• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Roller Rockers...

  • Thread starter Thread starter foxmustangman
  • Start date Start date Mar 17, 2008
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Mar 17, 2008
#1
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #1
So I'm looking at getting a set of roller rockers for my 'Stang. What's the difference between 1.7 and 1.6 ratio rockers, and also what's the difference between 7/16 and 3/8 stud mounts?

Thanks,
-FMM
 

mustangfan1990

New Member
Jul 17, 2005
505
1
0
Lenoir, North Carolina
Mar 17, 2008
#2
  • Mar 17, 2008
  • #2
7/16 is smaller is diameter
 

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Mar 18, 2008
#3
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #3
any benefits of it being smaller?
 

onefstsnake

New Member
Nov 25, 2005
792
1
0
Northern VA
Mar 18, 2008
#4
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #4
foxmustangman said:
any benefits of it being smaller?
Click to expand...

well one will fit and one wont.
Larger size is stronger...
 

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Mar 18, 2008
#5
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #5
so is 3/8 stock, or just a good RR. They're going to be for gt40x's.

And what about the ratio?
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Mar 18, 2008
#6
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #6
7/16 is bigger than 3/8.....

A 1.7 rocker will give you more lift and slightly more duration at the .050 lift measurement, but nothing to write home about. 1.6 is stock. I would recommend 1.7, but they don't work with some heads so I would just use a 1.6

Basically, a 1.6 rocker takes the cam profile and multiplies it by 1.6 while the 1.7 does the same thing, but you end up with a "bigger" result.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Mar 18, 2008
#7
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #7
3/8" is the smaller of the 2 available stud sizes on a stud mount rocker head, 7/16" is the larger. If you have a stock head it requires a pedestal mount rocker... You can put any ratio on ANY head, it will only depend on the spring pressure. Most cams unless noted are made/designed for a 1.6 rocker.

The 1.72 rocker will add .031" lift to the cam numbers @ .050, so a cam with an advertised .500 lift will have .531" at the rocker now.

Ped mount style head


Stud mount head
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Mar 18, 2008
#8
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #8
Fast63 and Rick are both correct, except 1.7's will NOT give you more duration. just more lift in the same duration. the camshaft determines your duration, not the rocker arms.

to determine how much lift you will gain going from a 1.6 to a 1.7, take your current lift number with 1.6's, divide by 1.6 then multiply by 1.7. example:

stock cam is .444 with factory 1.6 rockers.

.444/1.6= .277 (actual cam lift)

.277x1.7= .471 (new lift with 1.7s)

.477 if you have 1.72s

hope this helps!
 

Ramsey 93

New Member
Sep 26, 2007
15
0
0
Mar 18, 2008
#9
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #9
Not to thread jack... but if you buy most complete heads.. they come with rr's right?
 

cenok is family

15 Year Member
Jun 25, 2003
1,409
69
79
Norman, Ok
Mar 18, 2008
#10
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #10
Ramsey 93 said:
Not to thread jack... but if you buy most complete heads.. they come with rr's right?
Click to expand...

no. they come with everything EXCEPT for rocker arms. the top end kits all come with roller rockers though.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Mar 18, 2008
#11
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #11
cenok is family said:
Fast63 and Rick are both correct, except 1.7's will NOT give you more duration. just more lift in the same duration. the camshaft determines your duration, not the rocker arms.
Click to expand...

Yes, your total duration will not change and is determined by the cam only. However, your duration at .050 is a LIFT measurement, and if LIFT changes from a different ratio rocker, your duration measurement at .050 LIFT will be different.

And 1.7's DO NOT work with all heads. Try running some on windsor jrs like I did and you will have problems unless you machine the pushrod openings larger so the pushrods won't rub on the castings.
 

Rick 91GT

Mustang Master
Nov 29, 1999
9,692
95
99
PA
Mar 18, 2008
#12
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #12
Fast63 said:
Yes, your total duration will not change and is determined by the cam only. However, your duration at .050 is a LIFT measurement, and if LIFT changes from a different ratio rocker, your duration measurement at .050 LIFT will be different.

And 1.7's DO NOT work with all heads. Try running some on windsor jrs like I did and you will have problems unless you machine the pushrod openings larger so the pushrods won't rub on the castings.
Click to expand...


duration at .050" will be different, nice to see someone else know's.

How old are your Juniors?? I had a set here last month (brand new set) with 1.72" and a 5/16" pushrod no issues.
 

Ike83

Member
Sep 27, 2006
0
0
17
St. Louis, Missouri
Mar 18, 2008
#13
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #13
Just so you know......1.7s on the stock valve covers will mildly scar the tops of the rockers. Nothing too serious though.......I would still recommend them. Especially if you're upgrading your cam you'll experience a NICE increase in power.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Mar 18, 2008
#14
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #14
Rick 91GT said:
duration at .050" will be different, nice to see someone else know's.

How old are your Juniors?? I had a set here last month (brand new set) with 1.72" and a 5/16" pushrod no issues.
Click to expand...

Excellent, I find few other that know it!

My windsor jrs. are from 2003 I think, back when they came out as Roush 180's. Have they made adjustments to the casting that allow 1.7's now? I know world products had this problem with chevy heads as well, maybe they realized their blunder and fixed it?
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,597
223
Northern KY
Mar 18, 2008
#15
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #15
I'm personally against 1.7s...i don't see the need. If you want more lift, get a better cam and leave the valve geometry alone. The size of your rockers (3/8 or 7/16) will depend on what your heads are set up for, unless you buy them bare or want to run 7/16 for the added strength and buy a set of studs and swap them in the heads.
 

foxmustangman

Member
Jun 20, 2007
196
1
16
Idaho
Mar 18, 2008
#16
  • Mar 18, 2008
  • #16
so i'm going to be putting them on my stock heads and then switching them over to my GT40's whenever I get those. Does anyone see any problems with a 1.6 ratio RR, with a 3/8 stud mount? Thanks.
 

