• Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech

rumor? cnl lower intake for 2v

  • Thread starter Thread starter brian98gt
  • Start date Start date Nov 24, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last

Redfire03GT

New Member
Sep 10, 2003
395
0
0
Newark, CA.
Nov 26, 2003
#41
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #41
I'd be quicker to buy a C&L lower for a cheaper price with lower gains than I would a Fox Lake/Bullitt intake. Even if it were to gain as little as 10hp or so, fine, I could probably P/P it for a few additional ponies and be completely content. Although, I hope it produces torque, too.
 
M

Moonlight97GT

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
531
0
0
Nov 26, 2003
#42
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #42
Any more info of when this thing is going to be released?
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 26, 2003
#43
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #43
The rumor is next spring
 

brian98gt

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2002
377
0
0
new jersey
Nov 26, 2003
#44
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #44
next spring sounds great if it's true. just in time to spend my tax return money instead of buying an engagement ring.lol
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 26, 2003
#45
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #45
Don't know if it is true, just what I have heard
 

Venom4.6

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
1,356
0
0
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 26, 2003
#46
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #46
In my opinion a different intake with the stock heads NA isn't worth it. The restriction is in heads. People are seeing better gains from P&P work and even aftermarket cams.
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 26, 2003
#47
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #47
But an intake is a step in the right direction.
 

Venom4.6

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
1,356
0
0
Saint Louis, MO
Nov 26, 2003
#48
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #48
[QUOTE='96&'01Stang]But an intake is a step in the right direction.[/QUOTE]
I wasn't saying upgrading the intake was a step in the wrong direction. It just seems that 10hp for over a $1000 isn't worth it. If money isn't an object I say go for it.
 

forpit2000gt

Founding Member
Jun 30, 2002
2,490
0
0
Columbia, SC
Nov 26, 2003
#49
  • Nov 26, 2003
  • #49
It's not just 7-10 hp that you will gain. You need to look at the gains accross the board. I would gladly take 10 hp and 10 ft tq accross the power band as opposed to someone building an intake with a 20 hp spike between 5800 and 6000 rpm. The gains showed so far on the Bullit and Fox Lake are worth the money. It will only get better as new products come out, but we still will have a couple of years before the power gets cheaper. I doubt we will ever see prices for the 2v mod the same as 5.0 parts .
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 27, 2003
#50
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #50
That is the whole point of all of us hoping C&L come out with there lower intake. If it is say $400 and their upper is $179, that is only $579 for a complete intake
 
T

TARZAN

New Member
Apr 25, 2003
446
0
0
Philly MS
Nov 27, 2003
#51
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #51
Well.......

If memoriy serves me correctly, didn't there used to be a plastic aftermarket intake for 2V's???? I'm just wanting something that will give me some NA power, b/c I'm looking for everything I can get out of an all motor car..........at a reasonable price!!!!

Does anyone remember the aftermarket plastic intakes??

Also, what did ya'll think about the new article about the 2V Reichardt :sp: Intake???

-Will
 

TeriiK

New Member
Jun 20, 2003
186
0
0
Nov 27, 2003
#52
  • Nov 27, 2003
  • #52
Venom4.6 said:
In my opinion a different intake with the stock heads NA isn't worth it. The restriction is in heads. People are seeing better gains from P&P work and even aftermarket cams.
Click to expand...


the restriction is not in the heads. when you look at the numbers, such as port size, valve size, and a CFM map of our heads, they flow quite well. the biggest reason is quite simply our intake manifolds. while this gives us large amounts of torque, they choke the motor up on the top end. i wish Ford had put the extra effort to design a variable length intake manifold for the 4.6, much like Fords other modular motors (2.5 modular duratec). the benifits would be enormous, a little more torque, and a ton of HP.

