• Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information

North East SSoM Members!!!

  • Thread starter Thread starter whitehorseupnorth
  • Start date Start date Oct 20, 2003
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 342
  • 343
  • 344
  • 345
  • 346
  • …
  • 1056
Next
First Prev 344 of 1056 Next Last

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 1, 2005
#6,861
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,861
I know, I threw that in there as well.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 1, 2005
#6,862
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,862
DoubleONegative said:
A C4 vette? damn those aren't to quick. Well the ZR1s were quick damn quick but you should hurt a C5 bad and no lube ass rape a C4
Click to expand...
it was a C-4 I believe.
 

BadVoodoo

Founding Member
Aug 25, 2002
1,552
1
39
Belgrade
May 1, 2005
#6,863
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,863
The numbers are in for mee too 527RWHP, 469RWTQ. The initial tune is very conservative, with only 17* of total timing and an A/F ratio that does not go above 11.5 from 3k up, and dips into the 10's after 5k. There is a lot more power to be had with some tuning and a 17# pulley

-Mike
 

whitehorseupnorth

SSoM President
Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
1,772
0
36
Maine
May 1, 2005
#6,864
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,864
Badstang00 said:
The numbers are in for mee too 527RWHP, 469RWTQ. The initial tune is very conservative, with only 17* of total timing and an A/F ratio that does not go above 11.5 from 3k up, and dips into the 10's after 5k. There is a lot more power to be had with some tuning and a 17# pulley

-Mike
Click to expand...

Nice... you runnin 13psi or 15psi. You should be able to run the timing around 20 deg. I would say your A/F is close. If you say dips in the 10's as 10.8 or 10.9, than your not far off. I have to admitt, I figured yours and Dan's TQ#'s would be higher. Maybe thats just how the Mod engine is. I didn't realize you went down with Dan.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 1, 2005
#6,865
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,865
whitehorseupnorth said:
Nice... you runnin 13psi or 15psi. You should be able to run the timing around 20 deg. I would say your A/F is close. If you say dips in the 10's as 10.8 or 10.9, than your not far off. I have to admitt, I figured yours and Dan's TQ#'s would be higher. Maybe thats just how the Mod engine is. I didn't realize you went down with Dan.
Click to expand...
He went down a few hours after me. From what I have read up on it, it has to do with the efficiency of the 4V heads and the KB as to why the TQ #'s are lower. The KB is spinning alot slower then the eaton, so the volume of air is less. You tend to see when people spin the hell out of the 2.2 and 2.4 KB's up to around 21# + then the torque #'s are higher then the HP #'s.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 1, 2005
#6,866
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,866
whitehorseupnorth said:
Nice... you runnin 13psi or 15psi. You should be able to run the timing around 20 deg. I would say your A/F is close. If you say dips in the 10's as 10.8 or 10.9, than your not far off. I have to admitt, I figured yours and Dan's TQ#'s would be higher. Maybe thats just how the Mod engine is. I didn't realize you went down with Dan.
Click to expand...
Mike is running 15#, I am running 13#......for now!!!
 

whitehorseupnorth

SSoM President
Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
1,772
0
36
Maine
May 1, 2005
#6,867
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,867
Dan_Soprano said:
He went down a few hours after me. From what I have read up on it, it has to do with the efficiency of the 4V heads and the KB as to why the TQ #'s are lower. The KB is spinning alot slower then the eaton, so the volume of air is less. You tend to see when people spin the hell out of the 2.2 and 2.4 KB's up to around 21# + then the torque #'s are higher then the HP #'s.
Click to expand...

Ohh... If thats the case, it seems hardly worth it. That is, if you were going to run the same psi as stock. I mean the only way to get more power is to pulley the hell out of it. The KB is more efficient than the Eaton, so your explaination makes perfect sense.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 1, 2005
#6,868
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,868
whitehorseupnorth said:
Ohh... If thats the case, it seems hardly worth it. That is, if you were going to run the same psi as stock. I mean the only way to get more power is to pulley the hell out of it. The KB is more efficient than the Eaton, so your explaination makes perfect sense.
Click to expand...
at the same boost level, the KB will always make more power then the eaton. Look at mikes old #'s. He was running probably 2 more lbs of boost (around 15)with the 2.8 pulley on the eaton then I am with the 13# pulley on my KB. I made about 20 more HP with less boost then he had with that setup, but he had more TQ. How that works, I have no clue.
 

whitehorseupnorth

SSoM President
Founding Member
Sep 9, 2000
1,772
0
36
Maine
May 1, 2005
#6,869
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,869
Dan_Soprano said:
at the same boost level, the KB will always make more power then the eaton. Look at mikes old #'s. He was running probably 2 more lbs of boost (around 15)with the 2.8 pulley on the eaton then I am with the 13# pulley on my KB. I made about 20 more HP with less boost then he had with that setup, but he had more TQ. How that works, I have no clue.
Click to expand...

