• Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-

Question about the NEW Mustang

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangfan04
  • Start date Start date Feb 6, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
M

mustangfan04

New Member
Jan 28, 2008
1
0
0
Feb 6, 2008
#1
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #1
Does anyone know what year Ford Mustang is going to make the next ratical body change? If you have any pictures or links of what the next body might look like please post. Thanks :SNSign:
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Feb 6, 2008
#2
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #2
Ask this question in the right section of the right Forum and you may get your answer. Thread moved out of 5.0L TECH.
 
E

ex-camaroguy

New Member
Oct 3, 2007
18
0
0
Feb 6, 2008
#3
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #3
2010 is the word i think.
 

SlideWRX

Member
Jan 8, 2007
126
1
16
Westland, MI
Feb 6, 2008
#4
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #4
Yeah, most of the '09 stuff has already been introduced.
 

Stangshark

Member
Feb 2, 2008
50
0
6
Indiana
Feb 6, 2008
#5
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #5
Underneath the Home tab its like the third one down.....
 

red05bullitgt

Member
Aug 15, 2005
861
0
16
Pittsburgh, PA.
Feb 6, 2008
#6
  • Feb 6, 2008
  • #6
mustangfan04 said:
Does anyone know what year Ford Mustang is going to make the next ratical body change? If you have any pictures or links of what the next body might look like please post. Thanks :SNSign:
Click to expand...

If your referring to the next radical body change, as in the next major platform/design change. I was recently informed through a very reliable source. The next platform change won't take place, until the 2014.5/2015 model year, around April 17th 2014. Which will also mark the Mustang's 50th anniversary.

On the other hand, if your referring to the S-197 re-fresh. It's already been confirmed. It will go into production during the 2010 model year, as either a 2009.5 model, or as a 2010. Marking the Mustang's 45th anniversary.
 
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 7, 2008
#7
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #7
I just hope they don't stray too far away from what a Mustang should look like. The cars kind of lost their way with the 94 and 99.
A great example of how not to do that is the Jeep Wrangler and Porsche 911.
 

Dreadnaught

New Member
Aug 5, 2006
31
1
0
Feb 7, 2008
#8
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #8
Agreed Gusin, which makes me worry. With talk of the entire body, save the canopy?, getting an overhaul, and rumor of the new body style taking cures from the Giugiaro...I'm worried. I'm Italian, and that car looks awful; the front just reminds me of the American Godzilla, don't ask me why.

Looks futuristic, doesn't look muscle car.

Time...will tell.
 
R

ranger04

New Member
Jul 28, 2007
245
0
0
Feb 7, 2008
#9
  • Feb 7, 2008
  • #9
With the gas prices are going, they'll probably retro back to the mustang II, 4 cylinder and all hee hee.
 

blacksheep06

New Member
Jan 31, 2006
288
0
0
Feb 8, 2008
#10
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #10
I just hope the Gt's in the future continue to get a V8 despite the new CAFE regulations.
 
S

shooterm1

New Member
Jul 18, 2005
540
1
0
Milford, Pennsylvania USA
Feb 8, 2008
#11
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #11
blacksheep06 said:
I just hope the Gt's in the future continue to get a V8 despite the new CAFE regulations.
Click to expand...

​
 
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 8, 2008
#12
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #12
Probably a V6 turbo based on the stuff that Ford is talking about doing with it's other cars.
 
S

stanmckinney

10 Year Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,188
5
49
Feb 8, 2008
#13
  • Feb 8, 2008
  • #13
If I remember, the 94 was car of the year and also paced Indy. I had one. It was a great car. I don't remember anyone being overly critical of it. Also, what's wrong with the 99 model?
 

jlisle01

New Member
Dec 29, 2004
250
1
0
McAlester,OK
Feb 9, 2008
#14
  • Feb 9, 2008
  • #14
Think of it this way, if they ditch the v8 we'll all have one of the last "real" Mustangs! I can't see it though. Three dollars a gallon or not, Americans still love a car with CAHONAS, comprende?
 

GOLDENPONY

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2002
1,503
0
36
LOVELAND, OHIO
Feb 9, 2008
#15
  • Feb 9, 2008
  • #15
Torque

As a late friend of mine used to say, "People buy horsepower, but they LOVE torque".
 
G

GusinCA

Founding Member
Sep 5, 2002
170
1
18
Newport Beach
Feb 9, 2008
#16
  • Feb 9, 2008
  • #16
I'd have to say our 4.6 is already quite small for a V8, I mean look at the engines from Chrysler and GM.
I think the price of gas will go down when that Green River project really starts producing. We have more oil than the entire middle east right under Utah and Colorado...
 

1.8kmint

New Member
May 31, 2007
47
0
0
Middletown, CA
Feb 10, 2008
#17
  • Feb 10, 2008
  • #17
Sell a v-8 car but have a switch on it so it flips to only 4 cylinders... Say it gets 35 mpg when your on 4 cylinders.... Can you say loophole....Doesnt' the charger have something like that where it turns off half its cylinders when your cruising?
 

Stangshark

Member
Feb 2, 2008
50
0
6
Indiana
Feb 19, 2008
#18
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #18
Well I hope we charge $12.00 a gallon to foreign countries considering what they are doing to us right now! All I have to say is watch Maxed Out and Who killed the electric car to gain an insight to the under workings of our economy, political agenda, and oil controlling the U.S.
 
R

ranger04

New Member
Jul 28, 2007
245
0
0
Feb 19, 2008
#19
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #19
Yeah, they have a cylinder deactivation system, but thats just something else to make an engine more complicated for something to go wrong. The 2010 is to have a dohc 5.0 making 425 hp and 400 ft pounds, but I've heard nothing about it having cylinder deactivation. They did say it should get 30 mpg with direct injection and cvt.
 

Penguin

Active Member
Oct 23, 2003
115
1
28
SC
Feb 19, 2008
#20
  • Feb 19, 2008
  • #20
GusinCA said:
I just hope they don't stray too far away from what a Mustang should look like. The cars kind of lost their way with the 94 and 99.
Click to expand...
You talk about looks, and forgot the 79-93. The one Mustang that had nothing at all that made me think it might be a Mustang. A 2-door Fairmont does not look like a Mustang should. It was the plainest Mustang ever made.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
New mustang owner
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
3
Views
120
The Welcome Wagon Apr 27, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
G
Auto City Classics 67-70 Mustang disc brake kit question/s
  • GOvert
  • Jun 30, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
41
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 30, 2026
GOvert
G
9
1994 Mustang GT 5.0 L Convertible
  • 94ns95
  • Jun 17, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
10
Views
148
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 19, 2026
94ns95
9
M
Body swap on 17 GT convertible
  • Mrklutch
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • 2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk
Replies
1
Views
274
2015 - 2023 (S550) Mustang -General/Talk Nov 2, 2025
I Bleed Ford Blue
N
New Member from New York
  • NYFox
  • Jan 19, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
882
The Welcome Wagon Jan 25, 2026
AeroCoupe
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?