• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Sadly another L/T thread.

  • Thread starter Thread starter StangLou
  • Start date Start date Aug 10, 2004

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Aug 10, 2004
#1
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #1
Ok, a full exhaust is going to be my first major mod in getting my 5.0 on its way to track duty. As its stands now the car is an auto. It will be converted to a 5 speed when funds permit, but i want to go on and do L/T's and a midpipe now. I was told most any L/Ts that will fit an auto will be able to carry over to a 5 speed. What L/Ts are out there for autos??? The only ones I really saw were Mac and Kooks I was thinking a set of MAC L/T's with a Prochamber and I already have Flowmaster 40s. Anyone have any other suggestions or ideas??? Also, does anyone have sound clips of the above combo by chance? If so you can pm me or post them if you would like. I checked mustangexhaust.com and didnt see that particular combo listed. Thanks guys
 

79'293stang

Active Member
Jan 5, 2003
505
11
29
Cedar Rapids, Iowa
Aug 10, 2004
#2
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #2
i have flowtech long tubes and i like them, havent had any problems at all with them and ive had them almost 2 years.
 

stockhatch

Founding Member
Oct 9, 2001
536
0
16
polar sloth country
Aug 10, 2004
#3
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #3
I hated my Pro-Chamber. Just me, but it was way too quiet. Plus it was tough to get it up against the floorpan and it seemed to hang too low. Again, Just my .02...

AC
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Aug 10, 2004
#4
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #4
www.mustangexhaust.com
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Aug 10, 2004
#5
  • Aug 10, 2004
  • #5
www.mustangexhaust.com
Click to expand...

Yeah, at the end of my first post I said I checked that sight. They have nothing with Mac L/T's, Prochamber, and flowmaster 40's combo. Anyone have the Mac L/T's? How was fitment and quality???
 

MadMatt5oh

Member
Jan 10, 2003
441
0
16
St Paul, MN
Aug 11, 2004
#6
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #6
They look great and fit great. The install was a nightmare as any long tube install would be. I have have an extremely noticeable increase in power and sound. Theres nothing like longs
 
8

85/96gt

New Member
Mar 27, 2004
131
0
0
Aug 11, 2004
#7
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #7
you wont' find that sound clip.. you can't get a prochamber for longtubes can you?.. im pretty sure you cannot.
 

Ourobos

Member
Apr 12, 2004
260
1
17
Aug 11, 2004
#8
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #8
My headers were sorta difficuly.. Jacked the motor up, and both went on from up top. Had to remove the starter and master cylinder, which lead to me getting a new master cylinder, but that's another story. I use a Dr. Gas Xpipe and Flowmaster 40s dumped, and the sound is straight mean..
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Aug 11, 2004
#9
  • Aug 11, 2004
  • #9
I noticed a huge difference when the L/T's went on my '03. I went with BBK, but my '03 is a 5 speed so I had a lot more options with that. I was told that the shop has done several guys with Mac L/T's and Prochambers Oddly enough BBK sent me the wrong mid when my L/T's went on. We spent 2 hours trying to find a midpipe to fit for me to drive the thing home and to work the next day. The shop had a spare Prochamber laying around, so we decided to try it since nothing else worked. Low and behold the thing fit perfectly to the BBK L/T's Bolted it on and drove it home and to work the next day . The thing sounded up to 3000rpms, anything after that sounded horrid . Im hoping it would sound that way with the Mac's and Prochamber.

MadMatt, what kind of midpipe are you running???
 
B

blk92stangg

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
583
0
0
Hawaii
Aug 12, 2004
#10
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #10
I was thinking, depending on how you go about getting parts for the t5 conversion, it could actually cost less than a L/T and h-pipe combo (unlikely but possible) Ever thought of going that route and saving for the L/T's instead?
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Aug 12, 2004
#11
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #11
I have thought about it, but it would be a good bit cheaper to do this instead. My main goal for the car is to have 550+ at the wheels. I want to put a TKO in it, Spec Stage III, flywheel (undecided which one at the moment), not to mention the cose for install, pedal assembly, bell housing, shifter, ect...
Just the TKO itself will run me about $1300. The total tranny swap price Im looking at is a bit over $2100 best I can figure at the moment. I can definately have the L/T's and midpipe installed for well under that amount of money.
It wasnt going to be an issue money wise, but I just had to drop over $1000 on a new ac coil for my house, dont get me started
 
B

blk92stangg

New Member
Jan 30, 2004
583
0
0
Hawaii
Aug 12, 2004
#12
  • Aug 12, 2004
  • #12
Ah, I hear ya. Any chance of you doing your own work? To save some moolah?
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Aug 13, 2004
#13
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #13
I am some what mechanically inclined, but I am in no way a mechanic. Simple swaps I can do. Ive done Pulleys, and a CAI on it already. I might attempt the L/T install myself on the 5.0. Ive heard they are a good deal easier than the 4.6's. As for the engine/tranny swap, those are two pretty important pieces to get right Ill probably let the pros handle that task.
 

MadMatt5oh

Member
Jan 10, 2003
441
0
16
St Paul, MN
Aug 13, 2004
#14
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #14
Stanglou, I have a Mac off road H
 
N

Nottoofast50

Founding Member
Dec 9, 2000
386
0
0
Cali
Aug 13, 2004
#15
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #15
Had to jackup the motor to put in my Mac LT's as well. I have an auto. Mac sent the wrong headers first(5spd) so had to send back and get the right ones. They payed for shipping thou. I don't have prochamber but i have mac lt's and mac offroad hpipe and flows. I can get you a soundclip later if you want. I have a cam though so it sounds a little diff than it did when i had stock cam.
 

StangLou

Active Member
Jul 9, 2003
1,264
0
36
Holly Springs, NC
Aug 13, 2004
#16
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #16
Yeah sure Ill take a clip of the setup, it will at least give me an idea what to expect. I was kinda let down how quiet my 4.6 is with L/T's and hi flow cats, but oh well I dont attract unwanted attention.
 

MadMatt5oh

Member
Jan 10, 2003
441
0
16
St Paul, MN
Aug 13, 2004
#17
  • Aug 13, 2004
  • #17
Ive never heard a prochamber but I would think it was much louder. If you have an engine flowing better than stock it would be crazy loud.

The thing about that cooky prochamber is that I think youd get just a few (at best) more hp- but at the expense of 5-10 tq
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
684
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
New Member with a 1992
  • Clutchfork
  • Oct 18, 2025
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
5
Views
261
The Welcome Wagon Oct 19, 2025
Clutchfork
Progress Thread Floor pan repair/build thread
  • sav22rem22
  • Jun 6, 2021
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
127
Views
20K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 4, 2023
sav22rem22
B
Daily driver debate: 65-68 coupe or 62-63 Comet
  • BoulevardofRustedDreams
  • Oct 18, 2019
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2020
wicked93gs
Taurus Fan And Fal 33054 Install On A Fox
  • No.11
  • Oct 4, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
8
Views
5K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Oct 11, 2016
MFE92
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?