shock tower surgery...

project.65

New Member

Sep 18, 2007

45

0

0

Dec 4, 2007

#1

• Dec 4, 2007

• #1

I have a '65 and as all of you know, getting a 351w in that engine bay is a tight squeeze. I was wondering how hard is it to notch the shock towers. I tried to look for (pics.) on steps on how to do it, but didnt have any luck. I do have a lincoln mig welder wich i will be starting to start practicing how to use. I also have grinder, and all those fun power tools I think I will need.

 

D

D.Hearne

New Member

Sep 29, 2000

11,730

6

0

south louisiana

Dec 5, 2007

#2

• Dec 5, 2007

• #2

It's not hard to do, but you'll need new steel to replace the old. You'll also need to bend the new to fit. I did the towers in my 77 Comet recently, cut em back 2". They curve back shallower at the top to allow room for the firewall brace bolts. I cut the bottom about an inch above the upper "A" arm bolts.

 

dennis112

15 Year Member

May 15, 2005

1,561

36

79

Amish Wonderland of Central PA.

Dec 5, 2007

#3

• Dec 5, 2007

• #3

Check this out:

http://www.fordmuscle.com/archives/2001/06/project460/

 

project.65

New Member

Sep 18, 2007

45

0

0

Dec 5, 2007

#4

• Dec 5, 2007

• #4

thanks dennis just what I needed 2 see.

 

project.65

New Member

Sep 18, 2007

45

0

0

Dec 5, 2007

#5

• Dec 5, 2007

• #5

I was wondering, would it be a bad idea to cut at an angle towards the wheels to gain a 3" clearance, instead of cutting straight down like the article said?

 

dennis112

15 Year Member

May 15, 2005

1,561

36

79

Amish Wonderland of Central PA.

Dec 6, 2007

#6

• Dec 6, 2007

• #6

project.65 said:

I was wondering, would it be a bad idea to cut at an angle towards the wheels to gain a 3" clearance, instead of cutting straight down like the article said?

Click to expand...

Too much of a cut might mean that you would be against the coil spring. You need to allow some room for it if you want to continue to use the original suspension.

Chances are, you won't need that much clearance anyhow unless you plan go to a motor wider than the 351w. Although I would like to have a little more side clearance with my 393, I really don't have any problems pulling plugs or doing other work, such as adjusting the valves.

 

D

danny clemens

Member

May 4, 2005

728

0

16

Dec 6, 2007

#7

• Dec 6, 2007

• #7

project.65 said:

I was wondering, would it be a bad idea to cut at an angle towards the wheels to gain a 3" clearance, instead of cutting straight down like the article said?

Click to expand...

I would make the first cut straight down and then put a template on it to check and see if it were possible to cut more off. If you then felt like you needed to cut more off you would then know where you could safely stop. I'm thinking like dennis112 that the 2" would be plenty of room.

 

project.65

New Member

Sep 18, 2007

45

0

0

Dec 6, 2007

#8

• Dec 6, 2007

• #8

I guess you guys are right, 2" would be pleanty of room for a 351w.

 

K

kbelusa

New Member

Apr 15, 2006

19

0

0

Toronto, Canada

Dec 19, 2007

#9

• Dec 19, 2007

• #9

Just a thought, but wouldn't cutting it on an angle create a stronger tower?
If you are using coil overs, more space becomes available, with strutts even more. RSS makes a shock tower notching kit, but they will not sell it unless you buy there struts. They have install photos if you are interested.

 

N

Nosboss

New Member

Dec 17, 2007

115

0

0

Dec 19, 2007

#10

• Dec 19, 2007

• #10

Would this make enough room for a big block in the 65-66 cars?

 

ratio411

Founding Member

Apr 21, 2002

3,870

73

109

Pensacola FL

Dec 20, 2007

#11

• Dec 20, 2007

• #11

Nosboss said:

Would this make enough room for a big block in the 65-66 cars?

Click to expand...

Shaving is good for 351c or 351w.
I have seen FEs shoehorned in with only shaved towers and Hooker swap headers (Hooker recently discontinued making them).
However, it is VERY tight and the end product looks like the tower shave needs shaving!

 

Loup-garou

Founding Member

Aug 11, 2001

337

0

16

New Orleans, LA

Dec 26, 2007

#12

• Dec 26, 2007

• #12

I know a guy who has '67 shock towers in his '65. It's more work, but the end result is very clean. I've been thinking of doing that same mod to my own '65... I want more space under the hood but I'm not sold on the MII conversion.

 

ratio411

Founding Member

Apr 21, 2002

3,870

73

109

Pensacola FL

Dec 26, 2007

#13

• Dec 26, 2007

• #13

Loup-garou said:

I know a guy who has '67 shock towers in his '65. It's more work, but the end result is very clean. I've been thinking of doing that same mod to my own '65... I want more space under the hood but I'm not sold on the MII conversion.

Click to expand...

I was under the impression that the frame rails (entire front subframe) had to be used from the donor car to get the towers further apart.

I have seen a 70 Stang front subframe used to get a 460 in a Maverick.
The towers are not different enough to truely make any room.
It's the frame rails that set the tower clearance, position, and the track width.

I brought up the Maverick conversion because the engine bay, track width, and rail width are almost identical dimensions to a 65-66 Stang.

Of course the 70 subframe in the narrower car meant that a little more backspace was needed on the front rims. Just as if you put a 67-70 rear in a 65-66.

 

M

maddon

New Member

Sep 20, 2010

2

0

0

state of jeferson

Feb 28, 2011

#14

• Feb 28, 2011

• #14

I would like to see how these towers turned out
I cut my shock towers this weekend and would like to cut more
393w w/hooker supercomp 1 3/4 headers