• Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech

Spintech Side Exit System

  • Thread starter Thread starter ssppiitt
  • Start date Start date Dec 3, 2004
S

ssppiitt

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
206
0
0
Mountain View, Ca.
Dec 3, 2004
#1
  • Dec 3, 2004
  • #1
I am seriously contemplating the Spintech Side Exit System part# SX61000. I was wondering if you guys could give me your opinions of this system especially the mufflers. I have a connection that can get it shipped to me for $393. Which seems like a pretty good deal or maybe I am kidding myself. All reply's are greatly appreciated.
 
S

ssppiitt

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
206
0
0
Mountain View, Ca.
Dec 5, 2004
#2
  • Dec 5, 2004
  • #2
Come on guys. I expected to get at least a couple responses. Has nobody heard or read anything about these mufflers or this system?
 
6

65shlbycln

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
1,266
0
0
Atlanta
Dec 6, 2004
#3
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #3
I believe that Bob V. has some sort of spintech side exit system on his clone. I could be wrong, but his site is www.gt350clone.com

I read up on the spintech systems, and from what I hear, they sound pretty good. I heard that they will act fairly mild at lower rpms, but when you get on it, they'll REALLY howl.

So with the side exit system, if this is just a weekend car, go for it, but if you're going to be making daily runs in the car, I would think twice. Not only would more fumes be going into the car, but the noise would be pretty incredible.

As far as them droning, I'm not sure, but they are chambered, so I'm sure they would drone. Probably not as much as the flows though.

I know this is all opinionated, but no one else responded, so I thought i'd give you atleast something...
 
S

ssppiitt

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
206
0
0
Mountain View, Ca.
Dec 6, 2004
#4
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #4
Thanks 65shlbycln. I have heard that the noise is actually not so bad. What dop you mean by daily runs? Do you mean just use as a daily driver or runs at the track? Why would I not want the system if I drove her daily?
 

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Dec 6, 2004
#5
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #5
I think he already pointed out the fumes issue, if you are sitting in traffic/at lights it can flow up/in.

As for side exhaust the one thing I really hate about it is that if you are standing on one side of the car ... sounds like a 4cyl.
 
6

68Coupe289

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2002
234
0
0
Lexington, KY
Dec 6, 2004
#6
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #6
I've got them on my car. I don't notice a problem with fumes at all. They are loud, but not too loud (hard to describe).

They come in a couple of varieties, and if you call Spintech, they compare the 2 choices to a 2 and 3 chamber flowmaster.

I went with the quieter of the 2 choices (the one like a 3 chamber), and I'm glad I did. As I said, they are loud.

And yes, they drone. But I've got a big cam, so it doesn't grate on me (more like a blap blap blap blap sort of drone ). Plus my car is not a daily driver.
 
6

68Coupe289

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2002
234
0
0
Lexington, KY
Dec 6, 2004
#7
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #7
GT2K said:
I think he already pointed out the fumes issue, if you are sitting in traffic/at lights it can flow up/in.

As for side exhaust the one thing I really hate about it is that if you are standing on one side of the car ... sounds like a 4cyl.
Click to expand...

It only sounds that way if you don't put in H or x crossover pipe. You wouldn't mistake mine for a 4 cylinder.
 
S

ssppiitt

New Member
Apr 8, 2003
206
0
0
Mountain View, Ca.
Dec 6, 2004
#8
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #8
This is exactly the info I want to hear guys. Thanks. Hows about flow? Are these mufflers restricitve or are they closer to a straight through?
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 6, 2004
#9
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #9
The only neg. I have is they don't work with the TCP Subframe center X portion.

They're pretty loud in traffic because the sound bounces off of the car next to you!

I love the look on everyone's faces as you go by though
 

GT2K

Founding Member
Dec 27, 1999
311
0
0
Dec 6, 2004
#10
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #10
68Coupe289 said:
It only sounds that way if you don't put in H or x crossover pipe. You wouldn't mistake mine for a 4 cylinder.
Click to expand...

Volume is different, not necessarily the "tone"
 

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 6, 2004
#11
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #11
I have to agree with 68coupe. I have the x pipe and it sounds awesome. However, I had to hook it up for a little while without the x, and it sounded like crap!!!
 

CustomFastback

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2002
123
0
0
Dec 6, 2004
#12
  • Dec 6, 2004
  • #12
mdjay said:
The only neg. I have is they don't work with the TCP Subframe center X portion.
Click to expand...

Jay,

I thought Unique Performance was running the Spintechs and TCP X-frame connect with no problems?? I was considering running this setup too, is there something I should know about a particular setup from Spintech that won't work?
 
6

68Coupe289

Founding Member
Sep 13, 2002
234
0
0
Lexington, KY
Dec 7, 2004
#13
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #13
CustomFastback said:
Jay,

I thought Unique Performance was running the Spintechs and TCP X-frame connect with no problems?? I was considering running this setup too, is there something I should know about a particular setup from Spintech that won't work?
Click to expand...

