So Funny!!!

O

one_bad_5.0

New Member

Feb 9, 2007

0

0

2

New York

Nov 25, 2007

#1

• Nov 25, 2007

• #1

I was bored but it worked out well for me.

http://youtube.com/watch?v=szkFB5pycq0

http://youtube.com/watch?v=I1pUmxpJMCo&feature=related

http://youtube.com/watch?v=mXFy3zZ4XjY

I know that Shelby teamed up with Crysler in the 80's and made some cars but I didn't know one of them was a turbo van. What the hell?!?! Soccer moms must of been wrapping thoses things around poles left and right to get to the grocery store before Tommy's game.

 

D

DeVus1

Founding Member

Mar 29, 2002

400

2

28

P-Town, Va.

Nov 25, 2007

#2

• Nov 25, 2007

• #2

Alrighty then.

 

408gt91

Member

Apr 29, 2007

114

0

16

N.H.

Nov 25, 2007

#3

• Nov 25, 2007

• #3

My first car was a shelby charger with a 2.2 turbo.LOL

 

P

PJB

New Member

Aug 22, 2006

131

0

0

Rotterdam, NY

Nov 25, 2007

#4

• Nov 25, 2007

• #4

www.thedodgegarage.com

 

P

PJB

New Member

Aug 22, 2006

131

0

0

Rotterdam, NY

Nov 25, 2007

#5

• Nov 25, 2007

• #5

408gt91 said:

My first car was a shelby charger with a 2.2 turbo.LOL

Click to expand...

I actually was looking for one of those and bought one on ebay before I bought my Mustang but the seller said I didnt have to buy it because he found alot more unibody rust than he thought it had.

 

justabigkid

New Member

Jul 1, 2007

20

0

1

chicago

Nov 25, 2007

#6

• Nov 25, 2007

• #6

Yeah if you look around on you tube you can find a couple of those turbo mini vans running low 12's with the wood grain on the sides. They were just 2.2 engines but you can put alot of boost through them.
I am a parts guy for a dodge dealer and I remember back in the day when the performance catalog was all 2.2 stuff. The GLH cars were really cool because they weighed nothing and if you want to talk about forgotten bang for the buck muscle cars look no further than a early nineties dodge dakota with the 5.2 and manual trans, they cost less and were as quick as a stock 5.0.