• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Spark Plug Question

  • Thread starter Thread starter Jarvis
  • Start date Start date Sep 1, 2013
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last

Jarvis

Member
Jul 8, 2013
57
3
19
Fort Benning, GA
Sep 1, 2013
#1
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #1
I got some plugs and wires from LMR.

Plugs: Motorcraft: SP- 406, AGSP32C
Wires: FRPP 9mm

Question what should the Gap be? I saw the table that shows gaps but these plugs weren't on there. I
don't know the timing, or how to check. Mods are in the siggy. Thanks for the help guys.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 1, 2013
#2
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #2
stock gap should be fine for you

From "The Official Ford Mustang 5.0 Technical Reference & Performance Handbook 1979-1993" Ford Racing Part No. M-1832-Z4
Page 274
"Spark Plug Applications" table
Year---------Engine--------------Motorcraft number-------Gap (inches)
1979---------5.0L (49 state)-----ASF-52------------------.050
1979---------5.0L (california)-----ASF-52-6---------------.060
1980---------4.2L (all)-----------ASF-42------------------.050
1981---------4.2L (all)-----------ASF-52------------------.050
1982---------4.2L (all)-----------ASF-52------------------.050
1982-1985---5.0L carbureted-----ASF-42------------------.044
1982-1985---5.0L CFI------------ASF-52------------------.050
1986--------5.0L H.O.------------ASF-34 or 44------------.050
1987-1993---5.0L H.O.-----------ASF-42------------------.044
1993--------5.0L GT-40 (Cobra)--AWSF-42C---------------.050

1. Factory electrode gap specifications are shown on each Mustang's VECI label that is affixed underhood. The relatively wide gaps specified created the fat, long-duration spark needed to ignite the lean mixtures prescribed for most normal operating conditions.
2. Most non-Cobra 5-liter motors typically run well with spark plugs gapped at .052 inch. For normally aspirated engines in high-performance service, a plug gap between .040-.045 inch is suggested by many tuners. Those same sources also suggest .028-.034 inch in turbocharged, supercharged, and nitrous-fed five-ohs.
 

Jarvis

Member
Jul 8, 2013
57
3
19
Fort Benning, GA
Sep 1, 2013
#3
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #3
So .044? They're out of the box at .51. Also seems to be running a tad rich, does that change anyything?
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 1, 2013
#4
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #4
yep, .044. As far as running rich, pull your codes even if the cel is not on
 

Jarvis

Member
Jul 8, 2013
57
3
19
Fort Benning, GA
Sep 1, 2013
#5
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #5
I tried to pull codes, My CEL doesn't come on at all. When i start it, and when I jumped the diag connector
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 1, 2013
#6
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #6
pick up the cheap equus ford code reader. it plugs directly in to your diag connector and does everything for you

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000EW0KHW/?tag=stangnet-20
 

Jarvis

Member
Jul 8, 2013
57
3
19
Fort Benning, GA
Sep 1, 2013
#7
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #7
That's not a bad idea, I might pick one up at the store later.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 1, 2013
#8
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #8
have had mine for a dozen years
 

Jarvis

Member
Jul 8, 2013
57
3
19
Fort Benning, GA
Sep 1, 2013
#9
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #9
Nice! I've been waiting at least that long to get my Fox
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 1, 2013
#10
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #10
that reader is a god send
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 1, 2013
#11
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #11
@stykthyn, how do you do initiate the koer test? I can't semyo locate my manual and haven't done that on in a long ime
 

stykthyn

I want to measure mine. It doesn't look that tall.
15 Year Member
Jul 6, 2006
5,232
2,652
223
gainesville
Sep 1, 2013
#12
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #12
I plug the tester in power it up and then start the car. the manual has more details on how to extract more info such as the cylinder balance test. you have to press the gas to floor when the reader starts to flash or all testing stops and the reader cycles down.

If you try to plug in after the car is running it wont pull any codes, or at least I've never been able to.
 

vfast

Member
Aug 14, 2012
113
1
19
Va
Sep 1, 2013
#13
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #13
51 is ok
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Sep 1, 2013
#14
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #14
I just ordered one of those digital code readers from Amazon for future use.

