• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rear end ID tag?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 88 Fox GT
  • Start date Start date Aug 21, 2004

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Aug 21, 2004
#1
  • Aug 21, 2004
  • #1
I took off the metal ID tag thing off of the rear end because I was curious as to if it would tell me a gear ratio. Well, I scraped off all the grime and it did say "2.80" then a space and a bunch of other numbers. Does this tag tell gear ratios? If so, my ratio must be 2.80:1?

By the way, I hope to be pulling the engine sometime this weekend.
 
B

bull999999

New Member
Jun 26, 2004
112
0
0
Aug 21, 2004
#2
  • Aug 21, 2004
  • #2
I hope this link helps:

http://www.blueovalnews.com/store/books/updates/104.0/104.0 axle tags.pdf
 

88 Fox GT

Active Member
Nov 18, 2002
1,674
0
36
Iowa
Aug 21, 2004
#3
  • Aug 21, 2004
  • #3
bull999999, thanks, but that is 1969-70. This rear end is out of a 1966 Mustang.

Or are the codes the same?
 

TobyGaff

Founding Member
Aug 23, 2002
211
0
16
Indianapolis
Aug 21, 2004
#4
  • Aug 21, 2004
  • #4
Yes, that code is the ratio of the rear end.

Above that should be the code for the model of the axle. If it is a WCZ-E it is a standard rear end. If it is a WDJ-B then it is a posi. The numbers to the right of the ratio are the build date, and the plant code, in that order.
 

Cobain03

Active Member
Aug 27, 2003
996
0
36
Lexington, Ky
Aug 21, 2004
#5
  • Aug 21, 2004
  • #5
i got my intake tag off and put it on as a key chain...might take the rear end tag off and do the same...
 
B

bull999999

New Member
Jun 26, 2004
112
0
0
Aug 21, 2004
#6
  • Aug 21, 2004
  • #6
Speed_Demon1965 said:
bull999999, thanks, but that is 1969-70. This rear end is out of a 1966 Mustang.

Or are the codes the same?
Click to expand...

It seems that codes are the same at least in my case. That chart had the code for my diff in the 65 Stang. What's the code on your tag?
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 22, 2004
#7
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #7
I have found that codes change from year to year. If you would like, I can tell you how to find the ratio.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 22, 2004
#8
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #8
Ozsum2 said:
I have found that codes change from year to year. If you would like, I can tell you how to find the ratio.
Click to expand...
Codes might change but ID tags on rearends don't use a code to state the gear ratio they simply stamp the ratio. If it says 2.80 8 it is an 8" ring gear with a ratio of 2.80:1....2.80 9 would be a 9" ring gear with 2.80:1 gear ratio etc. This nomenclature was used for decades and never changed with removable carrier type rearends. If it had been 2L80 8 it would have been an 8" ring gear with a 2.80:1 gear ratio with a locking carrier (posi).
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 22, 2004
#9
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #9
Ronstang said:
Codes might change but ID tags on rearends don't use a code to state the gear ratio they simply stamp the ratio. If it says 2.80 8 it is an 8" ring gear with a ratio of 2.80:1....2.80 9 would be a 9" ring gear with 2.80:1 gear ratio etc. This nomenclature was used for decades and never changed with removable carrier type rearends. If it had been 2L80 8 it would have been an 8" ring gear with a 2.80:1 gear ratio with a locking carrier (posi).
Click to expand...




Thanks, but I was commenting on codes.
 
R

Ronstang

New Member
Apr 4, 2004
1,294
0
0
Houston Texas
Aug 22, 2004
#10
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #10
Ozsum2 said:
Thanks, but I was commenting on codes.
Click to expand...
And you said you could help him find the ratio if he liked and I was simply pointing out that there are no codes to decipher in order to determine gear ratio as listed on the tag. I just thought your reply was a little unclear and implied that the codes had something to do with the gear ratio when they do not. It's all good!
 
O

Ozsum2

New Member
Jul 28, 2004
695
1
0
Aug 22, 2004
#11
  • Aug 22, 2004
  • #11
Ronstang said:
And you said you could help him find the ratio if he liked and I was simply pointing out that there are no codes to decipher in order to determine gear ratio as listed on the tag. I just thought your reply was a little unclear and implied that the codes had something to do with the gear ratio when they do not. It's all good!
Click to expand...


Yea, I was just going to educate him just in case in the future the tag was missing by doing the rotating the wheel and counting the rev of the drive shaft vs wheel rotation method.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
275
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
399
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
354
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
462
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?