• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Proportioning Valve

  • Thread starter Thread starter Grabber70Mach
  • Start date Start date May 24, 2008
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
May 24, 2008
#1
  • May 24, 2008
  • #1
Trying to finish up the 4-wheel DB swap on my car.
A little back ground, I am using a 2003 Cobra setup on the front and rear. 99-04 V-6 Master Cylinder.

Option 1) A Disc/Drum proportioning valve off a late 60's Early 70's Fairlane/Torino. Number off of valve D00A 2B328 D X

Option 2) A Drum/Drum proportioning valve off a 70 Mustang Coupe Number off of valve D0 A-2B257

Option 3) Just use a "T" to go from the Master to the front brake lines. Then a short peice of line to make up the difference between the old rear line and the master.

Option 4) The valve from the 99-04 V-6, this would require me finding adapters though and possibly having to modify the lines. (My least favorite out of the options.)

All options except #4 I will be using a Wilwood proportioning valve inline for the rear brakes.

Option 1 seems like a direct bolt in, but not sure how this valve differs from the mustang valve.

Option 2 I have some interest in knowing if it would work would need to drill different hole in the apron to mount it. Looks very simuliar to the first valve, for the fronts a input and two outputs to feed the fronts. One rear in and one out.

Option 3 there would be no way to attach the "T" to the apron. I would also have no internal valve to block the fluid incase of a blown line.
 
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
May 26, 2008
#2
  • May 26, 2008
  • #2
if you don't want to mess up with brake tubes don't use valve from SN95. There are metric fittings. If you decide to cut your rear line, definitely go with manual proportioner, which IMO is the most reliable option. Eg Wildwood prop uses 3/8 x 24 ---< type fittings which are easy to install on stock 3/16 line
 
R

rc4mike

Member
Oct 10, 2006
142
0
16
Jun 4, 2008
#3
  • Jun 4, 2008
  • #3
Grabber70Mach said:
Trying to finish up the 4-wheel DB swap on my car.
A little back ground, I am using a 2003 Cobra setup on the front and rear. 99-04 V-6 Master Cylinder.

Option 1) A Disc/Drum proportioning valve off a late 60's Early 70's Fairlane/Torino. Number off of valve D00A 2B328 D X

Option 2) A Drum/Drum proportioning valve off a 70 Mustang Coupe Number off of valve D0 A-2B257

Option 3) Just use a "T" to go from the Master to the front brake lines. Then a short peice of line to make up the difference between the old rear line and the master.

Option 4) The valve from the 99-04 V-6, this would require me finding adapters though and possibly having to modify the lines. (My least favorite out of the options.)

All options except #4 I will be using a Wilwood proportioning valve inline for the rear brakes.

Option 1 seems like a direct bolt in, but not sure how this valve differs from the mustang valve.

Option 2 I have some interest in knowing if it would work would need to drill different hole in the apron to mount it. Looks very simuliar to the first valve, for the fronts a input and two outputs to feed the fronts. One rear in and one out.

Option 3 there would be no way to attach the "T" to the apron. I would also have no internal valve to block the fluid incase of a blown line.
Click to expand...


i was wondering the same thing. I am thinking of using my original 70 disk/drum valve with adjustable proportioning valve when i install disks front and rear. What did you end up doing?
mike
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jun 5, 2008
#4
  • Jun 5, 2008
  • #4
Either option 1 or 2 will work just fine. Just remove the factory restrictor on the rear line. This piece is what makes it a proportioning valve and not just a distribution block. It is not needed if you are installing the adjustable valve and will limit the range of adjustability. They are sized for the weight of the car, type of front and rear brakes, and front to rear weight balance.
 
R

rc4mike

Member
Oct 10, 2006
142
0
16
Jun 5, 2008
#5
  • Jun 5, 2008
  • #5
69gmachine said:
Either option 1 or 2 will work just fine. Just remove the factory restrictor on the rear line. This piece is what makes it a proportioning valve and not just a distribution block. It is not needed if you are installing the adjustable valve and will limit the range of adjustability. They are sized for the weight of the car, type of front and rear brakes, and front to rear weight balance.
Click to expand...

where is the factory restrictor on the rear line? do yo mean the "T" at the rear axle?

thanks
 
T

TenBeers

New Member
Jun 4, 2008
9
0
1
Kingwood, Tx
Jun 7, 2008
#6
  • Jun 7, 2008
  • #6
option 3.....the T works just fine. The only real reason for the proportion valve is if you are racing and running hard IMO.

