• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

sbf valve guides

  • Thread starter Thread starter 67rcks
  • Start date Start date May 4, 2008
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
May 4, 2008
#1
  • May 4, 2008
  • #1
I am wondering about worn valve guides. My haynes manual says side-to-side will needs to be less than 0.020" for valve lifted about 1/8" (i.e. 0.010" to one side), otherwise overhaul is recommended e.g. instalation of bronze inserts. However, when can I expect just too much of oil leaks? E.g. is 0.030-0.040" will way too much?

And what about valves, how much wear (at stems) is generally fine - also the manual does not specify it

I also received some rubber gaskets in felpro engine gasket set to install over the valve guides. Are these going to help sealing at all? please help
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 4, 2008
#2
  • May 4, 2008
  • #2
Machineshops used to knurl the guides when slightly worn. I'm sure some still offer this. The knurling doesn't last as long as new guides, but was a cheaper alternative, especially if you're just building a weekend warrior and not a daily driver. My 1964-70 Motor Repair Manual gives valve guide clearances of .001" for the intakes and .002 to .0027 for the exhaust. It doesn't specify whether that's open or closed. more likely it's closed I'd think. Small block stem diameter is listed as .3416 to .3423 (intake) & .3406-.3413 (exhaust) I'm assuming the gaskets you're talking about are the umbrella seals, these work to a certain extent, better than nothing but less than PC type seals. The umbrellas get old and brittle at some point and find their way into the crankcase and oil pump eventually.
 
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
May 5, 2008
#3
  • May 5, 2008
  • #3
D.Hearne said:
Small block stem diameter is listed as .3416 to .3423 (intake) & .3406-.3413 (exhaust).
Click to expand...

Thanks D.H. for the advice. Just wondering, are these stem diameters a factory tolerance or you mean e.g. when diameter is ,3416 valve replacement is recommended? Eg fed mogul lists stem diameter of a new valves 0,3415 (ex V1961) and 0,3420 (intake V1932) and I guess V1932 cannot wear to .3423.

On my engine ('73 302), I measured valves and they are missing 0,002" at stems, do you think I should replace them too when installing new guides? A guy who made overhaul just knurled the guides but some of them are too loose (more than 0.020") and I don't want to risk oil leaks.

Also wondering are bronze guides 2.25" long enough for old cast iron heads for which auto parts stores lists 2.5" long cast iron guides? I am thinking about using late model stock guides which are however .25" shorter.
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 5, 2008
#4
  • May 5, 2008
  • #4
The motor book just list those specs, I'd assume that anthing smaller in diameter needs to be replaced. As for those bronze guides, new guides are usually longer than needed so they'll fit a wider variety of applications. Once they're installed the machinist can trim the tops. As for loose guides and oil consumption, that's the least that can happen. I'd be more worried about dropping a valve head with the sloppy guides.
 
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
May 6, 2008
#5
  • May 6, 2008
  • #5
D.Hearne said:
As for loose guides and oil consumption, that's the least that can happen. I'd be more worried about dropping a valve head with the sloppy guides.
Click to expand...

You mean if guides are worn valves would not seat OK?

If decided to replace valves are these interchangeable with ones in EFI engines (to use regular gas without any lead substitute)? They are slightly different - .040" shorter and head angle is 45.5 vs 46 degrees. Does this make any difference that some other parts may be affected eg. springs, pushrods, etc?
 
D

D.Hearne

New Member
Sep 29, 2000
11,730
6
0
south louisiana
May 6, 2008
#6
  • May 6, 2008
  • #6
I don't know what heads you have but aside from the stem lengths, all the SBF 1.78/1.45 valves are interchageable as to fuel types. The Pre April 66 heads had shorter valve stems than the post april 66 heads. Then the next change was I think made in late 77 when the switch to pedestal rockers was made. Then the E6SE heads had even shorter valve stems than the E7TE's.
 
6

67rcks

Member
Feb 20, 2008
373
0
17
May 15, 2008
#7
  • May 15, 2008
  • #7
thanks man
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
684
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
2001 Mustang GT -- Valve Assembly Pressure Regulator Solution Found!
  • SN95_fanx54
  • Aug 17, 2024
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
3K
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Oct 23, 2025
Noobz347
A
95 Gt intermittent backfire
  • A_A_Ron
  • May 26, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
396
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 26, 2025
A_A_Ron
A
K
TKX Transmission Shifting Problem
  • KWC156
  • Jun 23, 2025
  • Other Auto Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
2K
Other Auto Tech Saturday at 3:39 PM
427nostang
4
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?