• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

roller pitman/idler

  • Thread starter Thread starter skywalker
  • Start date Start date Jul 23, 2005
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Oct 4, 2005
#21
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #21



I had one of those K8158 here to look at. It has grease fittings at each end and will not take a roller kit. I tried to move the drag link end of the thing (right side) and I couldn't. I'm not sure what they have in there. If I wanted a roller idler arm on a later car, I would use two roller kits with an original type arm. One at each end. I believe the bushings are diffenent at each end, so it would take two different kits. The K8158 would have more bind than a true roller bearing arm IMO. With that said, the K8158 would have to be better than an early style arm from a daily driver standpoint. If someone has a used idler arm from a 67-68 Mustang, I could use one for some R&D work.


John
 

Jester67

Member
Sep 21, 2004
908
1
18
TN
Oct 4, 2005
#22
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #22
Opentracker said:



I had one of those K8158 here to look at. It has grease fittings at each end and will not take a roller kit. I tried to move the drag link end of the thing (right side) and I couldn't. I'm not sure what they have in there. If I wanted a roller idler arm on a later car, I would use two roller kits with an original type arm. One at each end. I believe the bushings are diffenent at each end, so it would take two different kits. The K8158 would have more bind than a true roller bearing arm IMO. With that said, the K8158 would have to be better than an early style arm from a daily driver standpoint. If someone has a used idler arm from a 67-68 Mustang, I could use one for some R&D work.


John
Click to expand...

I will send you mine when it comes off but that will be a little while say 2 months
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Oct 4, 2005
#23
  • Oct 4, 2005
  • #23
Thank you but I would like to work on one soon. Just a junk piece with two worn bushings would be great. Something I can try and fit roller kit's into. They made a PS and manual arm, I'd like to get both done.

John
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Nov 19, 2005
#24
  • Nov 19, 2005
  • #24
Opentracker said:
Thank you but I would like to work on one soon. Just a junk piece with two worn bushings would be great. Something I can try and fit roller kit's into. They made a PS and manual arm, I'd like to get both done.

John
Click to expand...

Hey John, did you ever do any development on this?

Joe
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Nov 19, 2005
#25
  • Nov 19, 2005
  • #25
oops, my bad, later thread:
http://forums.stangnet.com/showthread.php?t=587936&highlight="roller+idler+arm"
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Nov 20, 2005
#26
  • Nov 20, 2005
  • #26
I bought an idler arm that has the same bushing as the new Moog K8158. I put it in the vise and the end with the sleeve turned nice and smooth. I think the other arm I looked at was stuck from the factory. I would say that other that an original arm with two roller kits, the K8158 is the idler arm to use for the 67-up cars. I am having no luck putting roller kits in original arms so the Moog arm may be the only choice. We'll see.


John
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Nov 20, 2005
#27
  • Nov 20, 2005
  • #27
Opentracker said:
I bought an idler arm that has the same bushing as the new Moog K8158. I put it in the vise and the end with the sleeve turned nice and smooth. I think the other arm I looked at was stuck from the factory. I would say that other that an original arm with two roller kits, the K8158 is the idler arm to use for the 67-up cars. I am having no luck putting roller kits in original arms so the Moog arm may be the only choice. We'll see.


John
Click to expand...

Just another datapoint on a 67, manual steering car....here's mine:


 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Nov 25, 2005
#28
  • Nov 25, 2005
  • #28
Opentracker said:



I had one of those K8158 here to look at. It has grease fittings at each end and will not take a roller kit. I tried to move the drag link end of the thing (right side) and I couldn't. I'm not sure what they have in there. If I wanted a roller idler arm on a later car, I would use two roller kits with an original type arm. One at each end. I believe the bushings are diffenent at each end, so it would take two different kits. The K8158 would have more bind than a true roller bearing arm IMO. With that said, the K8158 would have to be better than an early style arm from a daily driver standpoint. If someone has a used idler arm from a 67-68 Mustang, I could use one for some R&D work.


John
Click to expand...

Here's a bit more info for 67ers like me....
I confirmed that the Moog K8158 is for PS cars.
Moog makes one similar for manual steering cars like mine, K8161.
Here's some pics below, as compared with my original.



 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Nov 26, 2005
#29
  • Nov 26, 2005
  • #29
Very Cool, I wonder what the difference is between the K8158 and K8161. Let us know if it helps the steering.


John
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Nov 28, 2005
#30
  • Nov 28, 2005
  • #30
Opentracker said:
Very Cool, I wonder what the difference is between the K8158 and K8161. Let us know if it helps the steering.


John
Click to expand...

I may be able to do a side by side comparison because I think I may have screwed up by getting the manual idler....necessitating a trip back to OReillys to get the K8158.
Reason being, I'm going to switch out my 19:1 manual steering box for a 16:1 guick ratio box (aka Power Steering box).
So....I guess that means I'll need the PS idler arm (K8158)....I think.....maybe....oh hell, i don't know!
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Nov 28, 2005
#31
  • Nov 28, 2005
  • #31
Like Opentracker has said, this new Moog design (M2), may be about as close to a roller bearing setup as you can get.
True, it's not a real roller, but it's a HELLUVA improvement over the original design.
Check out the cutaway

 
6

66moneypit

Member
Dec 28, 2004
536
0
17
Northern Va
Nov 29, 2005
#32
  • Nov 29, 2005
  • #32
joesgt281 said:
Like Opentracker has said, this new Moog design (M2), may be about as close to a roller bearing setup as you can get.
True, it's not a real roller, but it's a HELLUVA improvement over the original design.
Check out the cutaway

Click to expand...

