• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Wheels-Tires Quad shock quandry

  • Thread starter Thread starter gearhead77
  • Start date Start date Apr 22, 2024

gearhead77

Active Member
Mar 13, 2019
128
56
38
Pittsburgh PA
Apr 22, 2024
#1
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #1
Looking for input here:

I like the look of the gold mesh SVE wheels from LMR, so when they finally came back in stock, I bought them. However, in my mobile site ordering frenzy to buy them, I didn't read closely that I had added the staggered setup to my cart (17x9 rear, 17x8 front). My car is largely original and stock and I'm trying to keep it as close as I can. I finally got my car from storage and did a test fit and it's obvious there will be clearance issues. LMR is being finicky about doing an exchange for 17x8's and I'm sure that part of the reason is the wheels are no longer in stock and it took nearly a year for them to come back into stock last time.

So after searching here, these are my options:
- Run without quad shocks which seems about 50/50 on the difference it makes.
-Get the OEM style quad shock, which is thinner than the ones I have on there. Or removing the dust shield from the current quad.
- Get new control arms, eliminating the need for a quad shock (according to LMR, which would like to sell me more parts.)

I'm not entirely opposed to the last option, since doing the work required to replace the control arms would allow me to replace the 30 year old rear springs and associated bushings, which are in OK shape since the car only has 72k on it but still old. And of course, I could just do all the work and replace those bushings.

This car is a cruiser, I'm looking to keep at as close to original as possible, but I do enjoy driving it "spiritedly" on occasion. If upgraded control arms make it better, I'm fine with the upgrade.

Kids, make sure you read closely before clicking buy!
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2268.webp
    608.4 KB · Views: 309
  • IMG_2269.webp
    291.1 KB · Views: 145
Reactions: General karthief

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,881
224
Massachusetts
Apr 22, 2024
#2
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #2
Grab a Gabriel 14039 quad shock on Amazon and test fit it. If it fits better, buy another. If it doesn't, just return it.


I still run quads even with upgraded MM control arms. I had a slight bit of wheel hop and the quads eliminated that.
 
Reactions: gearhead77

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Apr 22, 2024
#3
  • Apr 22, 2024
  • #3
You can just buy a set of oem style quads on rockauto cheap.

Keep in mind, if you are that close to the quad shock, you are probably also pretty close to the exhaust.

I'm all for changing the control arms (to maximum motorsports), just remember each time you make one part of the suspension better you expose the next weakest link.
I wouldn't do them if you don't have subframe connectors, especially on a vert.
And personally my experience with quads is that the car is better with them, than without them.
 
Reactions: gearhead77

AeroCoupe

lube between the nut and the face. I know my lubes
Founding Member
Oct 28, 2001
5,797
3,930
183
Claremore, OK
Apr 23, 2024
#4
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #4
I do not run quad shocks on either car. Maximum Motorsports LCA's on the Coupe and Griggs Racing LCA's on the T-Bird and both car plant really well. There seem to be varying experiences as to running quad shocks but mine without them has been great but I would not removed them if you are still going to run the stock LCA's.
 
Reactions: gearhead77 and General karthief

gearhead77

Active Member
Mar 13, 2019
128
56
38
Pittsburgh PA
Apr 23, 2024
#5
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #5
I’m also thinking of just selling the wheels for now and re-ordering when they come in stock again. If anyone is interested please PM me. I’d prefer local or within an hour or so of Pittsburgh since shipping will be pricey.
 

2000xp8

SN Certified Technician
Aug 8, 2003
8,016
1,613
194
NJ
Apr 23, 2024
#6
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #6
If they fit with stock style quads flipped or with a small spacer, i personally would run them.
It's the tires that usually are the issue, people love to try and stuff the largest tire under the rear, which it doesn't sound like you will do.
 
Reactions: gearhead77

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,972
1,618
153
nevada
Apr 23, 2024
#7
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #7
I bought a used set of Metco upper and lower control arms 16 years ago, they completely eliminated wheel hop. I removed the quads about six years ago and no difference at all. I daily my stang and plant the rear wheels (245/45 17's ) regularly.
 
Reactions: gearhead77 and General karthief

gearhead77

Active Member
Mar 13, 2019
128
56
38
Pittsburgh PA
Apr 23, 2024
#8
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #8
Would
2000xp8 said:
If they fit with stock style quads flipped or with a small spacer, i personally would run them.
It's the tires that usually are the issue, people love to try and stuff the largest tire under the rear, which it doesn't sound like you will do.
Click to expand...
Good point and good ideas. I did get the smaller Gabriel quad, which I’ll try. I’m not keen on spacers but 1/4 inch with a smaller quad and maybe a 265 or 255 tire might just be enough to work.
 
Reactions: General karthief

gearhead77

Active Member
Mar 13, 2019
128
56
38
Pittsburgh PA
Apr 23, 2024
#9
  • Apr 23, 2024
  • #9
nickyb said:
I bought a used set of Metco upper and lower control arms 16 years ago, they completely eliminated wheel hop. I removed the quads about six years ago and no difference at all. I daily my stang and plant the rear wheels (245/45 17's ) regularly.
Click to expand...
Are you using 17x9 on the rears with a 245 tire?
 

gearhead77

Active Member
Mar 13, 2019
128
56
38
Pittsburgh PA
Apr 24, 2024
#10
  • Apr 24, 2024
  • #10
So I'm thinking of doing 235/45/17 up front and 255/40/17 rear. LMR recommends (and if you buy the full wheel/tire package for these wheels, sends you) 245/45/17 front and 275/40/17 rear with the caveat that "modifications may be needed" of the nature we've already discussed.

