• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Single chamber flowmasters

  • Thread starter Thread starter mustangman70
  • Start date Start date Aug 16, 2006
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2

XXBULLETSXX

New Member
Mar 30, 2005
301
0
0
Kannapolis, NC
Aug 17, 2006
#21
  • Aug 17, 2006
  • #21
I too wanted something considerably louder then what I had which was two chamber 40's. After building my motor there was a considerable amount of back pressure, so much so that my new motor would barely run. So I went straight down to the muffler shop (without enough money for new mufflers) and I had them yank out the 2 1/4 pipe meeting my headers and remove the 2" pipe after the mufflers. Then I had them install 2 1/2" from the headers back to the mufflers (same 2 chamber 40's) and then I had him install some 3" dumps turned so they point where my rear tires meet the ground.
I got just what I was looking for, much much louder and added a much deeper tone that just thunders. It gets a LOT of attention when I roll it into car shows and cruise-in's. No one can believe it's just a built 289. They all laugh like I'm joking with them as if I don't want to tell them what the engine really is.

Long story shorter, 2 chambers can be really loud depending on how free flowing you make your pipes and larger diameter pipes make a deeper tone. Give it some thought and see what you can do to make your pipes as straight as possible for a louder sound.
 

Cupid

Member
Mar 30, 2006
162
0
16
Aug 18, 2006
#22
  • Aug 18, 2006
  • #22
mustangman70 said:
Maybe ill just save the money and buy the electronic adapters so i can open them with a switch
Click to expand...

Gentlemen.... I've actually seen(and heard) this before. It was definitely a life changing experience for me... Why? Can't remember the year of the fastback 65ish, but it had a huge Paxton Supercharger(Polished, of course...) under the hood. Man, that car was a thing of beauty. The guy actually did my exhaust for me, but I definitely didn't have the money for the electronic cut out!

One day when I go cruising, I'll get a picture of his car and post it. Hopefully he'll let me get a pic of the powerplant.
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Aug 19, 2006
#23
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #23
Pictures as promised. The sound clip on Mpeg sounds like hell so I'm not so sure you want to hear it.

Ignore the nasty dirty X-pipe, I had a tad too much trans fluid in to be launching off the brake, need to clean it up soon....

View attachment 447358

View attachment 447360

View attachment 447362

View attachment 447364

View attachment 447366
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Aug 19, 2006
#24
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #24
View attachment 447356

This doesn't do the car justice, this is the first time I have posted a sound clip... It could be a tractor running instead of my car....
 

Cannoball888

New Member
Dec 25, 2005
320
0
0
Gainesville, FL
Aug 19, 2006
#25
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #25
washMO66, what kind of subframe connectors are those?
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Aug 19, 2006
#26
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #26
Well.....i got ****ing had......by the way i think it sounds awosme looks great too man!!

But i just found out something....the flows that were on the car....were 3 chamber 50 series

This may explain why i didnt like the sound and got cut outs

The case on them are 17 inches.....the 2 chambers are 13 inches....****er

I only paid 50 bucks for both but i guess thats what happend when your 16....**** lol
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Aug 19, 2006
#27
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #27
Cannoball888 said:
washMO66, what kind of subframe connectors are those?
Click to expand...

TCP
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 19, 2006
#28
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #28
mustangman70 said:
i have to fix the rust and build the motor first lol
Click to expand...

That's why the two chamber Flows aren't that loud. I had them on my stock '89GT and they weren't bad. After putting in a cammed aluminum head engine(engine in my sig), they were a LOT louder. Too loud, in fact. I have 24" Thrush glasspacks on my '68 and they are done in the Shelby style, ie, dumped in front of the back tires. My head was pounding after driving 60 miles to work. I came home with earplugs in and getting on the throttle it still felt uncomfortably loud. I'm probably going to get an x-pipe with some Dynomaxes and run the exhaust out the back.

But hey, if you're already deaf, what is there to lose, right?
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Aug 19, 2006
#29
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #29
My two cahmber flows were loud droning and I just plain didn't like them.... These Borlas' have the right sound with zero drone.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Aug 19, 2006
#30
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #30
Hey shelby bro read my post two above yours...

