• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Rocker Shims

  • Thread starter Thread starter JD1964
  • Start date Start date Feb 23, 2014

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Feb 23, 2014
#1
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #1
In my engine upgrade process I'll be installing Ford Racing pedestal type 1.7 roller rockers. The GT40 heads will also be milled .030 so I think I want to shim the rockers when I install them.

The kits I see available have 32 shims including 16 .030 and 16 .060. Is this basically my only choice or are there kits with other size shims also available?

I know there is a certain amount of tolerance and variance in the lifter pre-load on hydraulic lifters. What is the acceptable range of pre-load?

I know this aint rocket science but I don't wanna take it apart a second time (at least not for a while anyway). After all, when do we ever stop taking thing apart again?
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,289
1,632
214
Acworth, GA
Feb 23, 2014
#2
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #2
Shimming the rockers will throw your geometry off. With the heads milled, the relation of the tip of the rocker to the valve will be the same. In order to correct the valve geometry for a milled head, you need to get shorter pushrods, not bring the rocker up. The preload range is actually pretty large. What I would do is assemble the engine first, then do a geometry test to see if it is off. If it is, then order the correct pushrod length to correct it. Shimming the rocker up will definitely not fix the problem, it will only make it worse.

Kurt
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Feb 23, 2014
#3
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #3
Shimming of pedestal rockers is used when you can't get proper preload within lets say a 1/2 turn after zero lash, not to adjust the height or acheive proper geometry or swipe You can try using a thicker head gasket, but as Kurt said you should get a pushrod length checker. That will ensure proper geometry. Then if needed, add shims for proper preload.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Feb 23, 2014
#4
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #4
I will put it together and see how things size up. I would be using the shims to adjust preload (if needed) as directed in the instructions that came with the rocker arms. I'm using a stock cam so I doubt a .030 shim is going to change the geometry enough to cause a problem. After all, why would the instructions written by Ford Racing indicate that shims may be needed. Milling the head is going to add lifter preload to a pedestal type rocker setup. As noted in the instructions, the shims are used to correct excessive preload.

Here are the instructions that came with the kit. These rockers are sold as direct replacements for stock pedastal type rockers. Look at step 6 and 7 for the shim instruction.

 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Feb 23, 2014
#5
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #5
John, you essentially confirmed what I said, in that the shims are used to adjust preload. You removed .030 of material from the head surface, so to ballpark that would require .030 shorter pushrod or as I said a thicker head gasket to keep the same geometry.

Have you checked the swipe on the valve tip with the stock pushrods?
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Feb 23, 2014
#6
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #6
mikestang63 said:
John, you essentially confirmed what I said, in that the shims are used to adjust preload. You removed .030 of material from the head surface, so to ballpark that would require .030 shorter pushrod or as I said a thicker head gasket to keep the same geometry.

Have you checked the swipe on the valve tip with the stock pushrods?
Click to expand...

No but worth noting. Not back together yet.

But again, the instructions that came with the rockers say to use shims to correct preload if needed. They dont say anything about the shims affect on geometry. If it were a critical thing in the intended application of the part, why would they not mention it?
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Feb 23, 2014
#7
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #7
They were likely assuming all things being equal that the builder has covered all ptv issues including push rod length. The shims are merely there to ensure proper preload as said previously.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Feb 23, 2014
#8
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #8
Michael Yount’s valve adjustment procedure

Here's an easy way to determine this. Start with the #1 cylinder. Rotate the engine with a ratchet on the crank bolt clockwise. Watch the #1 pushrods. First the exhaust pushrod will rise and fall signaling what would be the exhaust valve opening and closing if the rocker were on. As it closes the intake pushrod will rise -- keep rotating clockwise until the intake pushrod falls and is level with the exhaust pushrod - both at the same height. Both lifters are now on the base circle of the cam - both valves would be closed if the rockers were on.

Now, install both rockers. Tighten the bolts with one hand while rocking the rocker with the other hand - continue until you reach the point where you can't 'rock' the rocker any more because there's no gap on the valve stem end or the pushrod end. You are at zero lash - i.e. - no gaps. Stop tightening just as you reach this point.

Now, put your torque wrench on the bolt and tighten it to 18-20 ft-lbs while counting the number of turns it takes to reach the torque. You should hit the torque within 1/4 to 1 turn of the bolt. If it takes more than 1 turn, use a shim to raise the rocker -- each .030" shim will reduce the number of turns to torque by about 1/4 turn. If you reach the torque in less than a 1/4 turn, or you have trouble reaching zero lash even at full torque, then you'll either need longer pushrods, or to CAREFULLY remove some material from the bottom of the rocker fulcrum. Using the procedure described above, you will work through the remaining 7 pairs of rockers. If you follow the firing order, it will minimize the manual cranking you have to do to get the lifters on the base circle of the cam prior to installation of the next pair.

When I first went through mine, 13 of them took no shims; 3 of them took 1 .030" shim. Upon cranking it up, one or two of them sounded a bit noisier than I thought was right, so with the engine hot, I pulled the upper off, and the valve covers, and went through the installation procedure again. That time, 11 of them took no shims; 4 of them took one .030", and one of them took one .060" shim. And they were very quiet running.