Messing with an online tire size calculator shows the 255/40/17 is 1.1 inches wider than the stock 225/60/15. For comparison, the 275 section tire is almost 2" wider than stock! All the tires I'm considering list 9" wide as the largest wheel they'll fit. And I'm doing some of this for "thinking out loud" and the benefit for others that might find this thread.
 

nickyb

I gotta say i never painted my nuts, Never Ever
15 Year Member
Apr 3, 2009
2,972
1,618
153
nevada
Apr 24, 2024
#11
  • Apr 24, 2024
  • #11
gearhead77 said:
Are you using 17x9 on the rears with a 245 tire?
Click to expand...
Yes front and rear
 

Attachments

  • IMG_20200417_165439_hdr.webp
    215.1 KB · Views: 119

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,179
17,881
224
Massachusetts
Apr 25, 2024
#12
  • Apr 25, 2024
  • #12
Gabriels are a little thinner, so you might be able to flip them to gain more clearance.

Obviously wheel offset plays a huge role in fit.
 
Reactions: General karthief

Willybill32

But at least it's tight!
5 Year Member
Jul 16, 2019
627
347
83
Lexington, KY
Apr 27, 2024
#13
  • Apr 27, 2024
  • #13
gearhead77 said:
Looking for input here:

I like the look of the gold mesh SVE wheels from LMR, so when they finally came back in stock, I bought them. However, in my mobile site ordering frenzy to buy them, I didn't read closely that I had added the staggered setup to my cart (17x9 rear, 17x8 front). My car is largely original and stock and I'm trying to keep it as close as I can. I finally got my car from storage and did a test fit and it's obvious there will be clearance issues. LMR is being finicky about doing an exchange for 17x8's and I'm sure that part of the reason is the wheels are no longer in stock and it took nearly a year for them to come back into stock last time.

So after searching here, these are my options:
- Run without quad shocks which seems about 50/50 on the difference it makes.
-Get the OEM style quad shock, which is thinner than the ones I have on there. Or removing the dust shield from the current quad.
- Get new control arms, eliminating the need for a quad shock (according to LMR, which would like to sell me more parts.)

I'm not entirely opposed to the last option, since doing the work required to replace the control arms would allow me to replace the 30 year old rear springs and associated bushings, which are in OK shape since the car only has 72k on it but still old. And of course, I could just do all the work and replace those bushings.

This car is a cruiser, I'm looking to keep at as close to original as possible, but I do enjoy driving it "spiritedly" on occasion. If upgraded control arms make it better, I'm fine with the upgrade.

Kids, make sure you read closely before clicking buy!
Click to expand...
Late to the discussion...but I replaced all the struts and shocks (including quad shocks) on my '86 with Bilstein units, then installed the LMR staggered chrome pony wheels in 17X8/9 size with the Nitto tires. I reversed my quad shocks and got enough clearance to avoid spacers.

Bill
 
Last edited: Apr 27, 2024
Reactions: General karthief
J

Jarhead67

5 Year Member
Nov 24, 2018
171
63
38
Windsor Locks, Connecticut
Apr 27, 2024
#14
  • Apr 27, 2024
  • #14
gearhead77 said:
Looking for input here:

I like the look of the gold mesh SVE wheels from LMR, so when they finally came back in stock, I bought them. However, in my mobile site ordering frenzy to buy them, I didn't read closely that I had added the staggered setup to my cart (17x9 rear, 17x8 front). My car is largely original and stock and I'm trying to keep it as close as I can. I finally got my car from storage and did a test fit and it's obvious there will be clearance issues. LMR is being finicky about doing an exchange for 17x8's and I'm sure that part of the reason is the wheels are no longer in stock and it took nearly a year for them to come back into stock last time.

So after searching here, these are my options:
- Run without quad shocks which seems about 50/50 on the difference it makes.
-Get the OEM style quad shock, which is thinner than the ones I have on there. Or removing the dust shield from the current quad.
- Get new control arms, eliminating the need for a quad shock (according to LMR, which would like to sell me more parts.)

I'm not entirely opposed to the last option, since doing the work required to replace the control arms would allow me to replace the 30 year old rear springs and associated bushings, which are in OK shape since the car only has 72k on it but still old. And of course, I could just do all the work and replace those bushings.

This car is a cruiser, I'm looking to keep at as close to original as possible, but I do enjoy driving it "spiritedly" on occasion. If upgraded control arms make it better, I'm fine with the upgrade.

Kids, make sure you read closely before clicking buy!
Click to expand...
Flip the quad shocks. That’ll give you a little more room.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Quad shocks
  • keel
  • May 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
283
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2026
Mustang5L5
Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
M
Bent Rear Spring Perches
  • Miozu
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
341
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 8, 2025
PSKSAM2
P
Suspension End link replacement size
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • May 12, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
115
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 20, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
Engine Hiccup at full throttle
  • keel
  • Jun 2, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
359
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jun 10, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?