• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Running no PCV system?

  • Thread starter Thread starter stephen4785
  • Start date Start date Jan 27, 2004

stephen4785

New Member
Dec 14, 2003
321
0
0
Fort Worth Texas
Jan 27, 2004
#1
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #1
Will not running a PCV system hurt performance at all?If so then how bad will it hurt it?
 
S

sleeper89

New Member
Nov 18, 2002
388
0
0
Toronto, Ontario
Jan 27, 2004
#2
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #2
it shouldn't be a problem as long as you run a crankcase breather on the oil fill tube.

-steve
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Jan 27, 2004
#3
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #3
What I want to know is why? The PCV evaucates all of the blowby out of the crank. Keeping the oil cleaner and high pressure air out of the way of fast moving pistons. Think about moving a piston through thicker, pressurized air as opposed to a slight vacuum.

Remember the feather falling at the same rate as the bowling ball in a vacuum tube.
 

YardSpecial

New Member
Mar 20, 2003
2,664
0
0
MT
Jan 27, 2004
#4
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #4
What he said, WHY???

Helps more then hurt.
 

IndyBlk5.0

New Member
Nov 24, 2003
1,122
1
0
New Whiteland, IN
Jan 27, 2004
#5
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #5
ttt i want more information, tell me why it helps to not run a pcv, i know pcv's suck oil into the intake runners... ive been looking at ways to get rid of this...
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Jan 27, 2004
#6
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #6
IndyBlk5.0 said:
ttt i want more information, tell me why it helps to not run a pcv, i know pcv's suck oil into the intake runners... ive been looking at ways to get rid of this...
Click to expand...

Not to get off track, use a vacuum pump if you want to get rid of the PCV system. With baffeling installed, you should not get much oil into the runners. After 100k miles, it may build up. You should have no more than an oil mist in the intake if everything is good.
 
G

goldbomb79

Member
Jun 4, 2003
374
0
16
Indiana
Jan 27, 2004
#7
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #7
if you replace the woven material under the pcv every so many miles it will help prevent some of the oil being sucked into the intake. also, this is why ford recommends changing the pcv valve every 10,000 miles
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,169
17,866
224
Massachusetts
Jan 27, 2004
#8
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #8
What about on a Carbed setup?

Should i runa PCV setup or just run dual breathers??
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 27, 2004
#9
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #9
yep. a catch can will work. some use a fuel filter, but it requires maintenance. a catch can sounds like what you need. i plan on doin one at some point for fun. you can plumb the can to return the oil, but id rather dump it every now and again.
 

gearheadboy

15 Year Member
Jan 15, 2003
1,425
177
84
Greencastle Pa
Jan 27, 2004
#10
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #10
Some people (especially those with total seal rings or file fit type rings) use two breathers with tubing routed down to the header collector and into the exhaust. Remember if you go this route you need the one way valve at the collector so as not to get exhaust flow into the breather.
I personally would run a pcv system, a small vacuum induced into the crankcase also helps with unwanted seal/gasket failures.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jan 27, 2004
#11
  • Jan 27, 2004
  • #11
and remember, the pcv system is bi-directional. something to think about when modding the system, if that is decided upon.
 

hllon4whls

BANNED
Founding Member
Jan 17, 2002
2,567
0
46
Covington
Jan 28, 2004
#12
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #12
gearheadboy said:
Some people (especially those with total seal rings or file fit type rings) use two breathers with tubing routed down to the header collector and into the exhaust. Remember if you go this route you need the one way valve at the collector so as not to get exhaust flow into the breather.
I personally would run a pcv system, a small vacuum induced into the crankcase also helps with unwanted seal/gasket failures.
Click to expand...

That only works if you have a short freeflowing exhaust with unbaffled mufflers. Or open headers. Works from the venturi principle.
 

ONEFAST91GT

Founding Member
Sep 10, 2002
492
0
0
Central Jersey
Jan 28, 2004
#13
  • Jan 28, 2004
  • #13
No PCV for me...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Looking for this part
  • limp
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
267
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 27, 2025
limp
Engine on3 Conversion to draw through MAF?
  • sav22rem22
  • Oct 11, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
249
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2025
sav22rem22
W
2.3 l pcv canister
  • waxman
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
119
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 16, 2025
Noobz347
D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
212
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
G
  • Poll Poll
I got a free Mustang from Grandma
  • GrannysMustang
  • Mar 4, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
14
Views
338
The Welcome Wagon Mar 6, 2026
Realmongo
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?