The only down side you list is "blowing a line" . Let me ask you this..."how often do you hear of folks blowing a brake line?"

I went thru this on my Chevelle with 4wheel disc. wasted a LOT of time configuring the system because all the retailers "SELL YOU" on the idea you NEED it. LOL...that was a 400 hp car, I didn't race it very often and there was plenty of track to slow it down. Point is I bought into the "sale" and thought I needed it. A good ole boy mechanic pulled me aside and said "son.....don't buy s.... you don't need" LOL Laughing at the ole man of course not you or the thread.

IF that is something you like, PST...has some good brackets that mount to the frame, and yes they are pretty cool and it is interesting how well they work.
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jun 8, 2008
#7
  • Jun 8, 2008
  • #7
rc4mike said:
where is the factory restrictor on the rear line? do yo mean the "T" at the rear axle?

thanks
Click to expand...

It's inside the distribution block. The rear line goes into a fitting that is removable (at least on the early proportioning valves), and it's behind this fitting.
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Jun 8, 2008
#8
  • Jun 8, 2008
  • #8
Wanted to multi quote
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Jun 8, 2008
#9
  • Jun 8, 2008
  • #9
69gmachine said:
Either option 1 or 2 will work just fine. Just remove the factory restrictor on the rear line. This piece is what makes it a proportioning valve and not just a distribution block. It is not needed if you are installing the adjustable valve and will limit the range of adjustability. They are sized for the weight of the car, type of front and rear brakes, and front to rear weight balance.
Click to expand...

Thanks for the info. Does the shuttle valve restrict the flow of fluid when it activates the switch for the brake warning light? Or is it just activate the switch?

TenBeers said:
option 3.....the T works just fine. The only real reason for the proportion valve is if you are racing and running hard IMO.

The only down side you list is "blowing a line" . Let me ask you this..."how often do you hear of folks blowing a brake line?"

I went thru this on my Chevelle with 4wheel disc. wasted a LOT of time configuring the system because all the retailers "SELL YOU" on the idea you NEED it. LOL...that was a 400 hp car, I didn't race it very often and there was plenty of track to slow it down. Point is I bought into the "sale" and thought I needed it. A good ole boy mechanic pulled me aside and said "son.....don't buy s.... you don't need" LOL Laughing at the ole man of course not you or the thread.

IF that is something you like, PST...has some good brackets that mount to the frame, and yes they are pretty cool and it is interesting how well they work.
Click to expand...

Thanks I just want to do this the correct way. Your right you don't hear about the brake lines going out often.
 
J

Jimmys66

Founding Member
Nov 28, 2001
419
0
0
Paw Paw MI
Jun 9, 2008
#10
  • Jun 9, 2008
  • #10
Ok, I'm being a little slow.......

I have a cobra set up on my 66 and I used a 94 cobra mc with an inline prop valve on the back brakes.

The prop. valve is wide open and I still can't lock up the rears. My lines are run directly to the mc and this is a manual brake system.

Is there a restricter somewhere in this mc I don't know about?
 

69gmachine

Member
Dec 2, 2004
576
2
19
Southern Maryland
Jun 10, 2008
#11
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #11
Grabber70Mach said:
Thanks for the info. Does the shuttle valve restrict the flow of fluid when it activates the switch for the brake warning light? Or is it just activate the switch?

No, it just makes contact with either side to close the circuit to the brake lamp.
Click to expand...
 
G

Grabber70Mach

Member
Jul 6, 2003
305
0
17
Indian Head, MD
Jun 10, 2008
#12
  • Jun 10, 2008
  • #12
69gmachine said:
Grabber70Mach said:
Thanks for the info. Does the shuttle valve restrict the flow of fluid when it activates the switch for the brake warning light? Or is it just activate the switch?

No, it just makes contact with either side to close the circuit to the brake lamp.
Click to expand...


Thanks.
Click to expand...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

R
Fox Hydroboost conversion/proportional valve
  • RubyRedNotch
  • Jul 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
53
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2026
RubyRedNotch
R
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
88
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
A
SN95 Hydroboost in a Fox | Brake lines
  • arc_jpiv
  • Sep 4, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
344
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 14, 2026
2000xp8
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
197
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
3
Brakes Front brakes sticking - 1988 5.0
  • 302Blue
  • Oct 18, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
516
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 19, 2024
ustacould
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?