Thats kinda what I was getting at. Mike's TQ#'s were virtually the same from when he had the eaton. So how much boost do you need to get the Torque #'s a little more closer to the HP#'s.
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 1, 2005
#6,870
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,870
whitehorseupnorth said:
Thats kinda what I was getting at. Mike's TQ#'s were virtually the same from when he had the eaton. So how much boost do you need to get the Torque #'s a little more closer to the HP#'s.
Click to expand...
that I am not sure of.......for what I see around the 21# range. Even then the HP #'s are alot higher. Look @ Wordens 01 Cobra vs. my old 01 GT. Same blower, same boost, (Close) to same compression ratio, I put down 390rwhp, 420 rwtq. He put down what, 438hp, 405 tq or something like that? Something about these 4v motors that makes it that way. Obviously they breath ALOT better, but how does that effect tq (being lower) that is? I really have no clue?!
 

FEARNO1

Founding Member
Sep 1, 2002
1,241
1
39
Maine
May 1, 2005
#6,871
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,871
Add a lower pulley....The same thing is happening when they port the Eatons. Add a 2# or 4# and you will see the torque #'s. Mike those are good #'s although I did expect to see much higher..hopefully when you get the tune worked out they will be there.
 

cold96snake

20+ Year Stangneter
Jan 26, 2004
817
1
39
Truly, out to sea
May 1, 2005
#6,872
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,872
OK, since were, getting all technical, what effect does LT headers have? They produce more hp, but w/ less backpressure, doesn't torque go up relatively little vs. hp?

Trav, lmao at those chops.
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 1, 2005
#6,873
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,873
cold96snake said:
Trav, lmao at those chops.
Click to expand...


Thanks. Boring sunday morning w/ nothing going on = fun w/ MS Paint


Mike those are some awesome #'s

Could have bought a turbo and had over 500 FT LBS though
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
May 1, 2005
#6,874
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,874
FEARNO1 said:
Add a lower pulley....The same thing is happening when they port the Eatons. Add a 2# or 4# and you will see the torque #'s. Mike those are good #'s although I did expect to see much higher..hopefully when you get the tune worked out they will be there.
Click to expand...

yup!!!

the guy that had the 03 with the 2.2L on it at had a 4# lower. and made over 500RWTQ can't remember his exact numbers but his RWHP was 550ish while pullied at 15psi
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 1, 2005
#6,875
  • May 1, 2005
  • #6,875
maybe I should keep the upper and think about a 2lb lower then!
 

rustang04

Banned
May 4, 2004
239
0
0
May 2, 2005
#6,876
  • May 2, 2005
  • #6,876
Dan_Soprano said:
And the Results are in:

512 RWHP/ 445RWTQ.

Thanks For going along Mike (rustang)!!! It was great to meet you, and your car is pretty damn sick!!!! We WASTED that vette!!! Wow, driving home from NH in a down pour going 50mph sucks!!!!
Click to expand...

yeah i had a good time. it was nice to meet you as well. one nice car you got there. i am sure buy watching your dyno pulls and comparing numbers that if you free up some airflow( throttle body and exhaust) you will definately see around 530rwhp without changing any pulleys. that car has excellent potential.

mike.
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
May 2, 2005
#6,877
  • May 2, 2005
  • #6,877
Did you order the ProChamber yet
 

Venom351R

Founding Member
Apr 27, 2002
4,548
41
98
MAINE
May 2, 2005
#6,878
  • May 2, 2005
  • #6,878
DoubleONegative said:
ProChamber
Click to expand...




j/k, your car sounds sweeeet.
 

DoubleONegative

Active Member
Jun 30, 2003
1,528
2
39
Tioga Cty PA
May 2, 2005
#6,879
  • May 2, 2005
  • #6,879
The new guy owned a page!

Rustang...you gonna try and make the cruise with us on the 21st????
 

Dan_Soprano

15 Year Member
May 7, 2003
7,410
54
129
Jacksonville, FL
May 2, 2005
#6,880
  • May 2, 2005
  • #6,880
DoubleONegative said:
Did you order the ProChamber yet
Click to expand...
nope. its going to be a little while till I order it. Probably after deployment.
 
Prev
  • 1
  • …
  • 342
  • 343
  • 344
  • 345
  • 346
  • …
  • 1056
Next
First Prev 344 of 1056 Next Last
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

M
Too much for me to repair in my current housing situation
  • My Drama Magnet 04 Gt
  • Apr 1, 2026
  • The Welcome Wagon
Replies
8
Views
373
The Welcome Wagon Apr 14, 2026
Noobz347
J
Exhaust manifold to Y-pipe nut & stud dimensions?
  • joeybuddy96
  • Jul 7, 2026
  • SN95 V6 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
143
SN95 V6 Mustang Tech Jul 9, 2026
joeybuddy96
J
WTB 89 Hatchback interior trim - any color
  • Zero_chance
  • Jun 14, 2026
  • Want to Buy
Replies
2
Views
141
Want to Buy Jun 14, 2026
Noobz347
P
rear Impact absorbers.
  • Praetorious
  • May 4, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
2
Views
189
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- May 5, 2026
Praetorious
P
K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
449
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Community Forums
  • Regional Forums and Event Information
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?