• Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech

Starter Madness

  • Thread starter Thread starter Stewart Ledford
  • Start date Start date May 27, 2004

Stewart Ledford

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
188
0
0
Kentucky
May 27, 2004
#1
  • May 27, 2004
  • #1
HI fellow stangnet MustangII owners,
We need to start a thread on what plagues the C4 automatic V-8 starting system of our Mustang II's. I have purchased 3 bellhousing, 3 flywheels and 5 staters without any change in the terrible grinding at startup. Can any of you come up with solutions or something else I can try?
 
C

cobraii351

Founding Member
Jan 10, 2000
1,104
4
39
Altoona, PA
May 27, 2004
#2
  • May 27, 2004
  • #2
I've never had any troubles. except with headers cooking starters. I made a heat shield to fix that problem. I use a 157 tooth flywheel and bell. I was using the standard "old style" starter but recently started using the later model PMGR starter. Works great.

Tim
 

Stewart Ledford

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
188
0
0
Kentucky
May 27, 2004
#3
  • May 27, 2004
  • #3
cobraii351 said:
I've never had any troubles. except with headers cooking starters. I made a heat shield to fix that problem. I use a 157 tooth flywheel and bell. I was using the standard "old style" starter but recently started using the later model PMGR starter. Works great.

Tim
Click to expand...
I am using the correct 141 tooth flywheel bellhousing and converter for Mustang II.
Stewart
 

Mstng2

Founding Member
Jun 27, 2002
789
5
19
- - Zion - -
May 27, 2004
#4
  • May 27, 2004
  • #4
Never had a starter problem in 20 years of owning II's perhaps a shim?
 

Apsychotic

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
92
0
0
May 27, 2004
#5
  • May 27, 2004
  • #5
Loud starter

My starter is loud also, works fine, but awfully squally when cranking. I never worried about it though.
 
J

jshcobra

Founding Member
Jul 5, 2000
720
0
0
May 27, 2004
#6
  • May 27, 2004
  • #6
In the past two years, my ghia has eaten more than 6 starters and one ringgear. Then I took a chance and ordered a gear reduction starter from a joint in Texas over ebay. They swore up and down that it would work on a v8 II and since the price was only $65 I took a chance. Absolutely perfect! Quiet.

My theory is the problem may be due to the small diameter of the II flywheel which requires more force to spin it than other cars or II's using the larger 157 tooth flywheel. Not all starters are up to the task. Original ford starters may be ok, but most remanufactured ones are junk. That may explain why the gear reduction starter works so well- it has more torque to spin the smaller flywheel.

I'll look for the company that sold me the gear reduction starter and post it tonight.
 
Z

zwhitr

Founding Member
Aug 26, 2001
847
0
16
Goldsboro, NC
May 27, 2004
#7
  • May 27, 2004
  • #7
Stewart Ledford said:
HI fellow stangnet MustangII owners,
We need to start a thread on what plagues the C4 automatic V-8 starting system of our Mustang II's. I have purchased 3 bellhousing, 3 flywheels and 5 staters without any change in the terrible grinding at startup. Can any of you come up with solutions or something else I can try?
Click to expand...


stewart it has been done!

sleeper can we resurrect that thread "starter craziness"

Dano grabbed every starter he had and measured the nose cone depth and determined the longer nose was needed.

Others with original equipment have no problems but once you get that rebuilt lifetime from AZ you are in a downward spiral.

2 options get your original one rebuilt yourself

or gear reduction they come with 10 tooth drives which mesh nicely with the 141 tooth flex and its popular Its just a standard ford PMGR (permanant Magnet gear reduction) for around 100 bucks do a search for pmgr ford

plus you get the added saving of weight and more room for headers I'm runnning a modified set of headmans #1 tubs right past the starter no problems.
 
C

COBRAIIW

New Member
Apr 26, 2003
562
1
0
CT
May 27, 2004
#8
  • May 27, 2004
  • #8
Does this help?
 

Apsychotic

New Member
Dec 5, 2003
92
0
0
May 28, 2004
#9
  • May 28, 2004
  • #9
Please explain

COBRAIIW said:
Does this help?
Click to expand...
Not to sound ignorant, but no. Can you please explain the pic. All I see is several different starters, mostly with Ford cones. Are you saying that a factory Ford starter is correct as an aftermarket isn't? Thanks, Chris
 

Stewart Ledford

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
188
0
0
Kentucky
May 28, 2004
#10
  • May 28, 2004
  • #10
Guys Guys Guys

COBRAIIW said:
Does this help?
Click to expand...
Hey are you guys always taught to think in reverse? Ok lets cover whats already been done on this situation.
1.) I have previously installed the famous Dano D2 starter cone.
2.) I have also purchased and installed the PMGR starter with 10 tooth drive.
3.) I have installed a "new" flywheel
4.) 3 different bellhousings.

