• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Ricer vs 2.3T, lmao

  • Thread starter Thread starter Mr. Merk
  • Start date Start date Aug 20, 2005

Mr. Merk

New Member
Aug 5, 2005
72
0
0
NW Arkansas
Aug 20, 2005
#1
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #1
LINK

read all of it, it was great!
 
H

Hamburglar

New Member
Jun 14, 2003
33
0
0
IOWA
Aug 20, 2005
#2
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #2
 

Shawneebear93

20+ Year Stangneter
May 4, 2004
518
17
49
Salisbury Twp, Allentown, PA
Aug 20, 2005
#3
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #3
Some people are so ignorant (even I almost bought a Prelude). Just kidding, Hondas are good cars if you do it right, but too many people don't and that goes for cars of all makes.
 

79'293stang

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
505
11
29
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Aug 20, 2005
#4
  • Aug 20, 2005
  • #4
wow that guy is retarded, does he forget perty much every engine is still running on a concept that is over a hundred years old no matter what fancy gismos you strap on top of it.
 
W

Willy0314

New Member
Jun 3, 2004
178
0
0
Western Ny
Aug 21, 2005
#5
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #5
what were u even doing on that board?
 

Mr. Merk

New Member
Aug 5, 2005
72
0
0
NW Arkansas
Aug 21, 2005
#6
  • Aug 21, 2005
  • #6
i'm a mod, its also known as nwamotorsports

i've been there since the beginning, waaaay before my 2.3T days
 
B

BELL

Founding Member
Feb 21, 2002
722
0
0
California
Aug 22, 2005
#7
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #7
i had to read it all before i realized it was giant flame war.... when will these import car owners learn?
 

TMX

New Member
May 24, 2005
0
0
0
Houston
Aug 22, 2005
#8
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #8
And remember, these people drive with aluminum...I've seen a ford 2.3T push 35+psi and the only thing it did was blow the stock headgasket (I think it was the 4 Banger project) and I doubt some aluminum head can handle 35psi, a 338% increase in power. That same car also ran in the 10s later on I think it said, maybe faster if someone wants to correct me, and for a 3500lb car it takes at least 520 hp to run a 10.998 according to formulas so it could be off some.
 

Stinger

Founding Member
Jul 7, 2001
7,754
24
118
Basehor (Kansas City), KS
Aug 22, 2005
#9
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #9
Well, the 4 Banger project ran low 12's, not 10's. It's also closer to 2600-2700 pounds. Probably 350hp or so.
 

TMX

New Member
May 24, 2005
0
0
0
Houston
Aug 22, 2005
#10
  • Aug 22, 2005
  • #10
Well I did a search to find the car I was thinking about. This thread has a post with a video of a 9.3s SVO: http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=538917 or just click this link for the video: http://projecthp.ford23.com/Videos/2.3T9.30SVOJDB.mpeg That just shows the power and potential of the ford 2.3 block.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Fox vs Ferrari
  • nicholase
  • Apr 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
101
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 13, 2026
gkomo
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
F
Difference between 83-86 EFI and 87-97 gas tanks?
  • ForeverDrivin
  • Mar 30, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
240
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 30, 2026
ForeverDrivin
F
1990 Mustang with no-start condition - Fixed and how-to
  • TTSaleen
  • Mar 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
120
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 22, 2026
TTSaleen
H
Best tire size for 91 Fox 18x9 wheels. On coilovers
  • hassler
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
409
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?