• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Question About Platinum Spark Plugs

  • Thread starter Thread starter Quadgod
  • Start date Start date Aug 3, 2005
Q

Quadgod

Member
Jul 7, 2005
41
0
6
Aug 3, 2005
#1
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #1
I've read several posts on here stating not to gap platinum spark plugs. I just replaced my stock factory installed motorcraft platinum plugs with autolite 764 platinums. The gap call for .54 but the plugs out of the package were approx .44. The factory installed motorcraft plugs were gapped to approx .54. needless to say, i regapped the new plugs to .54. Can someone please make sense of this ?
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Aug 3, 2005
#2
  • Aug 3, 2005
  • #2
Make sense of why you should gap the plats? I guess because you stand a decent chance of f'ing up the plat tip. .54 gap is where you want to be without a power adder. Personally, I prefer Autolite copper plugs...cheaper, don't last as long but copper is a superior conductor. Plus I don't mind changing them once a year or so and it gives me the chance to inspect them and really get a good idea about how the motor has been running.
 
K

Kilgore Trout

Fried or Broiled ?
10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
4,749
95
134
Aug 4, 2005
#3
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #3
I think it is specifically the Bosch dual and quad fire platinums that are not to be gapped. I do not think the "do not gap" advice applies to other types of platinum plugs.

Use copper plugs, Motorcraft AGSF-32C specifically... Platinum is for people who do not want to change their plugs as often and are willing to settle for a colder spark.
 

Dark Knight GT

I can't get it up......ok that didn't sound right.
May 26, 2003
3,653
2
56
Ozark, Missouri
Aug 4, 2005
#4
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #4
For a quick recap.

.054 = Ideal for stock and n/a setups
.044 = Idea for boosted conditions.

Copper = Better conductor for spark and thus, better for performance. Live expectancy is shorter than platinum.

Platinum = Better for mileage, but worse in terms of performance than copper.

Iridium = Best of both worlds, but OUTRAGEOUSLY EXPENSIVE!
 

CanadaStang

New Member
Sep 7, 2003
2,093
1
0
Mb
Aug 4, 2005
#5
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #5
You should be fine, just be careful not to chip the platinum coating.
 

twogts4us

15 Year Member
Apr 1, 2004
4,188
12
79
Dunedin, FL
Aug 4, 2005
#6
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #6
Dark Knight GT said:
Platinum = Better for mileage
Click to expand...
What's the theory behind that? I understand you'll get more mileage from them (as in a longer life), but I don't see someone getting better MPG (all things being equal, of course).
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,230
17,913
224
Massachusetts
Aug 4, 2005
#7
  • Aug 4, 2005
  • #7
The do not gap thing is really for those Bosch "waste-of-money" plugs with 16 prongs.

Worst case scenario you gap a platnium plug and scratch the platnium coating off and expose the copper core. Now you have a copper plug basically.

Personally i would save the money on plats and just get coppers to begin with.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
328
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
F
Spark Plugs Caused Rough Idle & Driving
  • firevert
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
387
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 3, 2025
Noobz347
R
What's it Worth? 1997 Cobra, a ton of mods and restoration
  • riored97snake
  • Jun 18, 2026
  • What is it Worth?!?!?
Replies
2
Views
114
What is it Worth?!?!? Jun 21, 2026
riored97snake
R
S
Help with window and possible engine
  • StefRena22
  • Jun 12, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
840
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 21, 2025
Willybill32
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
785
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?