• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Smog Delete Guys: What belt size are you running

  • Thread starter Thread starter red94fiveo
  • Start date Start date Feb 16, 2004

What size belt are you running with your smog bypassed?

  • 895k6

    Votes: 5 55.6%
  • 900k6

    Votes: 2 22.2%
  • 905k6

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • other

    Votes: 2 22.2%

  • Total voters
    9

red94fiveo

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
1,269
0
0
Wichita, KS
Feb 16, 2004
#1
  • Feb 16, 2004
  • #1
OK, like the subject says, what size belt is everyone running with thier smog pumps bypassed? I've done a search on this and found about 3 different sizes hat people are using. I was just trying to get an idea of what is the most popular. If I go to autozone and buy all 3 will they let me return the 2 I don't need.

Just to make sure I understand the belts numbering on lets say 895k6, the 895 stand for an 89.5 inch long belt, and the 6 means it a six rib. Should I just tell the guy at the parts store I need an xx.x inch 6 rib serpentine belt, or give him the PN#? I;m kinda belt dumb, so sorry if this seems obvious.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Feb 17, 2004
#2
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #2
Yes, 895k6 stands for 89.5" long and 6 rib. I'm running the 905k6 on my car but now the belt has stretched a little and I can hear my tensioner hitting every now and then. There was no way the 895k6 was going to fit on my car. I think the 900k6 would be your best bet for this one but discount autoparts doesnt carry that size and I wasnt going to drive 30minutes to an autozone to pick up one. If you have any doubts if the belt will fit or not, take some tools and change it in their parking lot with them out there with you. If it fits perfectly, go back in and pay for it, if it's too big get a smaller one.
 

GTJake

Founding Member
Oct 28, 2002
3,049
0
56
Ann Arbor, MI
Feb 17, 2004
#3
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #3
90" with March Underdrives. Just try a bunch until you find the one that's just right...that's what I did.

Jake
 

5.0 from 95

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2001
738
0
0
Emory, TX
Feb 17, 2004
#4
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #4
I have the 895k6 on mine. The guy at NAPA said it actually measured a little shorter than 89 1/2"s. And yes, tell the number they know like 895k6.


Paul
 
F

fastf50rd

New Member
Jan 17, 2003
720
1
0
mass.
Feb 17, 2004
#5
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #5
yeah, i have a 895k6. I just took string and measured it. It did come out a little under 89.5.
 

1105

I AM the random post master...bow down
May 3, 2003
3,841
0
0
Daytona Bch, FL
Feb 17, 2004
#6
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #6
Do you two that run the 895 have UD pullies on your car? There was NO way that I could even pry that size onto my car, and even the 905 seemed like it was a little tight at first.
 

5.0 from 95

Founding Member
Nov 6, 2001
738
0
0
Emory, TX
Feb 17, 2004
#7
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #7
Yep, all 3, FRPP U/D pullies. 895k6 was actually just a hair loose, but still had tension on it good.


Paul
 
9

94DreamGT

Founding Member
Jul 19, 2000
593
0
16
Indiana
Feb 17, 2004
#8
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #8
89.5" was WAAAYYYY too lose on mine. It actually threw it off and kept shredding it.

Could not find a 89" anywhere...so I put on a 88.7" and although it was really tight getting it on (re: PITA), it fits snug now and works perfectly.
 

red94fiveo

New Member
Apr 12, 2003
1,269
0
0
Wichita, KS
Feb 17, 2004
#9
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #9
Well I just talked to someone from my local autozone on the phone, and I can just buy a couple sizes and return whichever ones I don't use. I think I'll start with the 895, 900, and 905 and go from there.
 

Eric94GTvert

Founding Member
May 13, 2002
596
1
16
PA, Nazareth
Feb 17, 2004
#10
  • Feb 17, 2004
  • #10
1105 said:
Do you two that run the 895 have UD pullies on your car? There was NO way that I could even pry that size onto my car, and even the 905 seemed like it was a little tight at first.
Click to expand...

Something doesn't seem right here.
We have used 895k6 most of the time and sometime even a little bit smaller. (can't remember the smaller size)

We did (5) 94-95 gt's like this and all had underdrive pullies and all worked perfectly with this setup.
I can't imagine Ford production tolerances are this bad.

Maybe the belt routing isn't correct. Is this how you're routing it?
94-95 Belt routing
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Progress Thread finishing touches on my stroker build
  • doobismaximus
  • Jul 2, 2020
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
4K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 1, 2021
nickyb
Engine Paxton Supercharger Serpentine Belt Issues Please Help!
  • drw4338
  • Dec 30, 2016
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
3K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jan 1, 2017
drw4338
Timing Cover/harmonic Balancer Removal And Replacement
  • jrichker
  • May 28, 2017
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
16K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 6, 2024
Noobz347
Rehashing The Re-hash
  • CarMichael Angelo
  • Jul 28, 2016
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 5 6 7
Replies
128
Views
10K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Aug 1, 2016
billison
Novi 2000 Belt Issues
  • bdep73
  • Aug 15, 2012
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
5K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Dec 24, 2012
bdep73
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?