Oh, and i hope everyone here realizes that it does cost money to go fast, but that does not supercede the fact that Fox Lake is taking advantage of the modular community. they know the market is non-existant, so rather than provide a reasonable intake price, one that Fox lake would profit greatly and we would be more willing to buy one, Fox lake has decide to stick everyone for all they can get...1300 bucks worth. Greed at its finest.
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 28, 2003
#53
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #53
TeriiK said:
Oh, and i hope everyone here realizes that it does cost money to go fast, but that does not supercede the fact that Fox Lake is taking advantage of the modular community. they know the market is non-existant, so rather than provide a reasonable intake price, one that Fox lake would profit greatly and we would be more willing to buy one, Fox lake has decide to stick everyone for all they can get...1300 bucks worth. Greed at its finest.
Click to expand...


I think that is why everyone is complaining about the $1300 price tag on the fox lake intake. It would just make more sense to lower the price and sell more intakes than to sell it at that outrageous price and sell only a few intakes
 

brian98gt

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2002
377
0
0
new jersey
Nov 28, 2003
#54
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #54
i agree, if it was between 8 and 9 hundred for the fox lake with the rails, i would definately consider it
 
C

COLFLAG

New Member
Nov 21, 2003
16
0
0
SE PA
Nov 28, 2003
#55
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #55
I know nothing at all about the C&L rumor of a new manifold but I do know for certain that a very performance oriented Ford dealership on the east coast ( ok central Jersey, ok still not enough Toms River NJ oh alright Downs Ford) is about to bring out their own manifold for the 2v 4.6 engine. I have no details on when or pricing or configuration I just know that is is about to happen .
 
G

GinoGT

Founding Member
Aug 11, 2002
1,862
0
36
Nov 28, 2003
#56
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #56
COLFLAG said:
I know nothing at all about the C&L rumor of a new manifold but I do know for certain that a very performance oriented Ford dealership on the east coast ( ok central Jersey, ok still not enough Toms River NJ oh alright Downs Ford) is about to bring out their own manifold for the 2v 4.6 engine. I have no details on when or pricing or configuration I just know that is is about to happen .
Click to expand...

No way! Toms River is like an hour from me. If that's true..........

Gotta keep tabs on that one.
 

brian98gt

Founding Member
Mar 12, 2002
377
0
0
new jersey
Nov 28, 2003
#57
  • Nov 28, 2003
  • #57
COLFLAG said:
I know nothing at all about the C&L rumor of a new manifold but I do know for certain that a very performance oriented Ford dealership on the east coast ( ok central Jersey, ok still not enough Toms River NJ oh alright Downs Ford) is about to bring out their own manifold for the 2v 4.6 engine. I have no details on when or pricing or configuration I just know that is is about to happen .
Click to expand...


will this be an upper and lower, and how do u know this info. downs ford is an hour from me also
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 29, 2003
#58
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #58
How did you find out about this intake from Downs Ford
 
C

COLFLAG

New Member
Nov 21, 2003
16
0
0
SE PA
Nov 29, 2003
#59
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #59
I used to work at the Navy Base in Lakehurst and wore out several credit cards buying parts for for the 5.0's that I owned from the Motorsport Parts Department at Downs. I still touch base there once in a while with Joe Amato the Motorsports Parts Manager and he mentioned it in an email last week . As I said I have no details yet on price, configuraation or when it will be available just the promise from Joe is good enough for me tho.
 

'96&'01Stang

New Member
Feb 10, 2003
798
0
0
Georgia
Nov 29, 2003
#60
  • Nov 29, 2003
  • #60
Sounds good, hopefully it won't be priced like the bullit intake
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Next
First Prev 3 of 4 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
340
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
1
Engine Motor swap from a 2003 Explorer
  • 1996mustang new
  • Oct 9, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
587
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 16, 2025
squeak93
Drivetrain Rear end clunk
  • seanmahoney
  • Oct 13, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
408
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 13, 2025
nickyb
D
Rockers, lash adjusters and timing: help with parts (4.6 2v)
  • dvigAtel
  • Nov 1, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
0
Views
236
Other Auto Tech Nov 1, 2025
dvigAtel
D
S
Timing chain, guides and tensioner installation (Possible orientation in Intake Stroke)
  • StallionMax
  • Sep 21, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
383
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Sep 24, 2025
StallionMax
S
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?