• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech

Steel vs Aluminum UD Pulley...

  • Thread starter Thread starter 95.0Stang
  • Start date Start date Nov 9, 2008
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Nov 9, 2008
#1
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #1
Does anyone have a preference? this will be one of my next couple mods, so just wondering.

 

SMOKEDYA

20+ Year Stangneter
Jul 13, 2003
3,637
8
79
Tucson AZ
Nov 9, 2008
#2
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #2
i really dont think there is any diffrence? what are you buying them for the 95? i have a set now for sale email me at ugot8byaford@yahoo.com or call me 360 241 8025 heres a link for ya also
http://cgi.ebay.com/ebaymotors/ws/e...parms=tab=Selling&item=140280482232&viewitem=



peace


john
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 9, 2008
#3
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #3
I would only buy/run aluminum pulleys. They will not rust like the steel ones... in aheavy pig like mine I'll also take every pound or two I can drop.
 

95Vert

New Member
Aug 19, 2004
1,785
0
0
North Mexico (deep south Texas)
Nov 9, 2008
#4
  • Nov 9, 2008
  • #4
Killercanary said:
I would only buy/run aluminum pulleys. They will not rust like the steel ones... in aheavy pig like mine I'll also take every pound or two I can drop.
Click to expand...

Save as much rotating mass as possible. Aluminum all the way.
 

94-302-vert

Active Member
Aug 16, 2004
1,947
2
36
NE CT
Nov 10, 2008
#5
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #5
Steel... I drive my car a lot so I do not want to worry about the aluminums wearing on me... my steel ones show quite a bit of wear on the WP pulley after 65k miles...
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 10, 2008
#6
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #6
Aluminum is more attractive and like some said ... less weight

Steel is durable and the choice of OEM

I myself am more into go than show
so
I went for the max gain for the min buck spent ... Steel

Hey ... When I get that great feeling of being pushed back in the seat

I can't see ANYTHING under the hood

As I see it ... Both options have something good to offer

Grady
 

Killercanary

The car that set the bar.
Founding Member
Nov 29, 1999
5,676
1
76
Altoona, PA
Nov 10, 2008
#7
  • Nov 10, 2008
  • #7
94-302-vert said:
Steel... I drive my car a lot so I do not want to worry about the aluminums wearing on me... my steel ones show quite a bit of wear on the WP pulley after 65k miles...
Click to expand...


Hmmm... I've had mine on since 1999 and they look as good as they did when I bought them.

Grady, I would suspect that the OEM use steel because its likely cheaper than aluminum to make.
 

5spd GT

"the 5.0 owns all"
Founding Member
Aug 7, 2002
9,516
6
99
Arkansas
Nov 11, 2008
#8
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #8
Aluminum pulleys without a doubt if you can spare the extra dough.

If we can use aluminum heads, intakes, driveshafts, etc., I think we can use some pullies.
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 11, 2008
#9
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #9
I had a belt slip on my aluminum water pump pulley, and it tore it up. After that, the pulley would sing. I just put the stock water pump pulley back on. I think the weight difference is negligible. Just get what you can afford. Arguing over the weight and rotating mass of the pullies is kind of ricerish in my book. I would say it's totally neglible. The aluminum ones look better. If you want your engine to look nice, which is understandable, spend the extra money.

Kurt
 

Bosko5.0

Active Member
May 18, 2006
1,067
0
37
longwood, FL
Nov 11, 2008
#10
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #10
I have aluminums on for a while with only 3 bolts on the water pump and still no warping and my belt is tight. I weighted all the stock pullies and the aluminum ASP pullies and wrote down all the weights but I am no where near my house.
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 11, 2008
#11
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #11
Killercanary said:
Hmmm... I've had mine on since 1999 and they look as good as they did when I bought them.

Grady, I would suspect that the OEM use steel because its likely cheaper than aluminum to make.
Click to expand...

Absolutely Paul

You know how it is

If they can save a penny or two on each set they install

Over time ... That represents a lot of money saved

Grady
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Nov 11, 2008
#12
  • Nov 11, 2008
  • #12
final5-0 said:
Absolutely Paul

You know how it is

If they can save a penny or two on each set they install

Over time ... That represents a lot of money saved

Grady
Click to expand...

OMG please spare me...lets say they save $.03 on each GT they built, and lets go further out on a limb and say they build 250,000...so for $7500 they could rate the car 10hp higher (flywheel obviously)...it would be in their best interest to sell one extra car and make up the difference...
 

revhead347

Apparently my ex-husband made that mistake.
20+ Year Stangneter
Jun 14, 2004
9,302
1,645
214
Acworth, GA
Nov 12, 2008
#13
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #13
Aluminum pullies might add up to .01 HP at the flywheel. They are only 10hp because they are underdrive pullies. 3 cents is a lot of money when you are building a production car. Every little piece adds up fast.

Kurt
 
9

95.0Stang

Member
Feb 20, 2003
538
1
18
Kansas
Nov 12, 2008
#14
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #14
I think I am going to go Aluminum, but this thread was very helpful, thank you for all your feedback!!!



Jared
 

final5-0

Mustang Master
Apr 6, 2003
6,817
12
79
DFW Texas
Nov 12, 2008
#15
  • Nov 12, 2008
  • #15
95.0Stang said:
OMG please spare me...lets say they save $.03 on each GT they built, and lets go further out on a limb and say they build 250,000...so for $7500 they could rate the car 10hp higher (flywheel obviously)...it would be in their best interest to sell one extra car and make up the difference...
Click to expand...

I agree with the way you put it here

But ... You gotta remember you and I are ... Gearheads

I assure you ... Bean Counters ... They don't think that way

Like was said ... they find EVERY way to cut back

After doing that as many ways as they can on each car ......
That practice will add up to a significant amount of money saved

I'm with you
they need to focus on things that make more horsepower :Word:

Grady
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

S
Engine Belt routing with supercharger and smog/ac/ps delete
  • Steve6482
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
0
Views
55
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Jul 15, 2026
Steve6482
S
Engine Underdrive pulleys
  • Mindseye007
  • Feb 1, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
22
Views
845
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Feb 14, 2026
Willybill32
B
Idler pulley as substitute for Power Steering Pump ?
  • Bhenders
  • Jul 15, 2026
  • Other Auto Tech
Replies
5
Views
129
Other Auto Tech Jul 16, 2026
LILCBRA
O
Powdercoating aluminum wheels?
  • optionizerSS
  • Feb 6, 2026
  • Mustang Sound & Shine All
Replies
2
Views
395
Mustang Sound & Shine All Feb 15, 2026
optionizerSS
O
R
Fox Hydroboost conversion/proportional valve
  • RubyRedNotch
  • Jul 20, 2026
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
Replies
0
Views
48
1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk- Jul 20, 2026
RubyRedNotch
R
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • 1994 - 1995 Specific Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?