• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Roller rockers????

  • Thread starter Thread starter oldno7
  • Start date Start date Mar 28, 2010
O

oldno7

Member
Mar 27, 2010
109
1
18
Mar 28, 2010
#1
  • Mar 28, 2010
  • #1
What kind of roller rockers should i use on a stock head. Till i get the money for the tfs kit. That i could use on those too. Its a 87 5.0 gt.
 

liljoe07

5 Year Member
Feb 18, 2009
1,622
363
124
Cartersville,Ga
Mar 28, 2010
#2
  • Mar 28, 2010
  • #2
Not worth it. The TFS will be setup for stud mount rockers. And converting the stock heads to studs is a waste of money. And costly.

Just save for the TFS kit. Doesn't it come with rockers? I can't remember.
 
M

mercurycapri

Member
May 30, 2006
211
2
18
washington
Mar 29, 2010
#3
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #3
Put some proform aluminum rockers in it.
 
8

88mustang92

Member
Mar 1, 2008
105
0
16
Mar 29, 2010
#4
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #4
NOT WORTH THE HEADACHE!!! just keep your pedastal mount rockers and you will be alot happier.
 
O

oldno7

Member
Mar 27, 2010
109
1
18
Mar 29, 2010
#5
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #5
Yeah I think I will wait and just put a pin and gear i was thinking 3.73 but what all do i need.
 

SpartaPerformance

10 Year Member
Nov 5, 2006
2,517
61
89
Long Island NY
Mar 29, 2010
#6
  • Mar 29, 2010
  • #6
I agree forget the rocker arms right now. All you would need is the gear set and I would recommend one of the FRPP install packs depending on your miles. Then pick up Ford gear oil and FRPP friction modifier or some Royal Purple gear oil, no modifier needed.
 

krazedstang

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2009
670
278
104
Streamwood
Mar 30, 2010
#7
  • Mar 30, 2010
  • #7
I kinda of had the same question along the lines as this, i', looking for a set a of roller rockers to put on my stock 88, just to give me a lil extra i also have another set of stock heads that im going to get ported and a valve job done on them, any ideas? sorry not meaning to thread jack!
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Mar 30, 2010
#8
  • Mar 30, 2010
  • #8
rr's arent worth it on a mild street engine. For the money spent there are better gains to be had elsewhere.
 
O

oldno7

Member
Mar 27, 2010
109
1
18
Mar 30, 2010
#9
  • Mar 30, 2010
  • #9
so if i use royal purple gear oil no modifier is needed.

thanks
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Mar 30, 2010
#10
  • Mar 30, 2010
  • #10
Save your money and buy them later when you do a head swap. Get gears or exhaust... something not motor related instead.
Kevin
 

krazedstang

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2009
670
278
104
Streamwood
Mar 31, 2010
#11
  • Mar 31, 2010
  • #11
i have a clutch, 3.73 gear bbk shorty equal lenghts bassani xpipe and flowmaster cat back that is going into the car, i also have a explorer throttle body in it...so its not going to be totally stock by the time the roller rockers come into play
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,170
17,870
224
Massachusetts
Mar 31, 2010
#12
  • Mar 31, 2010
  • #12
krazedstang said:
i have a clutch, 3.73 gear bbk shorty equal lenghts bassani xpipe and flowmaster cat back that is going into the car, i also have a explorer throttle body in it...so its not going to be totally stock by the time the roller rockers come into play
Click to expand...


By most guys standards here...that still pretty much stock.


I still wouldn't do RR's at that point. I'd do heads, or a cam first. Are you still speed density? If so, you'll have to convert to MA anyway, so perhaps you want to do that
 

krazedstang

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2009
670
278
104
Streamwood
Mar 31, 2010
#13
  • Mar 31, 2010
  • #13
im working on getting it converted over to MAF, my friend is supposed to be pulling a computer out of his wrecked 90, and yea i consider it stock also, its just that a set of 1.7 roller rockers are much cheaper then a set of heads, maybe i will look into getting a cam instead, whats a good cam that i can use with ported and polished E7 heads?
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Mar 31, 2010
#14
  • Mar 31, 2010
  • #14
For ported E7s, stock cam is probably just at home... Something transferrable that will support your future builds is a decent cooling system or subframe connectors. I know... not entirely fufilling for the go fast bug... Might want to look into an electric fan/radiator setup. It would just suck to get pedistal roller rockers when most aftermarket heads(TFS included) use shaft mounted rockers.
Kevin
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,170
17,870
224
Massachusetts
Mar 31, 2010
#15
  • Mar 31, 2010
  • #15
To be honest, the stock cam is pretty decent. Some guys chose to advance or retard it slightly.
 

krazedstang

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2009
670
278
104
Streamwood
Apr 1, 2010
#16
  • Apr 1, 2010
  • #16
yes subframes are in the near future, i already have a strut tower brace, so pretty much what you guys are saying is if i keep the stock heads, ported and/or valve job or not i should just keep the stock cam? because if thats the case, i will probably just go with a heads, cam, intake combo instead because i don't really feel like being the slow Stang in the group lol
 

Nutzy19

Member
Mar 30, 2005
120
0
16
Flemington NJ
Apr 1, 2010
#17
  • Apr 1, 2010
  • #17
Fun stuff..
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Apr 1, 2010
#18
  • Apr 1, 2010
  • #18
Yes. Just stick with the stock cam till you redo your top end. If you swap out the cam, you will loose your low end power since everything else can't keep up with it. The biggest bottleneck on the stock motor is the intake. You can swap that out and gain some power... and it doesn't involve tearing into the motor.
Kevin
 

krazedstang

15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2009
670
278
104
Streamwood
Apr 1, 2010
#19
  • Apr 1, 2010
  • #19
maybe i will do an intake, altho im not afraid to tear into the engine, i'm just looking to do little by little this is pretty much a budget build
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
679
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
Oil choice for after break in period.
  • Sask84gt
  • Feb 28, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
26
Views
863
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 14, 2026
Praetorious
P
Engine Roller Rocker Stud Size, GT40P heads
  • foxbodyclark
  • Jan 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
14
Views
2K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 26, 2025
2000xp8
S
Holley High-ram tuning settings
  • spencergt66
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • Digital Self-tuning Forum
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
402
Digital Self-tuning Forum May 12, 2026
spencergt66
S
H
turbo advice
  • hawkinsdrag
  • May 5, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
11
Views
434
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2025
hoopty5.0
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?