• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

so I just watched gone in 60 seconds

  • Thread starter Thread starter DarkoStoj
  • Start date Start date Dec 25, 2005
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Dec 25, 2005
#1
  • Dec 25, 2005
  • #1
and damn, i forgot how nice that mustang sounded.

Didn't they have a big block one, and a couple small block ones or something?

That one part of the movie where he broke the pass side mirror off......how do I make mine sound like that?

oh, and I know how much you all LOVE eleanore.......
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Dec 26, 2005
#2
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #2
Which one are you talking about? The real one, or the Nicholas Cage one?

Most of the audio effects in films are "engineered" any more. That car could have had an I-6 and they just dub a knarly V8 sound in post production.
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Dec 26, 2005
#3
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #3
well thats gay
 
M

mustangman70

Founding Member
Dec 30, 2001
1,235
1
0
St pete, Florida
Dec 26, 2005
#4
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #4
im pretty sure it had a 350 in it
 

HistoricMustang

Active Member
Apr 11, 2003
2,359
0
46
Confederate States of America
Dec 26, 2005
#5
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #5
DarkoStoj said:
well thats gay
Click to expand...

We do not need the C-C stuff over here.

And, the original was a MUCH better flick.

HistoricMustang
www.historicmustang.com
 
D

danny clemens

Member
May 4, 2005
728
0
16
Dec 26, 2005
#6
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #6
I agree with Historic. I have both and think the original is the best. During the summer of 2004 I took a trip out to the Northwest. There was a museum along the way with a good collection of cars. I'm not sure but I think it was in South Dakota. They had a Gone In 60 Seconds Mustang. The man in charge (curator?) said that it was the actual car that Nicholas Cage drove in the high speed chase scene down the drainage ditch. If he was being truthful or not I don't know. Anyway if it was it had a 351 Windsor in it and an NOS bottle in the trunk. I've got pictures but I don't know how to post. I'm very computer illiterate. They also had a General Lee that he said was one of the early cars used in the Dukes Of Hazard. It had a 318 column shift in it.
 

Max Power

Active Member
Jul 31, 2003
1,774
1
36
St Paul
Dec 26, 2005
#7
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #7
No more engineered than those jigglies in your avatar, Darkostoj.
 

68keyblr

20+ Year Stangneter
Mar 17, 2003
946
20
49
Arizona
Dec 26, 2005
#8
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #8
My 2 - 1/2 inch exhaust with Flowmaster 40's (original, not Delta) sound pretty similar. You've got to have a lumpy cam though for it to sound like that scene in the movie.
 

stangman16

Active Member
Nov 16, 2004
640
4
29
San Antonio, TX
Dec 26, 2005
#9
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #9
HistoricMustang said:
And, the original was a MUCH better flick.
Click to expand...

It sure was better!
 

MustangMatt1966

New Member
Mar 11, 2004
1,004
1
0
Orlando Fl.
Dec 26, 2005
#10
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #10
I have a solution, just run strait headers...
 

thehueypilot

Active Member
Feb 25, 2004
1,084
0
37
Medina,Tennessee
Dec 26, 2005
#11
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #11
The "Bullitt" chase scene inspired me to finish mine. I put a new factory 2.25" stock duel exhaust in it and it sounded just like the movie sound. When I went to replace it for more flow the resonators only had about a 1 inch diameter hole through them. Talk about restrictions......but they sounded good.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Dec 26, 2005
#12
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #12
I'm a fan of both movies, but calling the original a better movie is kind of a stretch for me. I'm sorry but it's a terrible movie. Great car chase, but a miserable movie, but that's just my opinion. Niether one is very beleiveable, but that's beside the point. After all, what's the last realistic car movie you ever saw? American Grafitti? Other than that they're all a bit corny and far-fetched at times. Not that you couldn't jump a '67 Shelby GT500 from a slide-bed tow truck over a huge, multi-car pileup on the Vincent Thomas with no damage...
 

jerry S

New Member
Sep 3, 2003
1,365
1
0
52.22N 5.12E
Dec 26, 2005
#13
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #13
zookeeper said:
Other than that they're all a bit corny and far-fetched at times. Not that you couldn't jump a '67 Shelby GT500 from a slide-bed tow truck over a huge, multi-car pileup on the Vincent Thomas with no damage...
Click to expand...

They portrayed some damage as a result of the jump. The radiator was leaking and the front fascia was damaged. Me, I get that if I go over a speed bump too fast. NC jumped 10 cars over bridge, but you know....
 

