• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

S-rod

  • Thread starter Thread starter MustangGlx
  • Start date Start date Jul 7, 2004

MustangGlx

New Member
Apr 2, 2003
147
0
0
Connecticut
Jul 7, 2004
#1
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #1
ive herd that the s-rod 4 speed( i have one in my 82 gt) is pretty much "crap", can anyone tell me if its true, and if it is what abot it makes it crap? thanks
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 7, 2004
#2
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #2
Not familiar with the term S-rod. I assume it may stand for short rod, which might indicate the debored 255ci 4.2L V8 offered in the GT in '82. On the other hand, the 5.0L 302 offered in '82 didn't even make 160 HP, so neither of these engines are exactly spectacular. On the 302, chalk it up to very restrictive heads, 2bbl carb and an environmentalist butt kissing cam. The 4.2L isn't even worth discussing. Reading your post again, it sounds like you may be talking about the tranny though? If that's the case, all I know about it is that it only had to be strong enough to handle 160HP, and Ford didn't overbuild anything- especially in the '80's.
 

wythors

Get off my lawn!!!
Founding Member
May 17, 2000
2,277
35
69
C Addle
Jul 7, 2004
#3
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #3
SROD = single rail overdrive transmission. These early Fox manual transmissions cannot handle much more than the torque offered by those early 80's V-8s, which is very little. If you are making any kind of power, you'll find out really quick why they are considered "crap".
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,813
234
Dublin GA
Jul 7, 2004
#4
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #4
On the flip side, if you put a Tremec 3550 or variant thereof in the car, you won't have to buy a new bellhousing - it's a bolt up.

But if you put in a T5, you'll need a different bellhousing.
 

stangbear427

Active Member
Nov 11, 2002
2,401
1
49
New England
Jul 7, 2004
#5
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #5
I should have known that... at least my tranny based buess was close...
 
9

93-2.3

Member
May 22, 2003
99
0
6
PA
Jul 7, 2004
#6
  • Jul 7, 2004
  • #6
i took the 4 speed out of my 83 it was an rug model probably the same thing for all i know and i put a t-5 in it was the best thing i ever did
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
Drivetrain 91 AOD linkage at transmission
  • alchemist1
  • Sep 29, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
352
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Sep 29, 2025
JD1964
S
01 GT DRIVERS SIDE DOOR LOCK CYLINDER LINKAGE
  • Scwhitten
  • May 13, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
197
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jun 19, 2026
melo.timo
M
Suspension Maximum Motorsports Tapered Bumpsteer Kit MMTR-2 - Replacement Spherical Rod Ends
  • AeroCoupe
  • Mar 30, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
208
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 30, 2025
AeroCoupe
B
Engine Strange Noise
  • burntokita
  • May 8, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
424
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 11, 2026
keel
A
79 mustang pace car spoiler.
  • Anglosaxon83
  • Feb 21, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
144
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Feb 21, 2026
Anglosaxon83
A
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?