My exit pipes supplied by spintech are notched to clear standard straight subframe connectors (although I don't have any, so I cannot comment on fit).

It's true though, that since the header pipes hit the front of the muffler, and then exit back out the front, I don't see how you could ever run an x-brace setup, unless you got really wicked with you exhaust routing and tucked the pipes up with the drive shaft in the tunnel.

EDIT: I would call TCP though, to verify that.
 

CustomFastback

Founding Member
Jun 6, 2002
123
0
0
Dec 7, 2004
#14
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #14
Here is a pic of UPs setup. They run there exit tubes through the rear of the car as explained here: http://customfastbackca.com/UPexhaust.htm . Obviously most people don't have this setup but I just wanted to show it can be done.
 

Attachments

  • performance7.webp
    23.2 KB · Views: 2,802

mdjay

Premium Sponsor
Dec 9, 2003
896
0
16
Las Vegas, NV
Dec 7, 2004
#15
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #15
Hey David

They're using their own exit tube from the muffler out and the mods you are already aware of. Their kit is designed around it so there may be other slight differences.

I'm not saying it can't be done. I'm just sayin' it isn't bolt on! With the Dr Gas kit, one of the tcp cross braces runs right in front of the exit pipe of the muffler. So you would have to move it back a little and take a tight turn out! Tough for mandrel bends, but probably not impossible.
 

66P51GT

New Member
Nov 7, 2003
721
1
0
Cerritos, CA
Dec 7, 2004
#16
  • Dec 7, 2004
  • #16
Personally, I would nix the TCP center brace and run Maier or Global West subframe connector. Except for the cool factor of a side exhaust (which gets a big thumbs up from me), the big advantage of a side exhaust is freeing up space for a panhard bar and/or fuel system.

$0.02
 
E

efi66r331

New Member
Mar 25, 2004
25
0
0
Seattle
Dec 8, 2004
#17
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #17
Don't underestimate the loudness of the louder mufflers from Spintech. I do not have the side exhaust, just the standard muffler out the back. This setup is with the louder of the Spintech mufflers, Dr Gas X, and only an e-cam. It is deafening at freeway speeds. I ordered the quieter of the mufflers I thought, but M-Plus screwed up the order and shipped me the loud ones. I didn't notice until I had them installed and they would not take them back. I love the sound (not the volume), but I will probably replace them with a new set of quieter Spintechs, and take advantage of the side exhaust to make room for the watts link and fuel cell.
 
R

reyesjo

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
66
0
0
Dec 8, 2004
#18
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #18
spintech side exhaust

Well hear is my opinion, the sound is great, I have had a 65 Mustang with a 302 and it had a custom H-pipe with 2 chamber Flow Master and dumps, the sound was way to loud the mufflers would resonate from the ground threw the interior of the car drove me nuts…. Did not care for that sound.. So that is why on my current 66 Mustang I went with Spin Tech side Exhaust, I love the sound, at idle the sound is mild and when compared to Flow Master quite; “you can actually have a conversation with the passenger”… I had to have a Muffler Shop do the entire exhaust system custom, I went with a 2.5” H-pipe and used the 333 SCS side muffler. The reason I went with a H-pipe is that Spin Tech is a free flowing muffler I needed some type of back pressure, the car is a street car and I don’t anticipate having more than 500 hp therefore don’t really need a X-pipe. At the moment the car has a 1989 5.0 with a T-5.. I must say I have not had the opportunity to drive on free-way yet and open her up; the car is under construction and waiting from Boyd Coddington some 17 X 8” Smoothies II to slap on…I ended up paying around $500 for the entire muffler setup…
 
R

reyesjo

New Member
Dec 7, 2004
66
0
0
Dec 8, 2004
#19
  • Dec 8, 2004
  • #19
spin tech

One more thing I had to go with the side exhaust; due to my electronic fuel pump for the fuel injectors is mounted where the mufflers would had come out of... But glad I did. thanks
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Mustang II 4 cyl gear hunting and possibly messed up vacuum system
  • oesterreicher
  • May 31, 2026
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
11
Views
316
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Jun 14, 2026
manicmechanic007
J
PCV system help for S/C
  • jay99914
  • Feb 16, 2025
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
661
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Feb 24, 2025
jay99914
J
Engine Random Misfire at idle.
  • Gulftown980x
  • Jul 29, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
11
Views
226
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Jul 31, 2026
squeak93
M
Progress Thread mnky99 2001 V6 evap core, ac compressor, heater core replacement
  • mnky99
  • Sep 5, 2025
  • 1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk-
Replies
1
Views
526
1996 - 2004 SN95 Mustang -General/Talk- Sep 5, 2025
mnky99
M
K
Engine 2000 Mustang GT - Fuel issue post-blown spark plug repair
  • kenster1092
  • Feb 26, 2026
  • SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech
Replies
4
Views
379
SN95 4.6L Mustang Tech Mar 10, 2026
kenster1092
K
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • Classic Mustang Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?