shatner saves
New Member
- Jan 13, 2004
- 583
- 0
- 0
The enzo is by absolutely no means about looks, but it is ugly as hell.Ron Jeremy said:I don't like the Enzo. It's an ugly car. Ferrari doesn't make nice looking cars anymore.
You've seen one? lucky bastard.shatner saves said:It looks much better than it photographs.
XtorT'r said:HA HA HA, $300,000 That's a F***'n joke. It might cost 1 million to fix. lol![]()
vyto2 said:Remember, this car uses a monocoque(spelling) chassis, made of exotic materials, not metal. The hit looks hard enough that it was probably damaged. The suspension pieces are carbon fiber, again, probably trashed. It is not just cosmetic damage, slap on a few body panels and she's good as new. The technology behind it is all based on the F1 car. Who said it mid or rear engined? DUH! No, I thought the engine fell out!!! LOL! I saw the yellow one at the chicago show last year. Although I loved the lime Lambo better, the Marcielargo. (spelling)

As somone already stated this isn't a normal car and is probably insured at that cost because of the marquee value. I, of course, have no factual basis just like anyone else here.HairyCanary said:We have some evidence for how much it would cost to get it fixed. Insurance companies typically total a car if the damage exceeds 80% of the value of the car. The insurance company reportedly paid $1.3M on this car, so let's call that the value of the car. 80% of that is just a bit over $1.0M, so the estimate to repair must have been in that neighborhood.
Dave
4point6 said:why would you do that...buy a corvette Z06', a SVT Cobra,and a Ford GT, and call it a day. Quantity, not Quality.