydraulic Lifters - Comp Cams Xtreame Energy cam

Holley 4160 600 CFM - Edelbrock 289 Performer - Hooker Competition headers

Also using Valvoline 10w 30 weight

Thank you for your input,

Scott
 

dennis112

15 Year Member
May 15, 2005
1,561
36
79
Amish Wonderland of Central PA.
Apr 4, 2006
#2
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #2
67topless said:
I saw in another thread "GOT THE CAR DONE AT APRIL 3, 2006 11:50PM!!!!!!!!" by 69Rcode_Mach1 that he mentioned he is at 60 PSI and there were some comments mentioning that was high. Ouch... when my engine is cold, I am running closer to 75 PSI, if not a little higher. In addition, when it is hot at ~ 190 degrees, I am still anywhere around 40 PSI at idle. I am using a high volume oil pump... but is this something that is all right, or do I need to address this pressure.

289 with Comp Cams Aluminum Roller Rockers - Comp Cams Hydraulic Lifters - Comp Cams Xtreame Energy cam

Holley 4160 600 CFM - Edelbrock 289 Performer - Hooker Competition headers

Also using Valvoline 10w 30 weight

Thank you for your input,

Scott
Click to expand...

Your oil pressure is wonderful and you don't need to do anything. Many of us wish we could have pressure like that. You could have easily gotten away with a standard pressure pump instead of the HV. All that you are doing is loosing a tiny bit of HP from the extra load, no biggy.
 

Pathfinder65

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
142
1
0
Ottawa, Canada
Apr 4, 2006
#3
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #3
67topless said:
I saw in another thread "GOT THE CAR DONE AT APRIL 3, 2006 11:50PM!!!!!!!!" by 69Rcode_Mach1 that he mentioned he is at 60 PSI and there were some comments mentioning that was high. Ouch... when my engine is cold, I am running closer to 75 PSI, if not a little higher. In addition, when it is hot at ~ 190 degrees, I am still anywhere around 40 PSI at idle. I am using a high volume oil pump... but is this something that is all right, or do I need to address this pressure.

289 with Comp Cams Aluminum Roller Rockers - Comp Cams Hydraulic Lifters - Comp Cams Xtreame Energy cam

Holley 4160 600 CFM - Edelbrock 289 Performer - Hooker Competition headers

Also using Valvoline 10w 30 weight

Thank you for your input,

Scott
Click to expand...


I'm running similar sort of numbers as you (perhaps 5 psi lower) and have been for years. Nothing wrong with those numbers

Dave
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Apr 4, 2006
#4
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #4
Those numbers are great.

According to a few engine blue printing books I've read, a high volume oil pump is a misconcieved overkill kind of part. They were originally designed as a replacement on an older engine with worn bearings to get more life out of the engine before needing a rebuild.

Now I'm not an expert here, just quoting what I've read. These books claimed in the area of 5-7hp savings by keeping a stock blue printed pump as compared to a HV. Unless you are purposely running a "loose" engine with larger bearing clearances for a particular application.

Just throwing out ideas here, I realize it's a common practice to put a HV oil pump on everything.
 

67topless

Member
Mar 31, 2006
203
0
16
Raleigh, NC
Apr 4, 2006
#5
  • Apr 4, 2006
  • #5
milner351 said:
Those numbers are great.

According to a few engine blue printing books I've read, a high volume oil pump is a misconcieved overkill kind of part. They were originally designed as a replacement on an older engine with worn bearings to get more life out of the engine before needing a rebuild.

Now I'm not an expert here, just quoting what I've read. These books claimed in the area of 5-7hp savings by keeping a stock blue printed pump as compared to a HV. Unless you are purposely running a "loose" engine with larger bearing clearances for a particular application.

Just throwing out ideas here, I realize it's a common practice to put a HV oil pump on everything.
Click to expand...


I've also heard they are unnecessary and I've also heard they can cause problems by pumping too much oil to the top-end and not having enough on the bottom end. But like you, I am no expert and those are things I've heard. I feel very confident that a HV is over-kill in my build and would not use one again for the type of build I have.

Thanks for the input!

Scott
 

Stangninjak

Member
Apr 16, 2004
324
2
19
Apr 5, 2006
#6
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #6
I have read that HV oil pumps can actually be bad for some setups. I was told NOT to use a HV in my 351 build, as the smaller gear could screw up something later..as they have a tendacy to fail..or something like that.

Anyway I am running 45~50 psi on my oil guage when the engine is at normal running temps, and its doing fine.
 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Apr 5, 2006
#7
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #7
I am running about 35 PSI at idle, 45 at cruise on a stock oil pump. Sometimes when I stop the oil slooshes away from the pickup and goes down to about 15-20, then right back up.


This is on a mechanical Autometer gauge


I have also heard something about too much oil PSI and the bottom end not getting enough lube. I also heard about some oil filters grenading... but I doubt you have to worry about that
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Apr 5, 2006
#8
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #8
DJCarbine said:
I am running about 35 PSI at idle, 45 at cruise on a stock oil pump. Sometimes when I stop the oil slooshes away from the pickup and goes down to about 15-20, then right back up.


This is on a mechanical Autometer gauge


I have also heard something about too much oil PSI and the bottom end not getting enough lube. I also heard about some oil filters grenading... but I doubt you have to worry about that
Click to expand...


is it bad when coming to a stop and the oil goes away from the pickup and then my guage drops to 20 and then goes back to 35???? or does it mean that i need to add oil?
 
