• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

Rev limiter: Did I hurt the stang?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 2002BLKGT
  • Start date Start date Jan 29, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

Beau

Founding Member
Jan 29, 2000
3,050
0
0
San Diego
Jan 29, 2004
#21
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #21
GinoGT said:
I've bounced off the limiter a couple of times, just don't let it sit there.
Click to expand...
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jan 29, 2004
#22
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #22
it wasn't a pure race car, it was run in some kind of street legal class. Maybe when the engine torques it pulls against the mounts. I'd kind of like to know if it's true or not too.
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Jan 29, 2004
#23
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #23
Yeah, Ive hit the rev limiter more than I can remember . Its there for a reason, so I dont worry about to much of it.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 29, 2004
#24
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #24
I've read (by an experienced engine builder, forget which forums) that when the rev limiter kicks in, it pulls ALL the fuel out of the engine, not just leaning it out. He said the reason why an engine can be damaged is not because it runs super lean, there's no fuel in the engine at all for it to run lean on. It's because of the huge shocks/forces of the engine going from producing all of this HP, to producing almost nothing, and back again in only fractions of a second. It sounds like the engine almost tears itself apart.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jan 29, 2004
#25
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #25
well hell wouldn't it just be better to pull the spark or even just close the throttle? That doesn't sound good for the engine at all.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 29, 2004
#26
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #26
FallenPhoenix said:
well hell wouldn't it just be better to pull the spark or even just close the throttle? That doesn't sound good for the engine at all.
Click to expand...

Pulling the spark would do the same thing with the "shocking the engine" idea. Plus you would have all this fuel in the cylinder not even combusted, most of it going into the exhaust. I'm sure there's some hippy treehuggers in Washington or the EPA that have laws against that. Then whatever fuel might be left from the un-combusted cycle might make the engine run rich. (Who knows how much would be left behind, I've never heard anyone test something like this.)

Having the computer close the throttle would only be an option on a car with throttle-by-wire. Even then, who knows if that would react fast enough.
 

forpit2000gt

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
2,490
0
0
Columbia, SC
Jan 29, 2004
#27
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #27
I have been into the limiter on launch and at the top of gears. It is not good to hold it there but you are probably alright.

Technically, our cars are electronic throttled. When you mash the gas pedal it only allows more air in and a sensor sends the information as to what position the throttle is in to add or reduce the amount of fuel.
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 29, 2004
#28
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #28
forpit2000gt said:
I have been into the limiter on launch and at the top of gears. It is not good to hold it there but you are probably alright.

Technically, our cars are electronic throttled. When you mash the gas pedal it only allows more air in and a sensor sends the information as to what position the throttle is in to add or reduce the amount of fuel.
Click to expand...

That's just the throttle position sensor. The next Mustang (GT at least) will be a real electronic throttle (drive-by-wire) where a little motor operates the throttle body. I think it's stupid.....one more thing to go wrong.
 

FallenPhoenix

New Member
Nov 22, 2003
911
0
0
Odessa Tx
Jan 29, 2004
#29
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #29
my dad's '03 4runner has the throttle by wire. personally I don't think the pedal feel is very realistic, almost like driving a race car on the computer. There are some good points to it, but like ginoGT said, just one more thing to go wrong.
 

2k2fourpointsix

New Member
Apr 7, 2003
210
0
0
Quincy, MA
Jan 29, 2004
#30
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #30
So is it bad to be bouncing off the limiter when doing a burnout at the track in 1st, or doing a brake stand on the street?
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Jan 29, 2004
#31
  • Jan 29, 2004
  • #31
2k2fourpointsix said:
So is it bad to be bouncing off the limiter when doing a burnout at the track in 1st, or doing a brake stand on the street?
Click to expand...

Just a couple little bounces should be okay. Once you notice yourself bouncing, you should back off. If you're sitting there bouncing, I'd say that's bad.
 

forpit2000gt

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
2,490
0
0
Columbia, SC
Jan 30, 2004
#32
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #32
2k2fourpointsix said:
So is it bad to be bouncing off the limiter when doing a burnout at the track in 1st, or doing a brake stand on the street?
Click to expand...
2nd gear burnouts at the track work better.
 

