• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

Engine Starter ring gear depth. 3/8 or 3/4 inch?

  • Thread starter Thread starter 92Rustang
  • Start date Start date Aug 4, 2025

92Rustang

Member
Nov 11, 2022
58
8
18
Massachusetts
Aug 4, 2025
#1
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • #1
1992 gt with 5.0 and t5. Is starter supposed to be 3/8 or 3/4" ring gear depth? Have a mcleod flywheel coming and I don't want to ruin it. I saw write ups on how to measure it but I dont have it yet to install and want to order a starter meanwhile.. And I dont trust the starter I pulled out to be the correct one it was grinding like crazy and ruined the flywheel ring gear. (Brand new one from napa).. I want to order a new starter.
 

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,956
2,916
194
Middle of Maine
Aug 4, 2025
#2
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • #2
IDK
Of all the times I have installed engines, transmissions, starters and done swaps from auto to manual and vice versa, I have never measured the engagement depth. And it has never been a problem.
I have swapped from stock starters to mini starter, both Ford and aftermarket and have not had an issue.
As long as the flexplate or flywheel had the correct number of teeth (157/164) I have never had a issue.
I have even not used the separator plate between engine/trans and had everything work fine.
Only time I have had starter engagement issues is on GM vehicles that use shims to space starter to ring gear depth. You chase that for a time or two to get it right.
 
Reactions: General karthief

92Rustang

Member
Nov 11, 2022
58
8
18
Massachusetts
Aug 4, 2025
#3
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • #3
Bullitt347 said:
IDK
Of all the times I have installed engines, transmissions, starters and done swaps from auto to manual and vice versa, I have never measured the engagement depth. And it has never been a problem.
I have swapped from stock starters to mini starter, both Ford and aftermarket and have not had an issue.
As long as the flexplate or flywheel had the correct number of teeth (157/164) I have never had a issue.
I have even not used the separator plate between engine/trans and had everything work fine.
Only time I have had starter engagement issues is on GM vehicles that use shims to space starter to ring gear depth. You chase that for a time or two to get it right.
Click to expand...
New flywheel is 157 teeth. So do I need a starter for 157 tooth ? Does the 164 tooth starter not work ?
 
Reactions: General karthief

Bullitt347

I have been doing it wrong this whole time
15 Year Member
Mar 23, 2007
3,956
2,916
194
Middle of Maine
Aug 4, 2025
#4
  • Aug 4, 2025
  • #4
92Rustang said:
New flywheel is 157 teeth. So do I need a starter for 157 tooth ? Does the 164 tooth starter not work ?
Click to expand...
No.
But if the bellhousing is for 164 tooth, then that would be a problem.
The Bellhousing has to match the flywheel diameter requiremenmts.
 
R

Rcdgl

5 Year Member
Feb 19, 2018
313
168
63
Aug 22, 2025
#5
  • Aug 22, 2025
  • #5
Confirm that bellhousing, flywheel/flexplate diameter, and block plate all have to match. Flywheel/flexplate balance must match damper style.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

3
Eight inches is enough for me...
  • 351MooseStang
  • Nov 27, 2025
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
Replies
5
Views
552
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech Mar 2, 2026
Bullitt347
D
Foxbody Misfire 5.0 Swap
  • DPORTER0729
  • May 2, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
588
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 13, 2025
90sickfox
Starters suck. So does the aftermarket!
  • Blue Thunder
  • Apr 30, 2024
  • 1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech
  • 2
Replies
30
Views
4K
1974 - 1978 Mustang II Talk & Tech May 13, 2024
Blue Thunder
Place to Avoid: Jamison Auto Group in Gulfport, MS
  • D Durden
  • Oct 20, 2025
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
  • 2 3
Replies
45
Views
2K
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Feb 4, 2026
nickyb
6
Hey all,I’m putting together a 302 for my 1968 Mustang and wanted to post the combo + some questions to make sure I’m not missing crucial
  • 68_Disgustang
  • Feb 22, 2026
  • 1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk-
Replies
4
Views
804
1965 - 1973 Classic Mustangs -General/Talk- Jun 20, 2026
gray owl
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?