• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

RPM II with Different Lowers?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 94GTLaserRC
  • Start date Start date Sep 12, 2005

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 12, 2005
#1
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #1
Does the RPM II upper go on the same lower as the Typhoon, RPM, and Performer?



RC
 

Grn92LX

Fidanza Man!
Founding Member
Jan 14, 2001
6,819
64
129
New York
Sep 12, 2005
#2
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #2
Nope. RPM II works only with an rpm II lower. Maybe its possible if you're really crafty with a dremel tool? My friend will be putting one on his n/a 306 soon, I can't wait to get my hands on it, its a sweet piece from what I seen
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Sep 12, 2005
#3
  • Sep 12, 2005
  • #3
The RPM II Lower is supposed to be 3/4 of an inch shorter (or taller, I forget..), and cnc machined to match the upper better. The pattern is the same, so it would probably bolt up, but you might face some clearance issues.
Let us know.....
 

sick95gt

New Member
Sep 11, 2005
104
0
0
Las Vegas
Sep 13, 2005
#4
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #4
When I bought mine, they said it had to be purchased as a kit because they are not interchangeable. Something about the bolt pattern being different. They said something about it being easier to get to the bolts.
 

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 13, 2005
#5
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #5
sick95gt said:
When I bought mine, they said it had to be purchased as a kit because they are not interchangeable. Something about the bolt pattern being different. They said something about it being easier to get to the bolts.
Click to expand...

Hey! WELCOME TO STANGNET...(and congrats on your first post )

Thanks for the replies..

It figures they would make it different.

I was considering having the Typhoon lower ported by Tmoss and getting the RPM II upper down the line.. Since I dont care about optimizing every single piece, I may just have to keep the Typhoon when I get the 331, at least for awhile....Still a year or 2 away, but doesnt hurt to research now.


Thanks
RC
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Sep 13, 2005
#6
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #6
These guys are dead on in their replies Rob. I'm pretty sure the lower has a lower overall height than the normal RPM/Performer lower.
 

VibrantRedGT

"STANGNET'S PENGUIN SMACKER"
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
14,679
424
154
Boca Raton, Florida
Sep 13, 2005
#7
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #7
I see the Edelbrock Rep all the time and dog on him about this very subject. When it comes down to it they make more money this way.
 

tmoss

Gettin Wired
Founding Member
Jun 28, 2001
7,153
32
128
Saint Louis, MO
Sep 13, 2005
#8
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #8
VibrantRedGT said:
When it comes down to it they make more money this way.
Click to expand...

That's why their in business.

I can't imagine why they would anyway. You already have the Performer (long runner) and RPMI (shorter runner) to interchange. I bet a pro-worked Performer would kick the crap out of the RPMII on a lot of combos anyway.
 

a50sn95

Founding Member
Oct 12, 2001
368
0
16
Elk Grove, CA
Sep 13, 2005
#9
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #9
Apparently, Edelbrock changed the bolt patterns due to the Chinese Copies.
The RPMII requires the 8-bolt pattern
The NEW RPM lower has both patterns, as does the TF spacer, shown below.
So, it depends on how old your lower is.....





Dennis
 

Attachments

  • tfs-51520013.webp
    5.8 KB · Views: 97
  • edl-7123_w.webp
    11.3 KB · Views: 91
  • edl-3821.webp
    5.9 KB · Views: 105

94GTLaserRC

Squint as you approach, lest you be blinded by my
15 Year Member
May 7, 2002
11,178
13
89
Ernan Says "here it comes... dushbag"
Sep 13, 2005
#10
  • Sep 13, 2005
  • #10
VibrantRedGT said:
I see the Edelbrock Rep all the time and dog on him about this very subject. When it comes down to it they make more money this way.
Click to expand...

True....I know youre going that route Joe....Im still researching on what I want, since my car "runs fine" for now...just cant beat on it until the new motor, which still may be over a year away.

(How about some Towers Friday?)

RC
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Question about my weird timing.
  • 2003 mustang gt modded
  • Apr 22, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
148
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 26, 2026
2003 mustang gt modded
351W/5.8 EFI intake manifolds fading away...
  • Ryno5150
  • Jan 13, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
523
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 7, 2026
nickyb
R
Suspension Lower control arms needed
  • racer_dave
  • Feb 9, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
3
Views
247
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Feb 20, 2026
Noobz347
T
Rpm vs rpm2
  • thor347
  • Mar 17, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
261
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 19, 2025
thor347
T
R
94’ SN95 - Intermittent lope & bogging at moderate rpm
  • Red5.0ho
  • Nov 2, 2025
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
5
Views
457
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech Nov 3, 2025
General karthief
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?