Results are in

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#1

• Oct 12, 2006

• #1

All,

Results are in for my 347 Stroker rebuild. 310 HP, 339 ft/lb torque.

Smitty

 

ProKiller

Founding Member

Apr 26, 2002

3,064

15

78

PA

Oct 12, 2006

#2

• Oct 12, 2006

• #2

got a pic of the dyno graph

good numbers, whats your combo?

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#3

• Oct 12, 2006

• #3

I tried to post the pic, how the hell do you do it

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#4

• Oct 12, 2006

• #4

And the combo is BBK 75mm Throttle Body; 30# MAF; Generic Cold Air Intake; 30# injectors; Billet Fuel Pressure Regulator; Trick Flow Track Heat Intakes; Trick Flow Valve Covers; forged cam, crank, etc. (not B303, but same numbers I believe); can't remember the name, but brand name lifters/rockers; stock block bored/stroked; Edelbrock Victor Jr. Heads; Stage 1 Clutch/Flywheel; heavy duty FRPP transmission rebuild; 3.73 gears.

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#5

• Oct 12, 2006

• #5

I think I got it

Here it is

 

Attachments

• scan.webp

  42.6 KB · Views: 151

gcomfx.com

Founding Member

Oct 22, 2002

3,690

0

56

Republic, MO

Oct 12, 2006

#6

• Oct 12, 2006

• #6

What tuner?

 

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Oct 12, 2006

#7

• Oct 12, 2006

• #7

interesting results. I would have expected a little more out of it especially in the torque numbers. The A/F looks good have you had the computer tuned yet? How many miles are on it?

Mine is all together and running. I have about 200miles on it so far. Feels so torquey i love it. I will probably try to hit up a dyno once i cross the 1000 mile mark. If i hit over 340rwhp i will be happy with that my combo is pretty mild.

 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member

Oct 22, 2002

3,690

0

56

Republic, MO

Oct 12, 2006

#8

• Oct 12, 2006

• #8

Oh and what fuel are you guys running?

 

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Oct 12, 2006

#9

• Oct 12, 2006

• #9

gcomfx.com said:

Oh and what fuel are you guys running?

Click to expand...

91

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#10

• Oct 12, 2006

• #10

I'm running 93, and the results you guys saw there were a mix of two bad O2 sensors and a bad idle control motor. They have changed all that and I'll see what the dyno says after that.

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#11

• Oct 12, 2006

• #11

And the computer is SCT tuned by Ed.

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 12, 2006

#12

• Oct 12, 2006

• #12

WhiteDevil,

What have you got after your rebuild? I take it you haven't been to the Dyno yet. I will be in town next week. Take me for a ride and I'll tell you if the pucker factor is the same, LOL.

Smitty

 

WhiteDevil

New Member

Feb 4, 2003

2,717

0

0

San Diego

Oct 12, 2006

#13

• Oct 12, 2006

• #13

smitty_64 said:

WhiteDevil,

What have you got after your rebuild? I take it you haven't been to the Dyno yet. I will be in town next week. Take me for a ride and I'll tell you if the pucker factor is the same, LOL.

Smitty

Click to expand...

haha yeah that sounds good. Just shoot my a PM and we can figure something out. Wed and Fri are good days for me.

 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member

Oct 22, 2002

3,690

0

56

Republic, MO

Oct 13, 2006

#14

• Oct 13, 2006

• #14

smitty_64 - how long did you wait before you chipped the car? I'm trying to figure out if I need to try and get my car to run through the break in period THEN dyno it, or go straight to the dyno and chip it.

 

WhiteStallionGT

Member

Aug 19, 2004

465

0

17

Northern VA / VT

Oct 13, 2006

#15

• Oct 13, 2006

• #15

Solid numbers bro!

 

smitty_64

New Member

May 27, 2006

75

0

0

Oct 13, 2006

#16

• Oct 13, 2006

• #16

gcom,

Ed put the chip in right after the build and those dyno results are only with few miles on the motor. I'll probably have the tune and dyno done again once I have some break in time. I'm curious to see if the O2 sensors were holding it back, because like WhiteDevil said, I was hoping for more out of the build we put on it. Of course, 310 is a lot better than the stock 185 that I did have, lol.

 

gcomfx.com

Founding Member

Oct 22, 2002

3,690

0

56

Republic, MO

Oct 13, 2006

#17

• Oct 13, 2006

• #17

Got ya.... definately curious as to how the second dyno goes. If you start a new thread, throw a link in this one if you will. I'm subscribed and I don't get to check here as often as I wish I could.

 

Black95GTS

Active Member

Jan 8, 2004

1,644

3

38

Marlborough, MA

Nov 7, 2006

#18

• Nov 7, 2006

• #18

bump for relevance to the current topic

 

95Vert

New Member

Aug 19, 2004

1,785

0

0

North Mexico (deep south Texas)

Nov 7, 2006

#19

• Nov 7, 2006

• #19

Am I wrong to think that the 347 should make MORE power than that. My buddy with a 331 and made the same power and I wasn't pleased. Not saying it's bad, but I always thought that if you're going to spend cash on rebuilding your motor, your hp/tq #s should be more than your cubes. But that's just me. You can still take my car though.

 

B

bentley429

Banned

Nov 25, 2004

528

3

0

Connecticut

Nov 7, 2006

#20

• Nov 7, 2006

• #20

95Vert said:

Am I wrong to think that the 347 should make MORE power than that. My buddy with a 331 and made the same power and I wasn't pleased. Not saying it's bad, but I always thought that if you're going to spend cash on rebuilding your motor, your hp/tq #s should be more than your cubes. But that's just me. You can still take my car though.

Click to expand...

I agree, 350 rwhp would be alittle better but there should be even more then that....