just got my june 06 5.0 & superfords mag. They have a complete section on 94-95 5.0 mustangs. A decent amount of info for beginer stangers. you guys should check it out
reading material
- Thread starter 94GTMOOSE
- Start date
Dan95-5.0
Active Member
any good info? how big was the article?
i saw the review of what was in this months mag, but that was the only thing i wanted to see and didnt want to bother picking it up.
i saw the review of what was in this months mag, but that was the only thing i wanted to see and didnt want to bother picking it up.
three or four pages...its talks about computer problems, and diffrences between the older 5.0s. nothing real special but good info none the less
Dan95-5.0
Active Member
i am not going to tell anyone to run out and buy anything unless i am 100% sure that they are going to love it. But i will say it was nice bathroom reading, and i will read again
WhiteDevil
New Member
Yeah i thought it was cool to read about our cars. But they made it seem like our computers were SOOOOO bad. Put a CAI on it and your car wont even start or something. Also they made it like putting an A9L comp was some kinda of magical cure all for our year that would make it run like perfection.
gustang818
New Member
- Mar 10, 2006
- 48
- 0
- 0
My copy came in the mail yesterday and I'm pissed. I thought they made our cars sound like junk to avoid unless you want endless headaches from any mods. The least the magazine could have done was assign a writer to the story who had some affection for the '94-'95 cars. We're driving overweight, lazy pigs that couldn't pull a fat girl on a tricycle. Did you also see the writer's response in the tech letters section where he said that our computers were an unparallelled automotive disaster? My car's got H/C/I with a stock computer and it runs/idles fine just like many others out there. '05 Mustang & SF should find a writer with the journalistic integrity to investigate and accurately report on a subject. The closest he came was with the links to websites. I can't believe that guy ever owned/worked on a '94-'95 nevermind talk to someone who has. Then there's the hypocrisy factor. '05 Mustang tells us how great the new Mustangs are and (for example) if you change the airbox you need to computer tune them. Why is a computer tune legitimate for the new Mustangs but not for the '94-'95s?
