• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

sn-95 5 lug conversion...which struts?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 1991vert
  • Start date Start date Jun 1, 2007

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jun 1, 2007
#1
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • #1
i want to buy some lakewood 70/30's but don't know if i should get the stock foxbody length or the sn-95 length?
 
R

RioRed4v

New Member
Aug 1, 2003
24
0
0
Las Vegas
Jun 1, 2007
#2
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • #2
fox length
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jun 1, 2007
#3
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • #3
are you 110% sure?
 
R

RioRed4v

New Member
Aug 1, 2003
24
0
0
Las Vegas
Jun 1, 2007
#4
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • #4
i have a sn95 front conversion and am using fox struts, so i'd say so.

hell, you can use fox struts/shocks on a sn95 if its nice and low and it would be a better option than using the sn95 shocks/struts (because of the car being so low)

unless there is some special reason (like the car being really high or maybe need a alot of travel) why you need to use a sn95 70/30 over a fox 70/30, i see no reason why you cant use a fox spec one.
 

1991vert

10 Year Member
Feb 27, 2004
1,103
7
69
Ludlow, MA
Jun 1, 2007
#5
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • #5
RioRed4v said:
i have a sn95 front conversion and am using fox struts, so i'd say so.

hell, you can use fox struts/shocks on a sn95 if its nice and low and it would be a better option than using the sn95 shocks/struts (because of the car being so low)

unless there is some special reason (like the car being really high or maybe need a alot of travel) why you need to use a sn95 70/30 over a fox 70/30, i see no reason why you cant use a fox spec one.
Click to expand...

just wanted to make sure
 

jammer84_03

New Member
Nov 30, 2003
468
1
0
Jun 1, 2007
#6
  • Jun 1, 2007
  • #6
the bumpstops are the only differences between the two. internal vs. external
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,355
207
114
Ohio
Jun 2, 2007
#7
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #7
The SN95s will bottom out before the Fox ones.
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
32
69
East Hartford, CT
Jun 2, 2007
#8
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #8
Shakerhood said:
The SN95s will bottom out before the Fox ones.
Click to expand...


i disagree

i have 03 cobra bilsteins on my 89 w/ SN95 brakes, and i have never bottomed out, even with the C springs.

i think we can add this one to the 5.0 myths, right alongside the quad shock myth.
 

jrichker

StangNet's favorite TOOL
In Remembrance. Thank you for your contributions
Mar 10, 2000
27,512
2,811
234
Dublin GA
Jun 2, 2007
#9
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #9
Kumm3 said:
i disagree

i have 03 cobra bilsteins on my 89 w/ SN95 brakes, and i have never bottomed out, even with the C springs.

i think we can add this one to the 5.0 myths, right alongside the quad shock myth.
Click to expand...

The quad shocks are a roll of the dice. No matter what the combination of control arms and shocks, some cars will wheel hop without quad shocks and some won't. There are so many variables in 28-13 year old cars with wear, misalignment and combinations of suspension componets and tires that one unchanging answer won't work for everyone.

I personally would leave them in place, and make sure they are in good shape. I do know this, that Ford is cheap. If they could have made changes in some simple component like bushings or control arm construction and saved $10, they would have done it. Multiply $10 times all the Fox body Mustangs ever made and you would be almost as rich as Donald Trump. That's a lot of $$$, and good incentive to engineer something to do away with the quad shocks.
 

Mustang5L5

That is…until I whipped out my Bissell
Mod Dude
Feb 18, 2001
43,170
17,870
224
Massachusetts
Jun 2, 2007
#10
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #10
jrichker said:
I personally would leave them in place, and make sure they are in good shape. I do know this, that Ford is cheap. If they could have made changes in some simple component like bushings or control arm construction and saved $10, they would have done it. Multiply $10 times all the Fox body Mustangs ever made and you would be almost as rich as Donald Trump. That's a lot of $$$, and good incentive to engineer something to do away with the quad shocks.
Click to expand...



Bingo.

With all the engineering ford put into the Fox suspension since 1986, they would have eliminated the quad shocks if they could have. They tweaked spring rates, dampener rates, stabilizer thicknesses and adjusted the bushings a little and they still kept the quads.

They are there for a reason, and it's not to band-aid poor engineering.

Every car is hit-or-miss on if you can remove them. I love it when someone chimes in "I took my quads off and have no problem" and yet they don't even have the same setup as others. Even tires can play into if you have hop or not. Everyone is different, so the cookie cutter "ditch the quads with LCA's" statement is obsolete these days
 

stang&2Birds

Founding Member
May 4, 2000
2,091
5
58
New England. :-) CT/MA
Jun 2, 2007
#11
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #11
Kumm3 said:
i disagree

i have 03 cobra bilsteins on my 89 w/ SN95 brakes, and i have never bottomed out, even with the C springs.
Click to expand...
So, because you have never had a problem, that makes it Dogma? Hmm, because you have never been hit by lightning, then people do not die from lightning strikes? Right? Yes, your perspective on the world defines the world!