01BlkGT

Founding Member
Jan 22, 2002
1,015
0
36
ATX
Jan 30, 2004
#33
  • Jan 30, 2004
  • #33
And make sure not to bounce off the rev limiter if you are blown...... You should be fine, I've done it a few times and the car still runs like a champ. Just dont make it a habit.
 

Mustang92

SN's #1 1%er
Jun 6, 2001
6,467
2
79
South Florida
Feb 2, 2004
#34
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #34
A few times revving it past the limiter shouldn't hurt anything. Last week in the rain someone cut me off and my horn didn't work so I revved the motor up so they knew I was pissed and the limiter didn't catch it in time and it cruised up to 7K real quick. Personally I believe with proper maintenance these motors can handle a lot. I now launch my car at 6500 RPM sitting on the rev limiter (I moved it up past the 6050 stock limiter).

Bill
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Feb 2, 2004
#35
  • Feb 2, 2004
  • #35
Mustang92 said:
...so I revved the motor up so they knew I was pissed...
Click to expand...

Been there, done that. It's nice having the ability to express yourself with RPM's.
 
S

stang9300

New Member
Jan 14, 2004
111
0
0
North Carolina
Feb 3, 2004
#36
  • Feb 3, 2004
  • #36
To hell with it. My engine has 70K miles on it and I have hit my rev limiter too many times to count, when the auto tranny doesn't shift fast enough when I am manually shifting it, or when the tires break loose in first or second gear it tends to jump in rpms too fast. The limiter is there for a reason, use it.
 
C

CharlieHustle

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
35
0
0
Houston,Tx
Mar 12, 2004
#37
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #37
hitting the rev limiter with a diablo chip

I have an automatic 2000 Gt, with a diablo chip installed. When I floor it at the track I always hit the rev limiter. Before I had the chip installed, I never had this problem. If I give it about 3/4ths gas it will shift fine. There is no way that I can floor it, without redlining. The only way to come out of the "red" is to let off the gas. The car will not shift at all. The car runs a 14.0 with the chip turned off, and a 14.6-15.0 with the chip on. The chip is brand new and programmed by rpmoutlet.com. A local performance shop said to try having the transmission fluid changed. Does anyone think that will help? The car has 56k miles on it. Thanks
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Mar 12, 2004
#38
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #38
CharlieHustle said:
I have an automatic 2000 Gt, with a diablo chip installed. When I floor it at the track I always hit the rev limiter. Before I had the chip installed, I never had this problem. If I give it about 3/4ths gas it will shift fine. There is no way that I can floor it, without redlining. The only way to come out of the "red" is to let off the gas. The car will not shift at all. The car runs a 14.0 with the chip turned off, and a 14.6-15.0 with the chip on. The chip is brand new and programmed by rpmoutlet.com. A local performance shop said to try having the transmission fluid changed. Does anyone think that will help? The car has 56k miles on it. Thanks
Click to expand...

If it works right without the chip, and screws up with the chip.............sounds like it's the chip. Changing the tranny fluid wouldn't do anything.
 
C

CharlieHustle

New Member
Jan 3, 2004
35
0
0
Houston,Tx
Mar 12, 2004
#39
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #39
chip

this is the second diablo chip ive had installed. the first one was used, so i sold it, and bought a brand new one. now im having the same exact problem. anyone have any ideas how to fix it? or if i get rid of the chip, how much does a speedcal cost since i have the 3.73? thanks
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Mar 12, 2004
#40
  • Mar 12, 2004
  • #40
CharlieHustle said:
this is the second diablo chip ive had installed. the first one was used, so i sold it, and bought a brand new one. now im having the same exact problem. anyone have any ideas how to fix it? or if i get rid of the chip, how much does a speedcal cost since i have the 3.73? thanks
Click to expand...

You need a chip, reflash, or a programmer since you have an automatic. Only manuals can use the speedcal.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
351
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
G
Help! 93 Mustang 2.3L A4LD dies at idle
  • goofyfoot53
  • Nov 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
149
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
goofyfoot53
G
J
Switched to e85 on the 3v and now it won't run right.
  • jcowdough
  • Aug 24, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
168
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Aug 24, 2025
Noobz347
Removing speedo cable from the VSS
  • 91AOD5.0LX
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
27
Views
875
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
91AOD5.0LX
E
2007 GT Stalls when lights or a/c turned on
  • ejscarfo
  • Jun 22, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
2
Views
137
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 29, 2026
ejscarfo
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?