D

DJCarbine

New Member
May 4, 2005
392
0
0
Apr 5, 2006
#9
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #9
MustangMatt1966 said:
is it bad when coming to a stop and the oil goes away from the pickup and then my guage drops to 20 and then goes back to 35???? or does it mean that i need to add oil?
Click to expand...

When I was almost a quart low, it spiked to zero and then jumped back up on stops, and it also spiked from 20-40 at crusing speeds. On hard stops my pressure still drops when the oil goes away from the pickup, an oil pan with baffles should cure that, but 20psi isn't anything to worry about when its only for a second or so. I tried asking a few people about this, and they said they never really paid attention to the oil pressure gauge when trying to stop... and I can understand why lol
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Apr 5, 2006
#10
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #10
DJCarbine said:
When I was almost a quart low, it spiked to zero and then jumped back up on stops, and it also spiked from 20-40 at crusing speeds. On hard stops my pressure still drops when the oil goes away from the pickup, an oil pan with baffles should cure that, but 20psi isn't anything to worry about when its only for a second or so. I tried asking a few people about this, and they said they never really paid attention to the oil pressure gauge when trying to stop... and I can understand why lol
Click to expand...


haha thanks
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Apr 5, 2006
#11
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #11
My 69' 302 has been running with an HV pump for over 10 years with the same readings as you and no issues what so ever to date FWIW. It may be overkill but I'll worry about what to replace it with when it fails, for now I have no reservations about it really.
 

Hack

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2004
1,945
13
69
Minneapolis
Apr 5, 2006
#12
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #12
One thing about high oil pressure is that you are adding to the load on the distributor gear. The distributor gear will wear out more quickly, and metal shavings in the engine are not the best thing to have.

It's also true that a high volume pump can fill up the top of the engine faster than the oil drains back, leaving the sump empty. I wonder how quickly an oil pressure gage reacts to changes in pressure? Could the pressure drop to zero and come back up more quickly than the gage reacts/produces a reading? I would be very hesitant to run an engine where the gage fluctuates as described above.
 

stangman67

Member
Feb 8, 2003
294
0
17
connecticut
Apr 5, 2006
#13
  • Apr 5, 2006
  • #13
Well ive been running 10 psi at idle for a couple years now, with a max of 50psi at 6500rpm, and its also still holding together. I was concerned at first, but it kinda falls in the 10psi per 1000rpm rule. I'll run it till it blows.
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Apr 6, 2006
#14
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #14
stangman67 said:
Well ive been running 10 psi at idle for a couple years now, with a max of 50psi at 6500rpm, and its also still holding together. I was concerned at first, but it kinda falls in the 10psi per 1000rpm rule. I'll run it till it blows.
Click to expand...


wow, seems a little loe, but to each his own..
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Apr 6, 2006
#15
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #15
stangman67 said:
Well ive been running 10 psi at idle for a couple years now, with a max of 50psi at 6500rpm, and its also still holding together. I was concerned at first, but it kinda falls in the 10psi per 1000rpm rule. I'll run it till it blows.
Click to expand...

That's pretty low, it needs to be atleast 15-20 at idle.
 

milner351

Founding Member
Jun 12, 2002
92
0
0
The Motor City
Apr 6, 2006
#16
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #16
My buddies 69 cougar ran more like 7psi at a hot idle for years before we rebuilt the engine, and there was no bearing damage, but there was normal bearing wear, and some scratches inside the oil pump.

I can't recall exactly, but I think there is a ford spec in my old manuals with a min oil pressure of 10psi at hot idle... but my brain may be playing tricks on me.

As for the low oil pressure spike on hard braking, well, that's a bit weird in a pan with a front sump isn't it? That would mean your oil is actually running up the front of the pan and hitting the crank. The opposite happens on a "drag racing start" where Chevy's with rear sumps have an advantage over us.... I think a baffled pan is a must. I like the looks of my milodon. But my engine isn't built yet, so I can't comment on its in use performance.
 

69Rcode_Mach1

Active Member
Apr 20, 2004
1,473
1
37
Salt Lake City, Utah
Apr 6, 2006
#17
  • Apr 6, 2006
  • #17
milner351 said:
As for the low oil pressure spike on hard braking, well, that's a bit weird in a pan with a front sump isn't it? That would mean your oil is actually running up the front of the pan and hitting the crank. The opposite happens on a "drag racing start" where Chevy's with rear sumps have an advantage over us.... I think a baffled pan is a must. I like the looks of my milodon. But my engine isn't built yet, so I can't comment on its in use performance.
Click to expand...

Yeah I was wondering how a front sump pan can cause a drop in pressure like that. You'd think it would work the opposite way. It is hard acceleration that sloshes the oil away from the pickup. That is why ford switched to the dual sump pans on the 5.0's.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
474
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Engine 347 Supercharge Planning
  • HeatShield
  • Oct 17, 2020
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 27, 2021
Haste347
H
C
98 V6 -> 289 engine swap
  • Cerdman
  • Dec 4, 2018
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
3K
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Dec 10, 2018
Cerdman
C
Engine 78 Mustang Ii Engine Swap
  • 78mIIman
  • Dec 19, 2016
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
6
Views
14K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 21, 2017
RaggedGT
R
  • Locked
SOLD 1964 Weber Carbureted 289 Hipo $10k Firm
  • Robert Campbell
  • Sep 5, 2016
  • Engine and Power Adder
Replies
1
Views
7K
Engine and Power Adder Sep 17, 2016
Robert Campbell
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?