If you go to UConn, I still have contacts from when I went to grad school and taught there. I'll make sure I talk to your professors.


Maybe you should check the specs on Fox vs sn95 struts. Do you know any of the differences?

Don't use sn95 struts on lowered cars, they will bottom out before the suspension does. It would be very very bad if your strut breaks!

SN95 FCA's are ~1.3" longer. The sn95 struts are made to be ~1+" longer (they also revise the FCA mounting point). Some strut manufactures list the specs.
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,355
207
114
Ohio
Jun 2, 2007
#12
  • Jun 2, 2007
  • #12
Kumm3 said:
i disagree

i have 03 cobra bilsteins on my 89 w/ SN95 brakes, and i have never bottomed out, even with the C springs.

i think we can add this one to the 5.0 myths, right alongside the quad shock myth.
Click to expand...


I have Bullitt Struts and Shocks on my Car and held side by side to my Fox Ones the Bullitts bottomed so they have Less Travel, and BTW Quad Shocks are not a Myth!
 

Kumm3

Founding Member
Jul 30, 2002
527
32
69
East Hartford, CT
Jun 4, 2007
#13
  • Jun 4, 2007
  • #13
stang&2Birds said:
So, because you have never had a problem, that makes it Dogma? Hmm, because you have never been hit by lightning, then people do not die from lightning strikes? Right? Yes, your perspective on the world defines the world!

If you go to UConn, I still have contacts from when I went to grad school and taught there. I'll make sure I talk to your professors.


Maybe you should check the specs on Fox vs sn95 struts. Do you know any of the differences?

Don't use sn95 struts on lowered cars, they will bottom out before the suspension does. It would be very very bad if your strut breaks!

SN95 FCA's are ~1.3" longer. The sn95 struts are made to be ~1+" longer (they also revise the FCA mounting point). Some strut manufactures list the specs.
Click to expand...

um, ok then.....

was just stating my actual real world experiences with this setup. My apologies if you disagree, but thats your right to do.

Never went to Uconn, and really dont know what that has to do with anything, this is tech, not talk.
 

SVT32VDOHC

waiting for the next hack atta
Founding Member
Nov 22, 2001
3,501
28
119
Motor City
Jun 4, 2007
#14
  • Jun 4, 2007
  • #14
Mustang5L5 said:
Bingo.


Even tires can play into if you have hop or not. Everyone is different, so the cookie cutter "ditch the quads with LCA's" statement is obsolete these days
Click to expand...

Yes siiir!! I have uppers and lowers....with no quads...never had quads. They are heavy duty with poly bushings, and I still have wheel hop, although it was greatly reduced. I do have bad tires though, they are blad and a little chopped. That could contribute to the wheel hop also. I have the brackets for the quads, and I still have to buy quads but I am going to put them on soon even if the tires solve the wheel hop.
 

bullitstang1313

Member
Jan 21, 2003
713
0
16
Indianapolis / Columbus, Indiana
Jun 4, 2007
#15
  • Jun 4, 2007
  • #15
To get back to the question asked by 1991vert, use the Fox struts. I have the fox 70/30's on mine with the sn95 spindles and haven't had any problems. I did a coil over setup with tubular a-arms though. I asked the guys with maximum motorsports and they said to stay with the Fox struts.
 
S

Sicarius428

Active Member
Jan 6, 2004
2,085
5
49
Jun 4, 2007
#16
  • Jun 4, 2007
  • #16
A lot of SN-95 guys buy Fox struts when they lower their car. Stick with the Fox struts.
Kevin
 

Shakerhood

20+ Year Stangneter
Oct 28, 2004
3,355
207
114
Ohio
Jun 4, 2007
#17
  • Jun 4, 2007
  • #17
Sicarius428 said:
A lot of SN-95 guys buy Fox struts when they lower their car. Stick with the Fox struts.
Kevin
Click to expand...

The reason SN95 Cars use Fox Struts when lowered is there will be less chance of bottoming out the Struts.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

8
87 lx 4cyl to v8 project 4 lug disc conversion questions
  • 87lx428
  • Mar 24, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
467
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Mar 25, 2026
87lx428
8
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
865
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
Rear Disc and Rims Offsets
  • TripleYellow
  • Nov 11, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
19
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 9, 2026
TripleYellow
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
247
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
F
5 lug disc brake pad help
  • Foxrider714
  • Nov 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
219
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 17, 2025
KRUISR
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?