85_SS_302_Coupe

it sucks (I know) to be on the receiving end
15 Year Member
Nov 11, 2003
6,945
1,597
223
Northern KY
Mar 19, 2008
#17
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #17
I don't think it would hurt. There's lot of serious race cars out there running the stock pedestal mount setup with ported stock heads. Unless you plan on running extreme RPMs you should be ok with 3/8. I happened to find a set of Comp Cams Pro Magnums that were 7/16 for only $160 and they even came with ARP studs to match, so i'm switching the studs in my heads. I really don't know what you can do with pedestal mount, if there's even a 7/16 option, as i've never worked on them.
 

NIKwoaC

中國製造
15 Year Member
Oct 31, 2006
5,525
943
214
Chengdu Province
Mar 19, 2008
#18
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #18
Fast63 said:
Yes, your total duration will not change and is determined by the cam only. However, your duration at .050 is a LIFT measurement, and if LIFT changes from a different ratio rocker, your duration measurement at .050 LIFT will be different.

And 1.7's DO NOT work with all heads. Try running some on windsor jrs like I did and you will have problems unless you machine the pushrod openings larger so the pushrods won't rub on the castings.
Click to expand...

Now wait a second. DURATION is a measure of rotation the lobe covers on the cam base circle (degrees) and LIFT is a measure of the difference of the lobe peak and the base circle radius (inches). Maybe that is what you are trying to say, but it came of slightly confusing.

Duration measured at 0.050" is a popular method of measuring lobe duration from 0.050" lift (opening) to 0.050" lift (closing). Sometimes you can find specifications for duration on cams measured 0.010"-0.010" and smaller, though this is less popular, as the smaller numbers are harder to measure and do not significantly add any insight on lobe design over the 0.050" method (you don't flow much air with less than 0.050" lift, do you?). Notice it is still a degree measurement.

Roller rockers (or any type of rocker, really) will multiply cam lobe lift by their ratio. If you have a cam that has an intake lobe lift of 0.278" (stock HO) and 1.6 rockers (again, stock HO), then your effective valve lift is 0.278" * 1.6 = 0.4448". However, with the 1.7 rockers you will see 0.4726" valve lift.

The advantage of the 1.7 roller rockers (besides the reduction in valvetrain friction and wear) is that the desired lift can be achieved without using a cam that has more lobe lift, which results in steeper ramp rates and more aggressive grinds.

This being said, dyno reports I've seen indicate less than 10 HP gain from 1.7 RRs over the stock pieces on stock heads with stock cams. However, they may pay off in valvetrain stability, reliability, etc.

Sorry if some of this is redundant, I wanted to make sure none of us confused your original plans. I would say if you are going to buy RRs either way, go with the 1.7s.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Mar 19, 2008
#19
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #19
NikwoaC said:
Now wait a second. DURATION is a measure of rotation the lobe covers on the cam base circle (degrees) and LIFT is a measure of the difference of the lobe peak and the base circle radius (inches). Maybe that is what you are trying to say, but it came of slightly confusing.

Duration measured at 0.050" is a popular method of measuring lobe duration from 0.050" lift (opening) to 0.050" lift (closing). Sometimes you can find specifications for duration on cams measured 0.010"-0.010" and smaller, though this is less popular, as the smaller numbers are harder to measure and do not significantly add any insight on lobe design over the 0.050" method (you don't flow much air with less than 0.050" lift, do you?). Notice it is still a degree measurement.

Roller rockers (or any type of rocker, really) will multiply cam lobe lift by their ratio. If you have a cam that has an intake lobe lift of 0.278" (stock HO) and 1.6 rockers (again, stock HO), then your effective valve lift is 0.278" * 1.6 = 0.4448". However, with the 1.7 rockers you will see 0.4726" valve lift.

The advantage of the 1.7 roller rockers (besides the reduction in valvetrain friction and wear) is that the desired lift can be achieved without using a cam that has more lobe lift, which results in steeper ramp rates and more aggressive grinds.
Click to expand...

The first part of what you said is true, but I made no mention of it. I thought that was just common knowledge, and I said nothing to refute that.

However, by saying that a higher ratio rocker increases the total lift is confusing without explaining, in conjunction, that the whole lobe's ramp rate is increased. That is why no one latches on to the idea that duration measured at .050 or .010 or whatever lift you want to measure it at, is changed.
 

Foxfan88

My Grandpa has great wood.
Sep 13, 2004
2,487
4
0
Miami, Ok
Mar 19, 2008
#20
  • Mar 19, 2008
  • #20
the actual duration of the lobe will remain the same. meaning the valve will still be open for the exact same amount of time as it would be with 1.6s

but the valve has to move .030 ish (depending on cam) farther open in the same amount of time. so what results is a valve that opens and ramps up to max lift faster than it did before. so the valve is going to hit the .050 mark faster that it would before. and the valve will dwell longer in lift numbers exceeding .050"

so the duration at .050 does change

i'm no expert so if i am wrong on anything someone let me know, but that is how i see things.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Early ford 302 heads
  • Dagasser
  • May 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
1
Views
58
The Welcome Wagon May 4, 2026
Noobz347
Engine Roller Rocker Stud Size, GT40P heads
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 26, 2025
2000xp8
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
9
Forced Induction Prepping for supercharger on non-stock build
  • 91fox427
  • Nov 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
366
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 5, 2026
Qtrhrse23
Q
Engine Pushrod Length?
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
337
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 25, 2025
limp
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?