Come on guys think through this and locate something new.

Stewart
 

innocentfool

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
132
4
19
Winnipeg, Manitoba
May 28, 2004
#11
  • May 28, 2004
  • #11
i had the same problem with my manual tranny in my KC.

the problem? check your motor mounts! mine were worn on the passenger side and caused the grinding
 

74ProII

Founding Member
Jul 23, 2000
194
1
17
Bremerton, WA, USA
May 28, 2004
#12
  • May 28, 2004
  • #12
Are you sure your tranny case isn't cracked? I've seen one c-4, standard bellhousing that had that problem. Usually more common in c-6"s I would double check the starter's teeth engagement on one of your take out 141 tooth flywheel. Wouldn't be the first time that was screwed up by aftermarket companies.
 

Stewart Ledford

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
188
0
0
Kentucky
May 28, 2004
#13
  • May 28, 2004
  • #13
74ProII said:
Are you sure your tranny case isn't cracked? I've seen one c-4, standard bellhousing that had that problem. Usually more common in c-6"s I would double check the starter's teeth engagement on one of your take out 141 tooth flywheel. Wouldn't be the first time that was screwed up by aftermarket companies.
Click to expand...

The transmission case is in good condition as are the bellhousing and starter mounting holes threads. I have hand rolled the starter drives through the flywheel teeth checking the mesh and it runs along smoothly.
Stewart
 
J

jshcobra

Founding Member
Jul 5, 2000
720
0
0
May 28, 2004
#14
  • May 28, 2004
  • #14
innocentfool said:
i had the same problem with my manual tranny in my KC.

the problem? check your motor mounts! mine were worn on the passenger side and caused the grinding
Click to expand...

I'm confused. How do motor mounts affect the starter? Can you be more specific?

Stewart Ledford: Here's a new thought- since the 141 tooth automatic ringgears are coming from the aftermarket, it's possible that even though they have the correct tooth count and diameter, the pitch may be wrong. In researching ringgears for the manual ringgears I've made, I found that different gears may have the same number of teeth, but different pitch, either 12 or 14 deg. You wouldn't be able to notice this difference by "hand rolling" a starter drive on the gear as it will seem to work fine. The problem is that hand rolling doesn't simulate the significant force of the ringgear tooth resisting the force being exerted by the starter as it spins.

My suspicion is that the autoparts stores that stock the so-called correct automatic flexplates are actually using incorrectly machined ringgears.

Have you tried a good original ford flexplate?

Also, the proper starter cone casting number is either D60x or D7Ox. The D7Ox is a service replacement for the D6Ox. (I'm not sure of the last digit, but someone had posted it here a while back)
 
Z

zwhitr

Founding Member
Aug 26, 2001
847
0
16
Goldsboro, NC
May 28, 2004
#15
  • May 28, 2004
  • #15
Stewart Ledford said:
Hey are you guys always taught to think in reverse? Ok lets cover whats already been done on this situation.
1.) I have previously installed the famous Dano D2 starter cone.
2.) I have also purchased and installed the PMGR starter with 10 tooth drive.
3.) I have installed a "new" flywheel
4.) 3 different bellhousings.

Come on guys think through this and locate something new.

Stewart
Click to expand...
Hey Stew

Lets not bite the hand that feed us!

You asked for help and we gave you what we know, we have done this topic to death before you came on here.

The things you listed you have never mention before so don't critize us on how we think.



starters go bad (fact of life) the only reason we replace the flexplate is because the starter starts to slip and then chews up the ring gear my money is on the drives themself

my on hundered dollar PMGR investment was the best thing next to my limited-slip I have ever done.

So now Fix it your self or Deal with it

Z-out
 
L

LedZ 5.0

now you have my pea brain going in circles
Apr 1, 2004
204
0
0
May 28, 2004
#16
  • May 28, 2004
  • #16
Stewart Ledford said:
HI fellow stangnet MustangII owners,
We need to start a thread on what plagues the C4 automatic V-8 starting system of our Mustang II's. I have purchased 3 bellhousing, 3 flywheels and 5 staters without any change in the terrible grinding at startup. Can any of you come up with solutions or something else I can try?
Click to expand...

Not trying to insult your intelligence, but do you have the seperator plate installed between the bell and rear engine block? The reason I ask is that this has happened to me with a II I bought a while back. The seperator plate was not reinstalled when the former owner did a motor change. It chewed up the starter drive and damaged a manual ring gear since the drive was placed closer to the flywheel.
 

