• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech

rotating intake? huh?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 93pusstang
  • Start date Start date Jan 14, 2004

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#1
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #1
what exactly does this mean and how is it done? i tried the search menu but came up with nothing!
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#2
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #2
93pusstang said:
what exactly does this mean and how is it done? i tried the search menu but came up with nothing!
Click to expand...

this is on a 93 LX 2.3L n/a also
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Jan 14, 2004
#3
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #3
Check 140cilx's site.
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#4
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #4
address?
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#5
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #5
i looked at it. http://140cilx.stangnet.com/ but nothing about rotating the intake.
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Jan 14, 2004
#6
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #6

It is usually done to ease the installation of intercooler pipes for a front
mount. That way it's a straight shot into the cooler from the turbo and
then the cooler to the throttle body. It's also less area to fill.
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#7
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #7
is there a power increase in doin this or not?
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#8
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #8
and is there any need to modify the Throttle cable since ur moving the TB also?
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Jan 14, 2004
#9
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #9
Most people do it because they have a FMIC...front mounted intercooler...It makes it alot easier to pipe the air into the TB. I don't think you will get any hp increase because it is not really changing anything. There are quite a few modifications that need to be done from my understanding. It is not worth it on an N/A. Save your time and money for a turbo motor. Unless you plan to get a turbo motor with a FMIC, then it may make since to do it now to simplify things down the road.

-TG
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#10
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #10
well turbo motor is going in in the next few months.
 
M

mightypoof

Founding Member
Mar 14, 2002
523
0
0
Glendale, AZ
Jan 14, 2004
#11
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #11
are you using a big Saab or Volvo IC?
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Jan 14, 2004
#12
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #12
93pusstang said:
this is on a 93 LX 2.3L n/a also
Click to expand...

Its pretty much for the 83-88' turbo cars with the square intakes or simular earlyer turbo 2.3L. The twin plug DIS 2.3L (90-93') I don't believe you can rotate them, not a lot of people turbo charge them anyways. I think the DP intakes was done the way they are to aide in changing plugs may self, but not sure. Please correct me on this guys if I'm wrong.



***They did use the square intakes on a few other engines I think like the 89 mustangs and up to the 92 Rangers, but don't quote me on those years and
cars/trucks ****

Mikesvo's site I think, talks about how its rotated and a little on why its done. That other link has some for sale, that has some good pics as well as the one shown here

http://msvorinich.itgo.com/index.html

Http://www.40bob.com/

Hope it helps.
 

Brantley

Founding Member
Feb 29, 2000
1,329
0
0
Memphis, TN
Jan 14, 2004
#13
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #13
Since you are swapping, I would assume you'll be using the square intakes. It would be a huge pain to rotate the inline upper for the 91-93 DIS engines. Here's a pic of my rotated upper on my turbo engine. If you are using an aftermarket front mount intercooler, it may be beneficial to rotate it and then be able to shorted the intercooler pipes. However, I'm not so sure that the difference is worth the cost, especially in a stock setup. All I know is that I sure glad I didn't have to fab the intercooler pipes to come around to the throttle body in a stock position!!

 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#14
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #14
im gonna be using a 86 TC engine, volvo FMIC. if its no gain then i wont bother rotating the upper intake. also, off topic, i wouldnt mind using my dual plug head on the 86 TC swap, im assuming this would call for alot of work seein theres no distrib on 91-93 dual plug heads but are on the 86 TC motors.
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 14, 2004
#15
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #15
im full of questions tonight, also where could i get a trac lock for my stock (7.5?) rearend, limited slip ****nit sucks so bad. or will i need to upgrade to the 8.8 rearend n e ways with the swap?
 

Bearded Forever

Type O Danzigative the Dark
Founding Member
Sep 4, 2000
4,927
3
98
Vinland
Jan 14, 2004
#16
  • Jan 14, 2004
  • #16
Traction locks for the 7.5 rear end came in v6 Rangers and Aerostars.
 

Brantley

Founding Member
Feb 29, 2000
1,329
0
0
Memphis, TN
Jan 15, 2004
#17
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #17
I'd never run a DP DIS head on a turbo engine. That head flows very poorly, and does not have enough material to be able to port it enough so it does flow well. Many people on turboford are using them, but I pretty much see it as starting with a handicap from the get-go. Just my opinion.
 

i4power

Founding Member
Jan 11, 2002
1,083
0
0
Eglin AFB, Florida
Jan 15, 2004
#18
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #18
From what i've read, the dual-plug heads aren't a good idea because they are a "swirl" design, and that isn't a good thing to have on a turbo engine.
 
P

Pro-Hawk

New Member
Dec 4, 2003
971
0
0
West Texas
Jan 15, 2004
#19
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #19
93pusstang said:
im full of questions tonight, also where could i get a trac lock for my stock (7.5?) rearend, limited slip ****nit sucks so bad. or will i need to upgrade to the 8.8 rearend n e ways with the swap?
Click to expand...

I believe the 83-86'TC has this rear end. In 87-88' they went to the 8.8. I'm not sure how much different it is to swap out with the 83-86'TC's but Stingers site has a swap on a 87-88 you can check out it maybe about the same for the 83-86'TC's.

Http://projecthp.ford23.com/turboswap.html

P.s I gave up on swaping a turbo using the DP DIS set up. It can be done, but its a pain and I don't think the head is a good design for a turbo. Here is a link of a guy that has done this to his ranger and is real nice.

http://www.sdsefi.com/features/july00ranger.htm

Good Luck
 

93pusstang

New Member
Mar 15, 2003
228
0
0
Kentucky
Jan 15, 2004
#20
  • Jan 15, 2004
  • #20
thanks for the input guys, ill post up on progess in a month or so and prolly have many more questions
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Question about EGR valve, replacement, and a part on the valve.
  • DPP
  • May 9, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
75
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech May 23, 2026
DPP
D
D
After Market fuel rails with Stock fuel lines
  • dropteeth
  • May 1, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
137
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 2, 2026
2000xp8
J
Can I put rotating assembly in a new block?
  • Jeff99GTGreen
  • May 4, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
6
Views
253
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech May 6, 2025
stormsedge
C
1997 3.8l v6 timing cover mismatch *eBay guaranteed fit* haha please HELP
  • chasondragons
  • Apr 3, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
87
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Apr 3, 2026
chasondragons
C
P
2000 GT Random Power Loss
  • Pinellas50
  • Mar 9, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
240
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 23, 2026
Pinellas50
P
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2.3L (N/A & Turbo) Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?