• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rear Shocks

  • Thread starter Thread starter Tooncis
  • Start date Start date Feb 24, 2004

Tooncis

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2000
1,221
0
0
San Antonio Tx. USA
Feb 24, 2004
#1
  • Feb 24, 2004
  • #1
Where can I find coil over spring shocks to fit a 65 Stang?
Thanks
 
A

ARTTII

New Member
Jan 13, 2004
272
2
0
Detroit, MI
Feb 26, 2004
#2
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #2
Tooncis said:
Where can I find coil over spring shocks to fit a 65 Stang?
Thanks
Click to expand...

What exactly do you mean by 'coil over'?

Sorry I'm no help but maybe this will get you off the third page and an answer!
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 26, 2004
#3
  • Feb 26, 2004
  • #3
Wait a second, that question was totally clear and precise with perfect formatting. Not the least bit psychotic at all. Are you sure you're the real Tooncis?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 27, 2004
#4
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #4
if you are talking about the rear shocks with the coil springs mounted to them to use in place of your regular shocks and still using the leaf spring rear suspension, monroe sells them, they are the load leveler series shocks, they were about 65 bucks for the pair last time i checked, if you can't find a set locally let me know, i still have pretty connections from being in the parts business fro several years and i think i can get you hooked up with a set, although probabaly won't be cheap, those things are heavy
 

Route666

Active Member
Aug 16, 2003
1,652
6
39
Brisbane, Australia
Feb 27, 2004
#5
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #5
Here's the obvious, and I love how the similarities. TCP is to mustangs as Dillon Reloaders are to shooting. Both may not be the best (but are good quality, no one can dispute) but they are the most well know and used. (Well, maybe TCP isn't the most used, but considering most people probably don't reload, I'd say the proportion is appropriate).


Anyways, TCP have a real coil-over system. Not only that, but the rear suspension setup they have has a much lower centre of gravity than stock suspension, and has allowances for (the necessary in my opinion) torque arm. 5 grand though...

Anyways,
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 27, 2004
#6
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #6
not even a comparison between the 2, the load levelers are a shock with a helper spring, they are most commonly used for towing or where a large amount of cargo is carried in the back, they are sold for just about any car you can think of and they are also used failty often to pick up the back end of a car that has sagging rear springs, which i think may be the reason he was asking about them, i could be wrong though
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Feb 27, 2004
#7
  • Feb 27, 2004
  • #7
bnickel said:
not even a comparison between the 2, the load levelers are a shock with a helper spring, they are most commonly used for towing or where a large amount of cargo is carried in the back, they are sold for just about any car you can think of and they are also used failty often to pick up the back end of a car that has sagging rear springs, which i think may be the reason he was asking about them, i could be wrong though
Click to expand...

So then if you are correct about the reason, would a more direct and readily available comparison be an adjustable air shock then?
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Feb 28, 2004
#8
  • Feb 28, 2004
  • #8
So then if you are correct about the reason, would a more direct and readily available comparison be an adjustable air shock then?
Click to expand...

yes pak you would be correct
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Mar 1, 2004
#9
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #9
Wow, there really is a first time for everything.

Now if Tooncis (or the refined person posing as tooncis) would chime in again, we might just figure out what he's after.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 1, 2004
#10
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #10
hehe, jeez pak you're at leats a few years older than me, and these things have been around longer than i have, i was sure an old codger like yourself would have heard of them, LOL i'll see if i can find a pic of them on monore's website, tune in next time, hehehe
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 1, 2004
#11
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #11
here is a link to moroe's website, it's hard to tell in the pic, but there is a coil spring around the shock.i'll keep looking and see if i can find a better pic somewhere

http://www.monroe.com/products/mp_detail.asp?cat=Sensa-Trac&detail=Load Adjusting Shock Absorbers
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 1, 2004
#12
  • Mar 1, 2004
  • #12
well i tried autozone and advance websites and they don't have any pics of them but they do stock them, i wish i had gone with those instead of the airshocks i ran when i was young and stupid, would've prevented a huge hole in the rear shock tower (body mount) that still isn't really fixed right but it works, so i think i'll just leave it alone for now, like i said it works, it's just ugly but you can't really see it unless you're under the car, so.................
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Mar 2, 2004
#13
  • Mar 2, 2004
  • #13
bnickel said:
hehe, jeez pak you're at leats a few years older than me, and these things have been around longer than i have, i was sure an old codger like yourself would have heard of them, LOL i'll see if i can find a pic of them on monore's website, tune in next time, hehehe
Click to expand...