Good luck with it.
__________________
Michael Yount - K'ville,TN 82 Volvo 242w/5.0L; 2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Feb 23, 2014
#9
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #9
jrichker said:
Michael Yount’s valve adjustment procedure

Here's an easy way to determine this. Start with the #1 cylinder. Rotate the engine with a ratchet on the crank bolt clockwise. Watch the #1 pushrods. First the exhaust pushrod will rise and fall signaling what would be the exhaust valve opening and closing if the rocker were on. As it closes the intake pushrod will rise -- keep rotating clockwise until the intake pushrod falls and is level with the exhaust pushrod - both at the same height. Both lifters are now on the base circle of the cam - both valves would be closed if the rockers were on.

Now, install both rockers. Tighten the bolts with one hand while rocking the rocker with the other hand - continue until you reach the point where you can't 'rock' the rocker any more because there's no gap on the valve stem end or the pushrod end. You are at zero lash - i.e. - no gaps. Stop tightening just as you reach this point.

Now, put your torque wrench on the bolt and tighten it to 18-20 ft-lbs while counting the number of turns it takes to reach the torque. You should hit the torque within 1/4 to 1 turn of the bolt. If it takes more than 1 turn, use a shim to raise the rocker -- each .030" shim will reduce the number of turns to torque by about 1/4 turn. If you reach the torque in less than a 1/4 turn, or you have trouble reaching zero lash even at full torque, then you'll either need longer pushrods, or to CAREFULLY remove some material from the bottom of the rocker fulcrum. Using the procedure described above, you will work through the remaining 7 pairs of rockers. If you follow the firing order, it will minimize the manual cranking you have to do to get the lifters on the base circle of the cam prior to installation of the next pair.

When I first went through mine, 13 of them took no shims; 3 of them took 1 .030" shim. Upon cranking it up, one or two of them sounded a bit noisier than I thought was right, so with the engine hot, I pulled the upper off, and the valve covers, and went through the installation procedure again. That time, 11 of them took no shims; 4 of them took one .030", and one of them took one .060" shim. And they were very quiet running.

Good luck with it.
__________________
Michael Yount - K'ville,TN 82 Volvo 242w/5.0L; 2000 Suzuki Bandit 1200
Click to expand...


Thanks for the extra info and I totally understand the procedure.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Feb 23, 2014
#10
  • Feb 23, 2014
  • #10
stykthyn said:
They were likely assuming all things being equal that the builder has covered all ptv issues including push rod length. The shims are merely there to ensure proper preload as said previously.
Click to expand...

If custom length push rods were part of an engine build and done correctly, there should be no need for shimming to correct lifter preload on pedestal stlye rockers.

I still do not agree that shimming these pedestal style rockers as instructed by the part manufacturer is going to mess up the valve train geometry. Remember, I'm running a stock cam and replacing stock pedestal rockers with pedestal roller rockers. Shimming .030 to compensate for .030 milling isn't going to hurt a thing in my opinion.
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Feb 24, 2014
#11
  • Feb 24, 2014
  • #11
Only one way to find out
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Feb 24, 2014
#12
  • Feb 24, 2014
  • #12
John Dirks Jr said:
If custom length push rods were part of an engine build and done correctly, there should be no need for shimming to correct lifter preload on pedestal stlye rockers.

I still do not agree that shimming these pedestal style rockers as instructed by the part manufacturer is going to mess up the valve train geometry. Remember, I'm running a stock cam and replacing stock pedestal rockers with pedestal roller rockers. Shimming .030 to compensate for .030 milling isn't going to hurt a thing in my opinion.
Click to expand...
I really think you are completely discounting all of the good advice from above. It seems to me that you have made up your mind about the best way to go about things so why bother even asking for everyone's opinion? I don't mean to sound brash here but if you don't intend on heading the advice from other members then don't bother asking questions when you may not like the answer you recieve.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Feb 24, 2014
#13
  • Feb 24, 2014
  • #13
84Ttop said:
I really think you are completely discounting all of the good advice from above. It seems to me that you have made up your mind about the best way to go about things so why bother even asking for everyone's opinion? I don't mean to sound brash here but if you don't intend on heading the advice from other members then don't bother asking questions when you may not like the answer you recieve.
Click to expand...


I just got back from dropping the heads off at a well know area machine shop to be milled. The experienced engine builder shared the concern about how milling the heads changes things. He asked a few more questions about my intentions including what cam I would be running. I told him the cam would remain stock but I was adding the 1.7 pedestal roller rockers. I told him I would be shimming the rocker arms to ensure proper lifter preload and he agreed with my plan.

You said why bother asking a question if I don't like the answer? First of all, how would I be able to agree or disagree with any answer unless I first asked a question? Second, if you go and read my initial post, you will see I did not ask a question about valve train geometry or how shimming might affect it. I asked what shim kits are available and what is acceptable lifter preload range.

The persons who responded took the thread in a different direction. Don't get me wrong because if someone thinks I'm about to make a big mistake, I appreciate their opinion. In the case of this discussion (which went in a different direction - not by me), I just happen to disagree that shimming to ensure proper lifter preload is going to cause a problem in my application.

I thank all who respond to my posts and take no offense to differing opinions.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Feb 24, 2014
#14
  • Feb 24, 2014
  • #14
View: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6zXDo4dL7SU
 

84Ttop

They make new pistons every day, so why worry?
5 Year Member
Jul 2, 2009
5,222
3,254
204
South Jersey
Feb 24, 2014
#15
  • Feb 24, 2014
  • #15
How very dramatic @madspeed lol
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
133
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
692
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
409
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Yesterday at 8:57 AM
TPony
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Saturday at 3:39 PM
427nostang
4
E
Finished my Fox Hydroboost Install - Tips
  • Engineer Duane
  • Apr 9, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2025
Engineer Duane
E
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?