• Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech

stock 5.0 HO engine specs

  • Thread starter Thread starter SaturnPimpin
  • Start date Start date Jun 23, 2004
S

SaturnPimpin

New Member
Apr 10, 2004
5
0
0
NC
Jun 23, 2004
#1
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #1
ok whats the engine specs for a 1988 5.0 HO motor? i know they are roller motors but the rest is unclear. is it true they have forged pistons? any help?
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jun 23, 2004
#2
  • Jun 23, 2004
  • #2
85-92's have forged pistons.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 24, 2004
#3
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #3
Forged pistons, cast crankshaft, cast connecting rods, NON-roller rockers

87-92 - 225 hp / 300 ft-lbs. torque
 

fordman54935

Member
Jan 10, 2003
301
0
16
Wisconsin
Jun 24, 2004
#4
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #4
Some 5.0 H.0. engines also have forged connecting rods(not sure exactly which years) but in the dealer literature for my 88 GT says it has forged connecting rods, and the 1986 5.0 H.O. motor that I'm rebuilding right now had forged connecting rods. You can tell a forged con rod (and alot of parts for that matter) apart because a cast piece will have a crisp, distinct parting line from where the die was separated, and a forged part will not have such a sharp line, but a more rounded ridge caused by the forging process.
 

SNAKEYES86GT

Member
Jun 24, 2004
59
1
9
Downers Grove, IL
Jun 24, 2004
#5
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #5
I just bought an 86 GT with a ****ty looking intake, no A/C, and a Flowmaster exhaust. Any educated guesses on what the tq and hp numbers should be? The engine and transmission run like they've been touched by god.
 

jpctln

New Member
Jun 1, 2004
198
0
0
StL, MO
Jun 24, 2004
#6
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #6
What exactly did they do in '93 to drop the HP to 205?
 

drgn5.0

Founding Member
Mar 13, 2001
603
0
0
Jun 24, 2004
#7
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #7
supposedly the way they measured the cars hp changed and it went down to 215. other then that i don't know. the pistons in 93 were hyperu's, but i don't see that making less hp. if anything slightly more because they are a little lighter than forged.
 

saleenx029

New Member
Jun 10, 2004
117
0
0
Cincinnati, Ohio
Jun 24, 2004
#8
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #8
jpctln said:
What exactly did they do in '93 to drop the HP to 205?
Click to expand...


From what I have come to understand, the HP did not drop in any way, even tho the pistons were different, no other mechanical changes were responsible for the power drop. The 93 was dropped from 225 hp to 205 hp, and from 300 lb ft to 275 lb ft of torque. Supposedly this was because ford recognized many restrictions, including the intake silencer. This silencer was considered a "body part" and not considered a factor in the testing. It was found to choke off 5-7 hp in tests, we all know this is true. Also there was a minor cam profile change in late 88, this affected approximately 3 hp. Another reason the rating dropped is because the smog-pump specifications were not made yet and the 5.ohs were dynoed without the 3 hp loss of the smog pump. Also the original 1987 5.oh motor was dynoed at 225 hp with no a/c system, and the belt driven cooling fan on maximum slip. Also, the original rating was made while the mustang was still a speed density car in 88, and the switch to a mass air system, with a slight bit more restriction and tendency to run slightly richer was also worth about 2-3 hp. On top of all this, Ford thought it acceptable that all mustangs under promise and over deliver, and some cars were not made as well as others, resultiong in some cars being a little less powerful. This is why Ford dropped the power rating in 93. The motors make the same power between 92-93, but IMO the forged 86-92 motors are (obviously) the best.
 

maverick0716

Founding Member
Jan 12, 2002
3,924
0
56
Chilliwack, BC, Canada
Jun 24, 2004
#9
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #9
SNAKEYES86GT said:
I just bought an 86 GT with a ****ty looking intake, no A/C, and a Flowmaster exhaust. Any educated guesses on what the tq and hp numbers should be? The engine and transmission run like they've been touched by god.
Click to expand...

Well, stock they came with 200 hp and 285 ft-lbs. torque.....so I'm guessing you're pretty close to that.
 

HISSIN50

"How long does it take to get help in here?
15 Year Member
Nov 29, 1999
31,179
33
129
Jun 24, 2004
#10
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #10
in addition, supposedly they wanted the '94 model year stangs (SN's) to look at least, if not more, appealing power-wise. the SN's have less power than the foxes - i think a new computer, emissions, and space constraints (the last one is a guess. different snout, overheating and detonation are common issues) had something to do with the lack of power. the 5.0's are a dirty little motor and may have been detuned to help with stricter emissions......

feel free to flame away, but i seem to recall this from several sources.
 

88stangmangt

Active Member
Nov 25, 2003
2,332
1
48
Stafford,VA
Jun 24, 2004
#11
  • Jun 24, 2004
  • #11
everyone just needs a blower and a coke.
 

Red88 RICK

Member
Sep 2, 2006
101
0
17
Connecticut
Nov 2, 2006
#12
  • Nov 2, 2006
  • #12
does anyone know what the stock pushrod size is? cause i need to order new ones but im not sure about diffrent sizes i got a crane cam made for the computer controlled engine and planed on keeping the rocker arms but i really cant figure out what pushrods to order also if anyone can give me any tips on building an engine it would be awesoem this is my first rebuild in my sig it says pretty much everything i got (the push rods i acually ordered were longer than the ones that came out of the engine)
 

Red88 RICK

Member
Sep 2, 2006
101
0
17
Connecticut
Nov 2, 2006
#13
  • Nov 2, 2006
  • #13
also does anyone know if the part number "Pro-66879"
on summitracing.com would work for stock 5.0 heads?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

D
Engine HO cam in non HO roller block ‘93 f150
  • DanC1993f150
  • Mar 21, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
7
Views
227
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Mar 29, 2026
General karthief
C
Electrical Under dash wiring
  • ChicagoMustang
  • Apr 17, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
1
Views
100
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Apr 17, 2026
AeroCoupe
Drivetrain 5th Gear Ratio
  • PonyGTrider
  • Dec 8, 2025
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
  • 2
Replies
33
Views
986
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Dec 31, 2025
Qtrhrse23
Q
A
1987 5.0 speed density Foxbody crank no start
  • Alan2204
  • May 23, 2026
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
10
Views
176
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech May 30, 2026
Mcmahst
G
Engine Is this a HO or non-ho?
  • Gnfanatic
  • Nov 8, 2024
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Replies
2
Views
230
Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech Nov 9, 2024
Gnfanatic
G
Share:
Bluesky Email Share Link
  • Mustang Forums
  • 1979 - 1995 (Fox, SN95.0, & 2.3L) -General/Talk-
  • Fox 5.0 Mustang Tech
Menu
Log in

Register

  • Forums
  • What's new
  • Media
  • Resources
  • Contact
  • Sponsor
X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?

X

Privacy & Transparency

We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:

  • Personalized ads and content
  • Content measurement and audience insights

Do you accept cookies and these technologies?