• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Shock mount mod for '65-'66 cars with Koni's

  • Thread starter Thread starter Opentracker
  • Start date Start date Aug 16, 2004
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
O

Opentracker

20+ Year Stangneter
Feb 4, 2004
516
0
16
May 15, 2005
#21
  • May 15, 2005
  • #21
1965pony said:
What ever you lower the car by would determine the height of the space required. The spacer or extended shock mount provides additional shock travel lost during the lowering process.
Very nice alternative to the spacers, Very stock looking. Now to make coil over mounts that look stock! Vince
Click to expand...



I have been working on a coil over type set up that uses Ford parts. These photos are of a mock up arm and parts. This mod transfers load from the upper arm to the lower arm using stock type upper and lower arms, spring and shock. The lower arm I will use, has a screw in ball joint that is made to use under tension and a spherical bearing inside pivot. I may put this kit on my next track car project. This arm has also had the ball joint area realigned and the dome cut back for a wheel with more backspacing. The back of the dome is cut to clear the spring perch when it's moved 1 1/2" forward to get a better motion ratio. You can see the second set of holes in the arm. I will for sure have to use the shock mounts I made or spacers if I do this to a early Mustang.


Photo 1

Photo 2

Photo 3

Then the arm gets a brace .


John
 
1

1965pony

New Member
Apr 17, 2005
37
0
0
Nor Cal
May 16, 2005
#22
  • May 16, 2005
  • #22
CO arms

Looks good John, very nice job...tracked it yet? Vince
 

Pathfinder65

New Member
Mar 31, 2005
142
1
0
Ottawa, Canada
May 17, 2005
#23
  • May 17, 2005
  • #23
Opentracker said:
I started using the same spacing as the Vintage racers at Laguna Seca years ago. I asked questions and they said the shock may bottom out with a lowered car. The mount can't be too tall or it will hit the hood. I didn't do anything other than put the shock in the car and bring the suspension up to full joust (with no spring in place) and see how much more room the shock had to go.

John
Click to expand...
Thanks John
Dave
 
G

grego37

New Member
May 12, 2004
576
0
0
Fresno CA
May 17, 2005
#24
  • May 17, 2005
  • #24
Hey guys, great topic and posts.

Should I be considering doing something like that, (or spacers) on 67/68 mustang
with Konis that has been lowered. Would I have the same problem or is this just a 65/66 issue?
I've lowered the upper arms and I've shortened my 620's for a low ride height.

should I measure my Konis at full compression, and measure at full extension, and measure when it's at ride height or something to see if the ride height measurement is near center of travel??
 

latamud

Founding Member
Oct 22, 2002
791
2
19
Tampa, FL
May 27, 2005
#25
  • May 27, 2005
  • #25
grego37 said:
Hey guys, great topic and posts.

Should I be considering doing something like that, (or spacers) on 67/68 mustang
with Konis that has been lowered. Would I have the same problem or is this just a 65/66 issue?
I've lowered the upper arms and I've shortened my 620's for a low ride height.

should I measure my Konis at full compression, and measure at full extension, and measure when it's at ride height or something to see if the ride height measurement is near center of travel??
Click to expand...

This isn't just a Koni only mod. If you lower your car, then your shock gets compressed that much more. Not sure if it'll bottom out but the chances are greater. The spacers work the same as the mod, just doesn't look as nice. It isn't just a 65/66 issue. These car are lowered 2-3 inches, sometimes more. Thats a significant change. I'm no expert, but I'd imagine a good point for the shock to rest at is at a mid-point, not a compressed point. If you do bottom out the shock, it would probably bend the rod and blow the shock out.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

L
95 gt engine vibration
  • lenzgt
  • May 11, 2026
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Replies
6
Views
221
1994 - 1995 Specific Tech May 26, 2026
lenzgt
L
J
For Sale MASTER LISTING: Abandoned '66 Mustang Restomod Part-Out (Wilwood, Ididit, Quick Performance, Mishimoto)
  • JasonB66
  • Jul 23, 2026
  • Suspension
Replies
0
Views
69
Suspension Jul 23, 2026
JasonB66
J
Tuners come on inside
  • squeak93
  • Feb 13, 2026
  • SVT Tech Forum
Replies
1
Views
259
SVT Tech Forum Feb 20, 2026
squeak93
B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Jul 14, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
8
Views
205
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 18, 2026
AeroCoupe
J
2004 Mustang 3.8L V6 vibrations above 65 MPH and differential leaks
  • joeybuddy96
  • Mar 16, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
16
Views
597
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 14, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?