• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Rear valance modification

  • Thread starter Thread starter HHStang
  • Start date Start date Sep 21, 2005
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Sep 21, 2005
#1
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #1
Please post pics if you have them of any rear valances (on early Stangs) that have been modified with either body kits or any type of ground effects. I have a very low rear fuel sump I'm trying to cover and wanted to see if anyone had done it. Thanks!
 
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Sep 21, 2005
#2
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #2
I have thought about it but it would look stupid without the extension going around the sides to the rear tires. If you did that, it would probably make the side look stupid. Consider making a wrapunder rear valance to go under the car and cover the sump. If you go that route, I would make it attach under the body to make the airflow go smoothly uinder the car and out.
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Sep 21, 2005
#3
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #3
Thanks. That's why I was hoping to see what others have done. I could imagine it looking fugly, and I can also imagine it looking great.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Sep 21, 2005
#4
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #4
I think the fuel cell (sump) sticking out below the rear valance kinda looks cool. I will get a pic of mine and put it up.

Great conversation piece!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

Do some non profit work - That is me on the right!

 

Attachments

  • augustaintspeedwaywhizleonfred.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 81
M

mustangdave

My rearend needs a stud and two nuts.
Founding Member
Feb 26, 2002
2,976
1
56
North Carolina
Sep 21, 2005
#5
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #5
Historic, you should think about an advantage of directing air to where you want it. At road course speeds, it would not be significant, but neither is ten lbs. here or there. Add it all up and then it makes a difference. If you could seal up the rear valance so the air didn't hit a brick wall at the rear valance, it would have to help.
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Sep 21, 2005
#6
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #6
mustangdave said:
Historic, you should think about an advantage of directing air to where you want it. At road course speeds, it would not be significant, but neither is ten lbs. here or there. Add it all up and then it makes a difference. If you could seal up the rear valance so the air didn't hit a brick wall at the rear valance, it would have to help.
Click to expand...

Or, drill large holes in the rear valance (as I have seen) and let the air out. Even witnessed large holes drilled just below the trunk lid to let air out.

My sheet metal is all original (except for the fender lips).

Thanks!

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com

 

Attachments

  • hmtshirt3qw.webp
    2.8 KB · Views: 67

brianj5600

Active Member
Sep 19, 2003
1,964
2
39
Middle TN
Sep 21, 2005
#7
  • Sep 21, 2005
  • #7
I had a bung put on the side of the sump at the back corner. I did not see any good way to do it coming straight out he back. An A1000 is mounted just ahead of the tank about level with the sump outlet. I could not find anywhere else to put it, plus it keeps it low. The feed to the pump makes a gentle 180* bend to the pump inlet. Nothing sticks out past the bottom of the valance. I tried to take a pic, but they did not turn out so good. I'll try again in the daylight.
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Sep 22, 2005
#8
  • Sep 22, 2005
  • #8
Love to see your pics guys. Here's what I don't have in mind though. (No offense please if this is your car)
 
6

65mistress

Member
Aug 17, 2004
405
1
17
Generica USA
Sep 23, 2005
#9
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #9
Hey, that's sweeeeeeet...

The only mods that I've seen on the rear valance is to cut them up, granted louvering them might look pretty cool, make it so that he louvers are opening up instead of down. I don't know how that would affect the air flow though.
 

302 coupe

Founding Member
Mar 2, 2000
1,952
3
36
Macon, Ga.
Sep 23, 2005
#10
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #10
looks like the Ronster
 
H

HHStang

Member
May 15, 2003
566
0
16
Coastal SC
Sep 23, 2005
#11
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #11
here's another...
 

DarkBuddha

Founding Member
Dec 11, 2001
2,215
1
47
Seattle & Tampa
Sep 23, 2005
#12
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #12
Here's one on a '69 sportsroof:

 
6

66Runt

Member
Jun 11, 2005
680
2
18
Sep 23, 2005
#13
  • Sep 23, 2005
  • #13
In keeping with the theme of car pictures posted so far

How about getting some of those trucker mud flaps that say "Keep On Trucking" ?
You could be starting a whole new...er...old theme!

Or, if your pipes come out at the bottom of the valance on each side, you could lower just the center section to match the bottom of the exhaust tips. Put a slight roll at the lip to give it a factory apperance, and some strength, and you wouldn't have to worry about blending it in to the sides. You could also paint the added section with a charcoal color, and it would pretty much disapear.
 
9

91lxVert5.0

Founding Member
Sep 21, 2002
59
0
0
Sep 25, 2005
#14
  • Sep 25, 2005
  • #14
deh deh deh as mencia would say someone needs to be shot for that car use mini truick reverse leds and french them in that would be sick as **** and no one has done it yet i know i'm original
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Looking for a passenger side AC Compressor mount
  • mustangTodd
  • Feb 10, 2026
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Replies
0
Views
90
Classic Mustang Specific Tech Feb 10, 2026
mustangTodd
M
C
Suspension Rear suspension help
  • Clark302
  • Aug 17, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
300
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Aug 17, 2025
Clark302
C
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
379
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
Rear ends? And I don't mean the pretty kind.
  • WORTH
  • Jun 27, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
16
Views
823
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 14, 2025
limp
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
856
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?