DarkoStoj

Founding Member
Sep 4, 2002
929
13
39
Detroit
Dec 26, 2005
#14
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #14
jerry S said:
They portrayed some damage as a result of the jump. The radiator was leaking and the front fascia was damaged. Me, I get that if I go over a speed bump too fast. NC jumped 10 cars over bridge, but you know....
Click to expand...
at the angle the car landed, I would expect the thing to resemble more of a taco then a shelby mustang.
 

zookeeper

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2001
3,415
63
109
Rogue River, Oregon
Dec 26, 2005
#15
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #15
Exactly. My CRF450 has roughly a foot of suspension travel at each end and is meant to be jumped, yet I cringe at the thought of a flat landing from 20 feet up. Yet they expect you to think a vintage, unibody car with maybe 3 inches of suspension and a big-block (remember, it's supposed to be a GT500) hanging over the front wheels lands with minimal damage. Still, aside from that, I love the chase scene and the sound of Eleanor.
 

'66 coupe

Founding Member
Aug 7, 2000
1,202
9
59
Lakeland, Fl.
Dec 26, 2005
#16
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #16
zookeeper said:
I'm a fan of both movies, but calling the original a better movie is kind of a stretch for me. I'm sorry but it's a terrible movie.
Click to expand...

:Word: Glad somebody said it. I've seen better acting on those softcore **** movies they show on Showtime at 3AM. The original is also funny cause everyone dresses like a bunch of pimps with big coats and fuzzy hats.
The remake at least had some comedy relief to it.

If you watch the special features on GI60S(the new one), you can see the stunt guy jump the smaller ramp to simulate the landing on the bridge. After the landing, the rear gets squirelly and he eats the concrete barrier in the median head on.
 
E

electricgreen

Founding Member
Apr 9, 2002
1,140
0
36
Western NY
Dec 26, 2005
#17
  • Dec 26, 2005
  • #17
Who needs good acting with a chase scene & car like Eleanor (the original of course)! At least all the stunts were real and not computer enhanced...and if you have one of the original VHS tapes (not the re-release), you can hear what the car relly sounded like.
 

fvike

Member
Aug 24, 2004
335
0
16
Mosjøen, Norway
Dec 27, 2005
#18
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #18
DarkoStoj said:
and damn, i forgot how nice that mustang sounded.

Didn't they have a big block one, and a couple small block ones or something?

That one part of the movie where he broke the pass side mirror off......how do I make mine sound like that?

oh, and I know how much you all LOVE eleanore.......
Click to expand...

The only real Shelby in the movie, is the one you hear. Tee other cars all had small-blocks, the sound was recorded off a real Shelby BB.

BTW. the original film is much cooler, just because it's in a '70s setting.
 

Svtpilot

Founding Member
Jun 16, 2002
944
59
59
Long Island, NY
Dec 27, 2005
#19
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #19
I would never have thought it possible to make a movie featuring Angelina Jolie and a 67 Shelby GT500(cloned or otherwise) that sucked.

I thought wrong.
 

Edbert

Founding Member
Jul 13, 2002
3,548
32
109
Austin TX
Dec 27, 2005
#20
  • Dec 27, 2005
  • #20
zookeeper said:
Exactly. My CRF450 has roughly a foot of suspension travel at each end and is meant to be jumped, yet I cringe at the thought of a flat landing from 20 feet up. Yet they expect you to think a vintage, unibody car with maybe 3 inches of suspension and a big-block (remember, it's supposed to be a GT500) hanging over the front wheels lands with minimal damage.
Click to expand...
Why not? I have personally seen an orange Charger (the one with the confederate battle flag on the roof) jump accross rivers over and over without damage, in fact the two riders never wore seat belts.

EDIT: Maybe it was because the doors were welded shut, must have added a lot of strength by doing that.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

B
Where to go from here on my build…
  • B0udreaux
  • Tuesday at 3:59 PM
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
6
Views
99
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Wednesday at 11:07 AM
keel
T
Convertible A-pillar weatherstrip issues
  • thiefofcheese
  • Oct 24, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
336
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Nov 20, 2025
AeroCoupe
A definitive answer to the question of how much height Energy Suspension isolators add
  • 2000xp8
  • May 20, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
271
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 20, 2025
2000xp8
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
S
what would you do? sell the project and buy completed or finish project?
  • STANG32
  • Feb 8, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
601
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 16, 2025
rusty428cj
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?