It turns out i never had the 2 chamber 40's on the car...so i dont even know what 40's would sound like...

The casing on the mufflers i have measure 17 inches...2 chambers should measure 13 but these measure 17 which are the 50 series (3 chamber)

I think im gonna go the borla route though....it sounds sick
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Aug 19, 2006
#31
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #31
Mustangman, don't buy mufflers until you get uor motor done. Engine build has as much to do with sound as muffler design.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Aug 19, 2006
#32
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #32
washMO66 said:
Pictures as promised. The sound clip on Mpeg sounds like hell so I'm not so sure you want to hear it.

Ignore the nasty dirty X-pipe, I had a tad too much trans fluid in to be launching off the brake, need to clean it up soon....

View attachment 447314

View attachment 447316

View attachment 447318

View attachment 447320

View attachment 447322
Click to expand...

do those headers scrape?
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Aug 19, 2006
#33
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #33
No scraping, loads of ground clearance. At least loads in comparison to my Saleen Extreme that I just sold....

They are plenty high off the ground.
 

bad68coupe

New Member
Jul 18, 2006
220
0
0
Richardson, TX
Aug 19, 2006
#34
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #34
washMO66 said:
No scraping, loads of ground clearance. At least loads in comparison to my Saleen Extreme that I just sold....

They are plenty high off the ground.
Click to expand...

was the car lowered and what kind of headers are they again?
 

washMO66

Founding Member
Oct 30, 2001
1,000
0
37
Washington, MO
Aug 19, 2006
#35
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #35
Reverse eye 5 leafs on the rear, 620lb 1 inch drop springs on the front with 1/3 coil cut off....

Hooker Super Comps.
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 19, 2006
#36
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #36
mustangman70 said:
Hey shelby bro read my post two above yours...

It turns out i never had the 2 chamber 40's on the car...so i dont even know what 40's would sound like...
Click to expand...

Alright. I think I missed the fact that this thread was already two pages, got to the end of page 1, and just hit reply.
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Aug 19, 2006
#37
  • Aug 19, 2006
  • #37
lol no biggie man

So is the XX pipe better for power? how different will it sound compared to a H pipe are jsut straight duals liek i had?
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Aug 20, 2006
#38
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #38
mustangman70 said:
lol no biggie man

So is the XX pipe better for power? how different will it sound compared to a H pipe are jsut straight duals liek i had?
Click to expand...


it equalizes the pressure between both pipes creating a more even exhaust tone and more outlets to escape
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Aug 20, 2006
#39
  • Aug 20, 2006
  • #39
mustangman70 said:
So is the XX pipe better for power? how different will it sound compared to a H pipe are jsut straight duals liek i had?
Click to expand...

Yeah, just a little bit. They do the same job than an H-pipe does, but an X kills some of the low-frequency drone/rumble/etc. Unlike an H shape, the X forces both sides to equalize a little better. On a sub-400hp n/a street car there won't be enough difference to feel, but the sound is different. True duals, IMO, suck. They have a nostalgic sound, but I don't care for it. My '68 has true duals, BTW. It sounds like an odd-fire 4-cylinder on either side of the car.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • 2
First Prev 2 of 2
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Differential noise over bumps
  • sharkrat
  • Apr 10, 2026
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
222
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Jun 18, 2026
TPony
O
Good all around perfornace-ish tires?
  • optionizerSS
  • Jan 25, 2026
  • 2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
391
2005 - 2014 S-197 Mustang -General/Talk- Jun 15, 2026
TPony
A
Resolved Electrical Help Please
  • Alabama
  • Jan 22, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
313
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 22, 2026
AeroCoupe
Can makes noises when driving poping
  • Creomod
  • Oct 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
17
Views
635
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 19, 2025
Creomod
H
Ongoing Battle With Hydraulic Lifters
  • hailer06
  • Jun 8, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
7
Views
379
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jun 9, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?