• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Standard bore?

  • Thread starter Thread starter TokyoJoe
  • Start date Start date Nov 10, 2007
T

TokyoJoe

New Member
Mar 25, 2007
179
5
0
Nov 10, 2007
#1
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #1
Just wondering if this is a standard bore measurement? Looks like 10.16ish.... a 030 over is 10.2x right? This motor was sold to me as a "347" yet somehow I'm skeptical, how else to tell?



I've never cracked a 302 before so just to ask, these are aftermarket at the least aren't they?

 

Attachments

  • caliperedit.webp
    10.8 KB · Views: 115
  • teardown010.webp
    60 KB · Views: 116

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 10, 2007
#2
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #2
Put one of the cylinders at the bottom of the bore. Then get a tape measure out and measure from the top of the piston to the block deck.

You should get 3.4 inches.
 
T

TokyoJoe

New Member
Mar 25, 2007
179
5
0
Nov 10, 2007
#3
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #3
Okay then, looks like 3.4. Hmmm

Thanks
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 10, 2007
#4
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #4
The pistons look aftermarket, because they have an extra intake valve "lip" valve relief.

Also, you can have a stroked 302 with the stock 4.00" bore. It would be a 342 cubic inch engine.
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Nov 10, 2007
#5
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #5
yeah, don't listen to when people say they "bore it out to a 347" you have to stroke and bore it, but almost all the added cubes are from the extra stroke. Those look aftermarket pistons cause of the extra valve relief for the intake valve like 5spdGT said. They are dished somewhat so compression is probably fairly low depending on your cylinder head cc chamber. I think normally too if a piston is oversized, it will be stamped with ".030" or 4.030 somewhere on it in the middle. Don't worry that it's a 342, those extra 5 cubes wouldn't do much. Rejoice that you have thicker cylinder walls instead.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 10, 2007
#6
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #6
And to answer your other question, 10.16 centimeters is equal to a stock 4 inch bore, and 10.24 centimeters is equal to a 4.030" overbore, rounded up.

Where are you measuring at? At the top ridge may not be the most accurate place. Maybe try a couple inches down in the bore. You may just have a stock bore though, with the "347" crank, with a 5.315" or 5.400" rod.

I agree with Fast63. Do not worry about the extra 5 cubes
 
T

TokyoJoe

New Member
Mar 25, 2007
179
5
0
Nov 10, 2007
#7
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #7
Thanks for the help, I measured as far down as the calipers would go, maybe an inch. I need to go measure my pushrods also I guess just to be certain.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 10, 2007
#8
  • Nov 10, 2007
  • #8
Your pushrods are not going to matter. I was talking about your connecting rods. That is something you will find a hard time measuring without removing the oil pan at the very least

I would be willing to bet you have the 5.4" rod. That includes the 1.090" compression height piston.

The 5.315" rod includes a taller piston at 1.175" compression height.

They both can make a 342 or 347 (depending on bore size).
 

Fast63

New Member
Sep 20, 2007
717
0
0
Nov 11, 2007
#9
  • Nov 11, 2007
  • #9
you should measure at the very top of the cylinder bore too, because the bore is always bigger at the bottom, it is tapered.
 
J

Jack's95gt

Member
Aug 15, 2004
443
1
18
Huntingdon Valley, PA
Nov 11, 2007
#10
  • Nov 11, 2007
  • #10
They are after market pistons. Many manufactures will have the parts number and the size right on the top of the pistion. Clean then up and you will see. I bought a new SVO block and kept it standard bore and I have a 342.
 
T

TokyoJoe

New Member
Mar 25, 2007
179
5
0
Nov 11, 2007
#11
  • Nov 11, 2007
  • #11
LOL, I feel dumb. Yeah, would be a feat to measure the connecting rods without pulling the shortblock haha. Thanks for the help everyone.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Engine Suggestions on an engine rebuild. Stock cam/GT40Ps or aftermarket on both for a fun weekend driver?
  • MadSquirrelTech
  • Apr 28, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
23
Views
591
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 7, 2026
MadSquirrelTech
Paint and Body Rotten moon roof trim
  • Teen'93stang5.0
  • Apr 14, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
3
Views
112
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 15, 2026
Teen'93stang5.0
H
Forced Induction On3 Turbo Kit- Parts list NEEDED - 302 Stock Motor
  • Hirothecool1
  • Feb 27, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
21
Views
850
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 7, 2026
slow84lx
S
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
3
Views
668
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 28, 2026
Noobz347
J
Help Figuring Motor Choice(Possible future turbo)?
  • jaygee15
  • Dec 14, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
13
Views
467
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jan 3, 2026
Jarhead67
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?