Hey now, I'm one year older at best, ok maybe a year and a month, but that's it. Honestly never heard of them though. When I first started to appreciate Muscle cars it was in high school, mid eighties, and everyone was going with the big shackle look back then. Plus I never was much for being stupid even while I was young where quality was concerned, (acted stupid plenty of times though and did plenty of stupid things) if I needed new leafs I got new leafs, not a band aid. I'll bet I have seen them, and just didn't notice or never really gave them a second look.

So I'm curious, how would these have helped differently to not cause a hole in the shock tower than the air shocks did? I have still left the air shocks on the back of my car from the previous owner. They are normally almost dry, but back in the day before my garage, when I had to keep all my tools in the trunk, I used to pump them up a tad. Now I'm nervous though.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 3, 2004
#14
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #14
it was more a problem of having the air shocks pumped up almost all the way and driving a friend home down a washboarded dirt road that did it, the springs on the load leveler's will give whereas the air shocks didn't. but still i wouldn't run air shocks if i were you, if you don't need the tire clearance and don't carry anything heavy in it you should be fine with a good gas shock on the back, if you still want a soft ride try the kyb gr2's i heard they are a really decent shock for the money. as far as having to run the air shocks i needed tire clearance and couldn't afford new leafs at the time, after i blew out the tower i had a front strut bushing washer welded in place and then installed those stupid shackles that i didn't want to put on in the first place which is why i went with the air shocks, but hey you live and you learn, right? but now i have a set of 5-leaf mid-eyes waiting in to go in when i get the versailles rear finished and ready to go in, along with some 295/50-15's. and stock shackles with midolyne bushings. i may have to get some of the adjustable "racing" shackles from mustang plus or american pony IF i need the extra clearance but i don't think i will, but i might not have the rake i want either, so we'll see, i'll let everyone know when i get it done, and hopefully i will have a new digi-cam bby then so i can actually get some pics of the beast posted up
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Mar 3, 2004
#15
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #15
OK, I got ya. Yeah, I have been wanting to put some KYB's all around, I just haven't gotten to it. I have a hard time getting myself to replace things that aren't broken when I have broken things to repalce first, ya know. Maybe I'll just do it this year though, I sure don't want any bigger issues to arise.
 

allcarfan

The Answer Man
Founding Member
Apr 8, 2001
2,458
1
56
North Atlanta
Mar 3, 2004
#16
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #16
This thread has been officially highjacked
 

Pakrat

Founding Member
Aug 6, 2000
3,843
0
56
Currently: NH Originally: Rhode Island (and all po
Mar 3, 2004
#17
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #17
Blame it on Toonics for the hit and run thread.

It never fails, when someone asks a question that help replies to right away, the person seems to disappear, and when someone is impatient and TTT's it every hour, no one answers.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Mar 3, 2004
#18
  • Mar 3, 2004
  • #18
yeah pak, i'd say ditch the air shocks as soon as possible, but if you don't put much air in them anyway i wouldn't make it a big rush
 

Tooncis

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2000
1,221
0
0
San Antonio Tx. USA
Mar 4, 2004
#19
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #19
Psychotic Tooncis!

This is the real tooncis-to reasure you guys this is psychotic-I inherited a 1971 MGB wich I'm also restoring it's almost done & on the road. I also have a 1958 Morris Minor I'm doing next.
My Stang has the KYB rear shocks & I installed bolt on springs on them it's working fine & no fender rub on hard bumps I just wanted something more reliable. I work at auto zone now (IT field is dead).
My Stang is really running good
Good to hear from everyone!
Thanks!
 

Tooncis

Founding Member
Jan 23, 2000
1,221
0
0
San Antonio Tx. USA
Mar 4, 2004
#20
  • Mar 4, 2004
  • #20
SHOCKS

My account was paused for e-mail update & I couldnt reply.
If some of you remember my differential is 1" longer on doth sides & I have 15" tires -when I hit a bump my fenders would chomp on my tire sides.
I'm using KYB with some add on springs. this arrangements works really good
but I'm not sure if the bolt on assist springs are reliable. anyone ever use these? There from auto zone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Suspension Harsh Ride
  • PonyGTrider
  • Mar 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3 4
Replies
62
Views
1K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 11, 2026
Noobz347
Suspension Quad shocks
  • keel
  • May 20, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
18
Views
270
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 26, 2026
Mustang5L5
MRT hood struts shocks need replacement - where to get?
  • TTSaleen
  • Feb 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
187
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 10, 2026
Mustang5L5
M
Bent Rear Spring Perches
  • Miozu
  • Aug 18, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
325
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 8, 2025
PSKSAM2
P
6
Hood dimensions 69mustang
  • 69fastback1
  • Oct 29, 2025
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
147
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Oct 29, 2025
69fastback1
6
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?