• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

rod bearing clearances using .001 bearings

  • Thread starter Thread starter dastang2
  • Start date Start date Jan 2, 2006

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 2, 2006
#1
  • Jan 2, 2006
  • #1
hello, i got a crank from a good machine shop that mic'd the crank and said it is still std. but to use .001 bearings on it. i think that is just for the rods. so i did and put it in my other block. it has been a good while,over a year since i turned the motor by hand. i do not remember if i could or not without using a wrench. now i got a different motor that i decided to change the crank and bearings on. so i took the crank out of the old block along with the good never used bearings. i put them in this new block and now i can only turn the crank with a wrench.(remember that i can not remember if i used a wrench or not but i think i did.) i torqued the rods to 40 but i have an old torque wrench that only has a pointer on it and i think it is bad now since i snapped a rod stud with less than 40 psi as the wrench said. i am using lube. i plastigauged the bearings again as i did when i put the .001 bearings on with the crank in the old block and it was the same as what i got before. .015 is what it came out to be for rod bearing clearance and i was told this was an acceptable clearance. i did take the rod bearing out and look at them again and no wear, so i am thinking i just need a better torque wrench. i was thinking this is just going to be a tight clearance motor and may need thin oil for a while or something. can anybody help me out here. thanks. the new shortblock i have turned by hand but it also had some moderate wear on the main and rod bearings. i did nothing else but change bearings and crank.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 2, 2006
#2
  • Jan 2, 2006
  • #2
it measured out to be .002 of an inch in the main bearings. is this a good clearance.

checked the rod clearance and got .0015 and no taper at all, i heard this is good. is it

this is a post from a different site that i looked up from. maybe it was .0015 of an inch instead of.015 of an inch. i may have forgotten ot misread the sheet of paper that came with the plastigauge. thanks all.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 2, 2006
#3
  • Jan 2, 2006
  • #3
ttt please
 

retro50

New Member
Jul 15, 2003
191
0
0
Plymouth,MA
Jan 2, 2006
#4
  • Jan 2, 2006
  • #4
Are they stock rod bolts? If so then 24 ft lbs. is the torque spec not 40. The clearances are o.k.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Jan 2, 2006
#5
  • Jan 2, 2006
  • #5
.002 on the mains is the happy medium for a performance street engine. Race engines usually have ~.0025 and stock engines are tighter at ~.0015. The rods are about right.

40lbs is too much for the rod bolts. It shouldnt have broken, though. A decent beam torque wrench works fine and they take ALOT of abuse before wearing out. Craftsmans are only ~$30.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 3, 2006
#6
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #6
really ony 25, i was looking at a book i have with specs and it says 40-45 psi. that should be my problem right there. i did however borrow a better wrench from autozone and i am going to complete the bottom end today. thank you all.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 3, 2006
#7
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #7
those specs are at 40 psi i am going to take another look really quick but thanks. i am relieved, i may have looked on the wrong line since all the numbers are bunched up.
 

dastang2

Active Member
Dec 11, 2003
2,020
0
46
tx
Jan 3, 2006
#8
  • Jan 3, 2006
  • #8
ok sure enough i was looking at the wrong info, you think the clearances i got will still be the same with the torque i should be using.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

J
MEED HELP!! 86 mustang
  • Jacob0121
  • Jan 23, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
344
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 25, 2026
CAMTWO1070
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
576
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
8
Electrical Crank-no start ... no spark ... no injector pulse, was it something I did? (redux)
  • 85gtCOBRA
  • Oct 28, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
569
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 29, 2025
85gtCOBRA
8
89 LX Electrical Troubles
  • fun331
  • Oct 25, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
353
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 27, 2025
fun331
G
4.6L rods and piston into a 5.4L
  • Green mustang
  • Jun 11, 2025
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
237
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 11, 2025
Green mustang
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?