• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

QA1 K Member and Control arm fitment?

  • Thread starter Thread starter dimaiox1
  • Start date Start date Mar 22, 2012
D

dimaiox1

15 Year Member
Nov 24, 2008
93
2
9
Mar 22, 2012
#1
  • Mar 22, 2012
  • #1
Hey guys I pulled my kamember and oil pan to change out my bearings. I want to put in QA1 k member and control arms with there coil over kit. Does anyone know if the kit is going tomove the wheels forward and inch and push the wheels out about 3/4 of an inch on each side producing negative camber problems. Right now my car has 99 to 04 cobra control arms and the wheels have some servere negative camber. I dont want to stay with them because once the camber is fixed the wheel are going to stick out in the front.
 

superstang01

Active Member
Oct 11, 2006
448
9
29
Kingston, On, Canada
Mar 23, 2012
#2
  • Mar 23, 2012
  • #2
ive heard bad things about the qa1 k emember.......

if you want to stay with a cheaper k member go with the UPR kit< i have it and its great
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Mar 23, 2012
#3
  • Mar 23, 2012
  • #3
The QA1 will alter the suspension geometry. I believe it moves the front tires back 1" and lower the car half inch. People should know that going in and I don't remember a tag saying that it does when I got mine. Also its the thinnest K-Member made. My experience with TeamZ's K-member is that's its gorgeous (see pic below).

Here is the QA1 for my 94GT.


Here is my car after the QA1 install. You will notice the front is slammed. I took it to Steeda for alignment and they installed stop / rack bushings for me because the 275 tires wanted to rip my inner plastic fender off.


Here is the TeamZ complete front and rear suspension for a FOX body.
 
D

dimaiox1

15 Year Member
Nov 24, 2008
93
2
9
Mar 24, 2012
#4
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #4
I decided not to buy t I don't want to offset the wheels in any way. That being said I want to buy the upr control arms and k member it states a camber plate is needed. I'm assuming the wheels are pushed out a tiny bit at thenbottom just like installing the newer cobra control arms like my car has now, have you guys had bad rubbing or the weeks stick out so far there was a noticeable difference between front and rear wheel width
 

Night Shifter

Well-Known Member
Dec 24, 2005
1,710
27
59
Daytona
Mar 24, 2012
#5
  • Mar 24, 2012
  • #5
the caster camber kit is needed for the coilovers. the strut towers cant handle the load of the car on when sitting on coilovers instead of the springs...its late or id explain it better. plus youd have to cut parts of the coilover assembly for it to fit without caster camber plates
 
D

dimaiox1

15 Year Member
Nov 24, 2008
93
2
9
Mar 25, 2012
#6
  • Mar 25, 2012
  • #6
That makes alot of sense the companies ive been talking to dont have an anser they just say it requiered thats it.
 

vertigasen

Active Member
Apr 28, 2004
366
18
29
Falcon, CO
Mar 25, 2012
#7
  • Mar 25, 2012
  • #7
Also, when you lower the car, you need the caster/camber plates. The suspension pivot point (where the control arms meet the k member) is below the centerline of the wheel. This causes more camber when the car is lowered because the suspension travels in an arc, not straight up and down.

I did my k member with my new build. My builder had a couple k members laying around, a PA Racng and a UPR one. I ended up going with the Team Z one, and I wont look back. Looking at the quality after I got it, I was impressed. I also pulled out the scales (not bathroom scales either) and the Team Z was 2-5 lbs lighter than the others we weighed.



 
M

Mary brown

Banned
Feb 7, 2012
17
0
13
Mar 26, 2012
#8
  • Mar 26, 2012
  • #8
Thanks for this post guys I was going through the same thing.

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox Alignment Suggestions
  • PonyGTrider
  • Jul 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
473
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 13, 2025
PonyGTrider
K
Front wheels not centered in wheel well
  • Kpollard
  • May 2, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
441
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 3, 2025
AeroCoupe
C
SN95 Another Coyote swap list
  • catkiller
  • May 10, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
128
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 10, 2026
catkiller
C
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
419
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
New Products From J&M Products - 1979-1998 & 1999-2004 Race/Extreme Duty Rear Lower Control Arms
  • J&M Products
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • Vendor Sponsor Forums
Replies
0
Views
298
Vendor Sponsor Forums Oct 9, 2025
J&M Products
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?