• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-

Fox Shopping For Heads

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glocker23
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2016

Glocker23

Member
Oct 21, 2015
35
4
18
Connecticut
Dec 3, 2016
#1
  • Dec 3, 2016
  • #1
So as stated above I am shopping for heads. I have a 302 with bolt on mods and cam. Was thinking I want a good set of heads. Was looking afr but didn't know what size is good 165 or 185. Was also checking out twisted wedge or maybe edelbrock. Not sure what would work with my setup or what could be recommended.

My car is a street car. Won't hit track. Trying to take care of it having 61000 original miles on the 1992. But looking for more power. One day would like to either do 331 or 347 stroker or supercharger...or both ... and would like to use same heads as ones I am looking for.

What would you guys do?



Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
K

knuckledragger77

Member
Apr 6, 2015
3
2
13
Dec 3, 2016
#2
  • Dec 3, 2016
  • #2
If you're going to add a blower get the larger combustion chamber. It will seem a little anemic before you put the power adder on but you will want the extra space when you do. Can't go wrong with afr buddy. Good luck.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Dec 3, 2016
#3
  • Dec 3, 2016
  • #3
what cam are you running? that determines what springs and heads. I run afr 165 heads and with a V3 making around 450rwhp, and made around 300rwhp N/A through an AOD. You can get away with 185's depending on what cam profile you run but will need to check PTV. Also, you will need to measure for pushrod length depending on what cam you run.. For chamber size, the smaller the chamber the higher the compression which you'll have to adjust for in your tune when you add a supercharger. Lastly, what ratio rocker do you run now and what do you want to run as that will also have an impact on PTV clearance- stock is 1.6 pedestal mount.
 

Glocker23

Member
Oct 21, 2015
35
4
18
Connecticut
Dec 4, 2016
#4
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #4
mikestang63 said:
what cam are you running? that determines what springs and heads. I run afr 165 heads and with a V3 making around 450rwhp, and made around 300rwhp N/A through an AOD. You can get away with 185's depending on what cam profile you run but will need to check PTV. Also, you will need to measure for pushrod length depending on what cam you run.. For chamber size, the smaller the chamber the higher the compression which you'll have to adjust for in your tune when you add a supercharger. Lastly, what ratio rocker do you run now and what do you want to run as that will also have an impact on PTV clearance- stock is 1.6 pedestal mount.
Click to expand...
Ooof. I only know cam is a f303. The rest I dont know. Could be stock or have been upgraded. Last owner didn't remember the details of internals if they were done.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,856
10,533
203
polk county florida
Dec 4, 2016
#5
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #5
61k and what? And the owner doesn't remember, post some pics, can't talk about huff'n and puff'n but plan for the future, some guys (any girls here? They are allowed, right?) hang'n here have some good advice, well except the guy with the ls engine,
Point is plan for future artificial air pressure now. That includes the brakes and suspension. All that go and no woh makes insurance companies cringe.
Oh, you can get good advice here if your car is reasonably cool , so post some pics, if your car ain't cool (like mine) find one on line.
 

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 4, 2016
#6
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #6
Tfs 11r's get my vote if seriously planning more cubic inches,etc in future. If you're going to add a blower...just about any aluminum head will work. As far as the AFR 165 ve 185's goes...most people have PTV issues with the 185's 2.02 intake valves. The 11 r's design actually increases PTV clearance but you always have to check. They also have superior hardware.
 
Reactions: RangerJoe

Glocker23

Member
Oct 21, 2015
35
4
18
Connecticut
Dec 4, 2016
#7
  • Dec 4, 2016
  • #7
I read that about the 185s which is another reason was aiming to the 165. Just want to make sure I go the right way as I will be n/a for now and would like to supercharge maybe down the line. Will look at those TFs though.

As far as what karthief was saying car is already lowered with good suspension. I have full subframe connectors to be put on in the spring. Brakes could def be upgraded though lol.

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: A5literMan

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 5, 2016
#8
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #8
Trick Flow 170 get my vote. great runner size for NA HP and will flow plenty enough for the blower.
 

Noobz347

Stangnet Facilities Maint Tech... Er... Janitor
Admin Dude
Jan 4, 1985
42,933
21,110
234
Box behind Walmart
Dec 5, 2016
#9
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #9
Glocker23 said:
What would you guys do?
Click to expand...

Opinion Poll


Moved to over Talk Secion
 

General karthief

wonder how much it would cost to ship you a pair
5 Year Member
Aug 25, 2016
27,856
10,533
203
polk county florida
Dec 5, 2016
#10
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #10
My opinion?
More beer. And I don't even drink beer!
 
Reactions: Glocker23

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 5, 2016
#11
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #11
A 165-170cc runner is fine for a street car/mild blower on a 302. The AFR and TFS heads are the best Bolt on head. But they are limited. At least the tfs head has room to grow and bigger valves to start with. If adding a blower it doesn't really matter...you'll be capable of splitting the block before running out of "head". If op just wants 300 or so n/a or 450 with the blower...I vote TFS 170's...if going stroker and/or more power potential...11 r's.
 
Reactions: knuckledragger77

Jersey Joe

I remember blowing that Monkey's ass
10 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
760
1,280
154
Bloomingdale N.j.
Dec 5, 2016
#12
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #12
I went with TFS 170''s but it was the whole top end kit. I don't have a flow bench and I don't scream down a quarter mile so I can't give you performance comparisons. what I can tell you is they look great, they assembled with no problems and my ass dyno says they work pretty good.