On the question of spark plug gap, I'm running Autolite #25's. The label under the hood on my '92 says 52-56 for the gap. I set my plugs at 54.

Should I pull them back out and re-gap to 44 instead?
 

mikestang63

SN Certified Technician
Aug 27, 2012
11,606
8,859
214
In the garage
Sep 1, 2013
#15
  • Sep 1, 2013
  • #15
The 54 is the recommended gap from the factory. You should be fine there but if you want tighten the gap to 44 and see if it impacts the performance. Equally important is what type plug you run.
Those heads call for a certain size and reach plugs - 14mm by 3/4". When I had E brock heads I ran the same plugs ( Autolite 3924's one step colder) gapped at 54.

http://www.framcatalog.com/Competitor.aspx?b=A&pn=AGSP32C&em=True


http://www.edelbrock.com/automotive_new/mc/cylheads/ford/sb_perf_rpm.shtml
 
Last edited: Sep 1, 2013

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 4, 2013
#16
  • Sep 4, 2013
  • #16
Why blow $25 on a code reader that only works with old Ford EEC-IV systems when you can pull codes and run self-tests with a scrap piece of wire and a $0.99 12v test light? If you have a working CEL, then all it takes is the piece of wire.

Plug gap is more reliant on the ignition system and induction than the plug itself. I would use the stock gap with a stock TFI ignition and no power adders or high compression.
 

Jarvis

Member
Jul 8, 2013
57
3
19
Fort Benning, GA
Sep 4, 2013
#17
  • Sep 4, 2013
  • #17
65ShelbyClone said:
Why blow $25 on a code reader that only works with old Ford EEC-IV systems when you can pull codes and run self-tests with a scrap piece of wire and a $0.99 12v test light? If you have a working CEL, then all it takes is the piece of wire.

Plug gap is more reliant on the ignition system and induction than the plug itself. I would use the stock gap with a stock TFI ignition and no power adders or high compression.
Click to expand...
I dont have a CEL, i tried.
 

JD1964

there is enough sticking out to grab on to
15 Year Member
Jun 28, 2013
3,427
1,519
194
Maryland
Sep 4, 2013
#18
  • Sep 4, 2013
  • #18
65ShelbyClone said:
Why blow $25 on a code reader that only works with old Ford EEC-IV systems when you can pull codes and run self-tests with a scrap piece of wire and a $0.99 12v test light? If you have a working CEL, then all it takes is the piece of wire.

Plug gap is more reliant on the ignition system and induction than the plug itself. I would use the stock gap with a stock TFI ignition and no power adders or high compression.
Click to expand...

I have a habit of blowing $25 on all kinds of things. I see your point though. I used to get the codes from my old GM OBD1 cars with a paperclip in the diagnostic port and count the CEL flashes.
 

madspeed

Colonel Mustard
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
8,914
1,332
204
a van down by the river
Sep 4, 2013
#19
  • Sep 4, 2013
  • #19
you can still pull the codes without a cel. Theres a how to in jrickters surging idle checklist thread. That being said, I still prefer my handy $25 reader, guess i'm getting old
 

65ShelbyClone

Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
4,675
38
119
Antelope Valley, SoCal
Sep 5, 2013
#20
  • Sep 5, 2013
  • #20
Jarvis said:
I dont have a CEL, i tried.
Click to expand...

I know, I was making the indirect general statement that in a worst-case scenario, all you need is a $1 light and a piece of wire.
 
  • 1
  • 2
Next
1 of 2 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
152
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
96 GT 4.6 w/ dirty spark plug well
  • Mustang Momma
  • Apr 7, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
104
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 9, 2026
LILCBRA
I
98 Mustang GT dying
  • ItsMason
  • May 14, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
68
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- May 16, 2026
roblabsn95
R
F
Spark Plugs Caused Rough Idle & Driving
  • firevert
  • Sep 1, 2025
  • 2005 - 2009 Specific Tech
Replies
3
Views
361
2005 - 2009 Specific Tech Sep 3, 2025
Noobz347
Who the hell puts the wrong spark plugs in a 3.8L?
  • snowstang
  • Mar 25, 2026
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
12
Views
381
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Apr 3, 2026
LILCBRA
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?