Stewart Ledford

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
188
0
0
Kentucky
May 28, 2004
#17
  • May 28, 2004
  • #17
jshcobra,
I believe you have the correct diagnosis with the aftermarket ring tooth pitch wrong on the flexplates....I am almost certain....I am just having a real difficult time locating a Ford original flexplate......that will be my next major attempt. Thanks for your support guys.
Stewart


jshcobra said:
I'm confused. How do motor mounts affect the starter? Can you be more specific?

Stewart Ledford: Here's a new thought- since the 141 tooth automatic ringgears are coming from the aftermarket, it's possible that even though they have the correct tooth count and diameter, the pitch may be wrong. In researching ringgears for the manual ringgears I've made, I found that different gears may have the same number of teeth, but different pitch, either 12 or 14 deg. You wouldn't be able to notice this difference by "hand rolling" a starter drive on the gear as it will seem to work fine. The problem is that hand rolling doesn't simulate the significant force of the ringgear tooth resisting the force being exerted by the starter as it spins.

My suspicion is that the autoparts stores that stock the so-called correct automatic flexplates are actually using incorrectly machined ringgears.

Have you tried a good original ford flexplate?

Also, the proper starter cone casting number is either D60x or D7Ox. The D7Ox is a service replacement for the D6Ox. (I'm not sure of the last digit, but someone had posted it here a while back)
Click to expand...
 

Stewart Ledford

Founding Member
Aug 24, 2002
188
0
0
Kentucky
May 28, 2004
#18
  • May 28, 2004
  • #18
LedZ 5.0
Yeah I agree this could be a possibility. I have the shim plate installed between the bellhousing and the engine block.
Stewart

LedZ 5.0 said:
Not trying to insult your intelligence, but do you have the seperator plate installed between the bell and rear engine block? The reason I ask is that this has happened to me with a II I bought a while back. The seperator plate was not reinstalled when the former owner did a motor change. It chewed up the starter drive and damaged a manual ring gear since the drive was placed closer to the flywheel.
Click to expand...
 

innocentfool

Founding Member
Apr 28, 2002
132
4
19
Winnipeg, Manitoba
May 28, 2004
#19
  • May 28, 2004
  • #19
jshcobra said:
I'm confused. How do motor mounts affect the starter? Can you be more specific?

sorry i did not have time to explain further, i was running late for work!

anyways the motor mount was worn down so the engine was shifting to the right hand side when starting. shifting enough to push the starter against the cross member and flex it outward away from the ring gear. being an aluminium bellhousing there is apparently enough flex to allow this to happen.

i did not believe it when i was told this by the ford dealership i took the car to, but after replacing the mounts i have not had the problem ever again(four years and counting!!) b
Click to expand...
 

Wart

I'm Mad as HELL and I'M not Gonna Take it ANYMORE!
Founding Member
Sep 1, 1998
408
3
58
NE Ohio
May 29, 2004
#20
  • May 29, 2004
  • #20
jshcobra said:
Stewart Ledford: Here's a new thought- since the 141 tooth automatic ringgears are coming from the aftermarket, it's possible that even though they have the correct tooth count and diameter, the pitch may be wrong. In researching ringgears for the manual ringgears I've made, I found that different gears may have the same number of teeth, but different pitch, either 12 or 14 deg.

.......

Also, the proper starter cone casting number is either D60x or D7Ox. The D7Ox is a service replacement for the D6Ox. (I'm not sure of the last digit, but someone had posted it here a while back)
Click to expand...


The gear pitch opens an interesting thought: Starter remanufacturers could be using a bendix with the wrong pitch. Would explain why someone replaces a starter and picks up the grinding problem.


The part number: The forth position would be a E. The third position being a O tells me it is a common engine part for all model lines. If it were special for the II it would have a Z in the third position.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

K
3.8 T5 & Bellhousing to 1987 Lincoln 5.0
  • ks65stang
  • Mar 2, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
3
Views
253
Other Auto Tech Mar 3, 2026
Noobz347
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
Drivetrain 83’ Glx convertible C5 Trans help!
  • JacksonJared2113
  • Dec 25, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
336
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 26, 2025
JacksonJared2113
Engine 302 production block selection
  • FastDriver
  • May 19, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2 3
Replies
48
Views
7K
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 1, 2025
FastDriver
J
Progress Thread Family member 1989 GT- Backstory and updates
  • JRC99
  • Apr 19, 2025
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
15
Views
1K
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Oct 26, 2025
JRC99
J
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?