 
Reactions: elarm1, Davedacarpainter, knuckledragger77 and 3 others

Glocker23

Member
Oct 21, 2015
35
4
18
Connecticut
Dec 5, 2016
#13
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #13
A5literMan said:
A 165-170cc runner is fine for a street car/mild blower on a 302. The AFR and TFS heads are the best Bolt on head. But they are limited. At least the tfs head has room to grow and bigger valves to start with. If adding a blower it doesn't really matter...you'll be capable of splitting the block before running out of "head". If op just wants 300 or so n/a or 450 with the blower...I vote TFS 170's...if going stroker and/or more power potential...11 r's.
Click to expand...
Would the 11rs be good with a blower one day too. I am torn for future after the heads to do a blower or go 331 stroker. Do the 11rs have any bolt on issues like afr 185s?

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: knuckledragger77

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 5, 2016
#14
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #14
Glocker23 said:
Would the 11rs be good with a blower one day too. I am torn for future after the heads to do a blower or go 331 stroker. Do the 11rs have any bolt on issues like afr 185s?

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
These were mine. No bolton issues. You may want a custom cam. I had the 205's with a custom cam designed for stock shortblock. There are a few guys on corral.net running the 195's on stock shortblocks with mostly custom cams but some have used catalog grinds. Most are making 20-50hp more than the typical tfs kit. Now these are more deticated builds to n/a power but streetable. It's not the cheapest route or absolutely necessary for what your ultimate goals are or will be. If going stroker-n/a build you will need more breathing ability out of the head. That's why I recommend these.

If blower...not so much because you are forcing more air into the engine. The 11r's are a one stop shopping IMO. Capable of supporting a sedate stock shortblock build(overkill but they work) up to about 1000hp in a big inch blower motor. They were running around 2k the last time I looked.

If you're going to make a 300rwhp semi daily driver...go with the 170cc head. If adding a blower and wanting around 450rwhp...either head is a good choice. If wanting a n/a motor in the 350+rwhp or plan on a aftermarket block build...go 11r's
 
Reactions: mikestang63 and knuckledragger77

A5literMan

At least it is lumpy...
5 Year Member
Jul 30, 2011
4,674
2,343
194
Illinois
Dec 5, 2016
#15
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #15
You will have to check PTV clearance with any cam! And real issues with cam's with more than around 220* dur @.050-.515 lift unless timing events are correct you'll have contact. My custom was 223/227-.525. Guy I sold it to reported he made 338rwhp@5800rpms and 335rwtq@5000rpms but I never saw a real dyno sheet from him. And he used the 195 11 r's.
 

Gearbanger 101

Straight Outta Locash
20+ Year Stangneter
Aug 10, 2002
9,457
1,377
234
Ontario, Canada
Dec 5, 2016
#16
  • Dec 5, 2016
  • #16
knuckledragger77 said:
If you're going to add a blower get the larger combustion chamber. It will seem a little anemic before you put the power adder on but you will want the extra space when you do.
Click to expand...
I wouldn't limit myself with a large combustion chamber unless I was either A) too cheap to run premium fuel all of the time, or B) running a LOT of boost. I'm pushing 14psi through a 10:1 compression ratio, on pump gas, just fine.
 
Reactions: knuckledragger77

Glocker23

Member
Oct 21, 2015
35
4
18
Connecticut
Dec 6, 2016
#17
  • Dec 6, 2016
  • #17
No charger as of yet. I do run a f303 cam. And do run 93 all the time

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
K

knuckledragger77

Member
Apr 6, 2015
3
2
13
Dec 6, 2016
#18
  • Dec 6, 2016
  • #18
Good advice all around, looks like someone had some tough decisions to make.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: Glocker23

Glocker23

Member
Oct 21, 2015
35
4
18
Connecticut
Dec 6, 2016
#19
  • Dec 6, 2016
  • #19
knuckledragger77 said:
Good advice all around, looks like someone had some tough decisions to make.

Sent from my SM-G928V using Tapatalk
Click to expand...
Really excited at the info received on this post. Will continue to research of course but def a great track. Prior to this post I was afr only focused. Now TFs are on the table for sure

Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
 
Reactions: A5literMan and knuckledragger77

a91what

SendMeUrDataLog
10 Year Member
Apr 6, 2011
10,739
6,720
214
Hillsborough county
Dec 6, 2016
#20
  • Dec 6, 2016
  • #20
I agree the low compression for boost theory is defunct.
When running boost on a high compression build 10:1-11:1 just keep the timing in check and run premium.
I could write a few pages on tuning a setup like the one I just described, but the big thing to remember is start with MBT timing and pull 1* per psi and use it as a starting point.
 
Reactions: A5literMan, mikestang63, 90sickfox and 1 other person
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

C
347 advice
  • CRonaldo773
  • Jan 27, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
5
Views
258
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 28, 2026
2000xp8
R
New heads
  • Robman8028
  • Jul 30, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
666
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 31, 2025
gkomo
Fox Xtremely high fuel consumption
  • PonyGTrider
  • Apr 11, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 9 10 11
Replies
213
Views
3K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 9, 2026
PonyGTrider
C
Dyno day! # guesses?
  • clayton seiders
  • Aug 15, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
368
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 16, 2025
Scrapla347
C
C4 trans help needed
  • CPH89LX
  • Apr 26, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
138
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Apr 28, 2026
CPH89LX
C
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?