Joe....I gotta here how that works out for you bud...very cool cut-away pic.
 

joesgt281

Founding Member
Oct 2, 2002
163
0
0
Katy, TX
Dec 4, 2005
#33
  • Dec 4, 2005
  • #33
Opentracker said:
Very Cool, I wonder what the difference is between the K8158 and K8161. Let us know if it helps the steering.


John
Click to expand...

Okay, here's the dealio....
the Manual Steering K8161 and the Power Steering K8158 appear at first to be identical.



Turns out that the drag link end is the difference. The K8161 sleeve has a smaller i.d. than the K8158. The K8158 would have been very loose on my car.




There is another difference though....
The sleeve in the drag link end is quite a bit longer on the K8158 than the K8161.
I'm very pleased with this new M2 design and expect it to work very well.
Thanks for everybodys help.

Joe
 
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Nov 5, 2008
#34
  • Nov 5, 2008
  • #34



Well, it took me three years but I did it. A true roller idler for the 67-70 cars. It's a combo of machine work on the idler arm, idler kits from different cars (not all Ford) that needed machine work also and hardware. I made both the P/S and M/S units. They look the same so I only put up one photo, this is a M/S unit. I'm not sure what retail price is yet but they won't be cheap. Figure the cost of our regular roller idler for the early cars, plus a frame bracket, second roller kit and machine work. It is cool looking though, I've never seen one before today.
 

Attachments

  • 67to70dria.webp
    49.3 KB · Views: 124
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 6, 2008
#35
  • Nov 6, 2008
  • #35
Opentracker said:



Well, it took me three years but I did it. A true roller idler for the 67-70 cars. It's a combo of machine work on the idler arm, idler kits from different cars (not all Ford) that needed machine work also and hardware. I made both the P/S and M/S units. They look the same so I only put up one photo, this is a M/S unit. I'm not sure what retail price is yet but they won't be cheap. Figure the cost of our regular roller idler for the early cars, plus a frame bracket, second roller kit and machine work. It is cool looking though, I've never seen one before today.
Click to expand...



wow that's awesome John!!!! almost makes me want to keep the old worm/sector gear box in the 69 cougar, almost. i already have a TCP rack that i scored on ebay a couple years back for a less than $300 shipping included, however it is just the rack itself so i'll need to buy the install kit before i can actually use it in the cougar, of course. if i didn't already have the rack i would resume my search for an integral power gear box to replace the stock box and bendix power steering system. i know that ABS power brake has that power gear box kit that uses the toyota corona gear box but i'm not all that impressed with that kit, i've been wanting to try and find an early 70's f-100 power gear box and see if i can do some hacking to make it work but it's not real high on my priority list right now.

still though, i've never been one for doing things the easy way so i may go ahead and tackle that project before i full commit to the rack and order the install kit. gotta sell the stang and buy a house with a garage before i can really tackle another project of that caliber in addittion to restoing/modding the cougar too.


i've got some more ideas for that roller coilover thing i've talked to you about before as well, specifically a way to mount the upper end of the coilover without disturbing the upper spring pocket area of the shock tower. anyway, we'll get into that more once i have some money to send your way.
 

Attachments

  • 67to70dria.webp
    49.3 KB · Views: 211
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
Nov 7, 2008
#36
  • Nov 7, 2008
  • #36
I still have the photo's of that coil over with the Ford arms. I'll be glad to make you anything you want.
 
B

bnickel

Founding Member
Aug 21, 2002
5,640
3
77
lubbock, texas
Nov 7, 2008
#37
  • Nov 7, 2008
  • #37
Opentracker said:
I still have the photo's of that coil over with the Ford arms. I'll be glad to make you anything you want.
Click to expand...



yep that's pretty much exactly what i want and i've found a way to attach the top of the coilover without doing anything drastic to the shock towers too. basically the way Dolfan87 did his on the mach but slightly different. i've also found a cool LCA strut rod that basically converts the LCA to an actual A-arm from Heidts.

here is a link to the Heidts strut rod. it is intended for a mustang II LCA actualy but i think it will also work on a classic too.

Tubular Strut Rod Kit

this strut rod with one of your roller bearing conversions would be really cool and i think i've figured out a really sneaky way to attach it without cutting the strut rod supports to hell too, though they will need to cut up some, the original front mounting point will stay in place so i can attach some rubber bushings with a bolt or something and make it less noticeable, smae with the upper shock mounts too, i'll cut a shock up and bolt it to the upper mount for even more of a stealth aspect.

what do you think about doing something like that John?
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Belt routing with supercharger and smog/ac/ps delete
  • Steve6482
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
87
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 15, 2026
Steve6482
S
B
Idler pulley as substitute for Power Steering Pump ?
  • Bhenders
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
5
Views
246
Other Auto Tech Jul 16, 2026
LILCBRA
M
  • Poll Poll
Stroking a Mexico 289 or newer roller 302
  • MaryJaneTheMustang
  • Aug 12, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
99
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Aug 12, 2026
Bullitt347
D
Early ford 302 heads
  • Dagasser
  • May 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
98
The Welcome Wagon May 4, 2026
Noobz347
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
1K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?